English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 74993/106084 (71%)
Visitors : 19421800      Online Users : 125
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100065


    Title: Between Foundation and Convention: Carnap's Evolution between Schlick and Neurath in the Vienna Circle
    Other Titles: 在「基礎」與「約定」之間:卡爾納普在「維也納學派」介於石里克與紐拉特之間的發展
    Authors: 苑舉正
    Yuann, Jeu-Jenq
    Keywords: 基礎論;約定論;卡爾納普;石里克;紐拉特
    Foundationalism;Conventionalism;R. Carnap;M. Schlick;O. Neurath
    Date: 2003-07
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 15:02:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 長期以來,「邏輯實證論」的基本立場均視之為是「基礎論」的。同時,一般人也認為,卡爾納普是導致這個印象的主要人物之一。不過,晚近的研究顯示,這個印象並不正確,因為如果從另一種觀點來看,我們會發現,卡爾納普一樣可以是一個「約定論者」。的確,重新檢視一些卡爾納普當年的作品,我們感到必須承認,他對相關科學觀點所採的立場,確實處於「基礎論」與「約定論」之間。我們在這篇論文中企圖論證,透過研討當年在「維也納學派」中所進行的討論,尤其是介於卡爾納普、石里克與紐拉特之間的辯論,我們始能理解卡爾納普的「搖擺立場」。我們期待能夠清楚地說明,卡爾納普起初採「基礎論」立場,而後卻在紐拉特的影響之下,轉向「約定論」的立場。透過這個論證,我們想要提出如下兩點結論:一、沒有任何「共同立場」足以代表當年在「維也納學派」所進行的討論;二、在受到紐拉特的影響之下,卡爾納普的立場中發展出一種「寬容的倫理態度」。
    For long the foundationalist image of logical positivism has been considered a matter of course. And it is basically accepted that R. Carnap has a great deal to do with this traditional image. Recent researches reveal that this image is not entirely true; Carnap can be deemed as a conventionalist also when some key conceptions are understood from a different point of view. Indeed, by examining some Carnap’s works, we are urged to realize that his view of science is somehow situated somewhere between foundationalism and conventionalism. We argue in this paper that Carnap’s weaving situation can be comprehended by taking into account the discussions taking place in the Vienna Circle and notably the debates among R. Carnap, M. Schlick, and O. Neurath. We intend to make it explicit that Carnap’s stance was first in line with that of Schlick’s foundationalism and then moved to a more conventionalist one under the influence of Neurath. By this argument, we intend to demonstrate the following two points: 1) Discussions in the Vienna Circle were far from unanimous; 2) Carnap’s stance containing ‘an ethical attitude of tolerance’ proceeded mainly under Neurath’s influence.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 10, 35-74
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    10-35-74.pdf380KbAdobe PDF156View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback