English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23402452      Online Users : 181
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100095


    Title: 判斷形式的演繹?——論黑格爾邏輯學中的判斷論
    Other Titles: Deduction of the Forms of Judgment?—On Hegel’s Theory of Judgment in the Science of Logic
    Authors: 史偉民
    Shi, Weimin
    Keywords: 黑格爾;邏輯學;判斷;思辯命題
    Hegel;Science of Logic;judgment;speculative proposition
    Date: 2007-01
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 15:44:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 黑格爾《邏輯學》中的判斷論大多被理解為對於傳統邏輯中的判斷形式的演繹,而對應於康德所提出的判斷表。康德建立判斷表時並不純然依據邏輯的原則,同時也具有知識論的動機。本文論證:即使把知識論的動機納入考慮,也不能解釋黑格爾對於判斷形式的奇特界定;相反地,根據他的界定,所謂的判斷其實指的是某種表達同一性的命題。本文進一步論證:此一對於判斷的理解與黑格爾在《精神現象學》〈前言〉中對於判斷的批判一致。
    Hegel’s theory of judgment in the Science of Logic is generally taken to be a deduction of the forms of judgment in the traditional logic that correspond to those listed in Kant’s table of judgment. Kant did not construct his table merely according to logical principles, but was motivated epistemologically too. In this paper, it is argued that, even taking epistemological motives into consideration, one cannot account Hegel’s eccentric determination of the forms of judgment. On the contrary, according to his determination, so-called judgments are certain propositions expressing identity. It is then further argued that such an understanding of judgment is in accordance with the criticism of judgment that Hegel issued in the preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 17, 51-88
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    17-51-88.pdf409KbAdobe PDF165View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback