政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100115
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109951/140892 (78%)
造访人次 : 46219272      在线人数 : 735
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100115


    题名: Particularism, Pattern and Rule-following
    其它题名: 個別主義、模式、規則遵循
    作者: 祖旭華
    Tsu, Peter Shiu-Hwa
    关键词: 個別主義;原則主義;規則遵循;意義的規範性;可普遍性
    particularism;principlism;rule-following;the normativity of meaning;universalizabilit
    日期: 2010-01
    上传时间: 2016-08-11 15:59:17 (UTC+8)
    摘要: Frank Jackson, Michael Smith與Philip Pettit在〈道德個別主義與模式〉一文中為原則主義者辯護，他們主張「對」這個道德語詞的意義，必定受一個統攝性的意義模式所規範。而如果這個統攝性的意義模式是X，那麼我們就可以推導出一個為真的道德原則「X是對的」。如此一來，主張沒有為真的道德原則存在的個別主義就被否證了。 就文獻上來看，有四種用來證成有此統攝性的意義模式存在的論證。它們分別是概念掌握論證 (conceptual competence argu-ment)、意義的規範性論證 (the normativity of meaning)、一致性論證 (consistency) 與可普遍性論證 (universalizability)。本文目的在於悍衛個別主義，筆者將論證以上四種論證都不成功。在文章末尾，筆者將更進一步論證，即便有此統攝性的意義模式存在，這也無助於原則主義者宣稱有真的道德原則存在，因為「對」這個道德語詞的意義模式 (pattern) 不同於對的判準 (criterion)。
    Frank Jackson, Michael Smith and Philip Pettit, in their co-authored paper “Ethical Particularism and Pattern” argue on behalf of the principlists that there must be a unifying meaning pattern gov-erning the term “rightness”. And if there is a unifying meaning pat-tern, let’s say X, that governs the use of the term “rightness”, then we can get a true moral principle of the following form: X is right. Par-ticularism, a doctrine which denies the existence of any true moral principles, would thus be falsified. In defense of particularism, I will critique four arguments invoked in support of the claim that there is such a pattern: the conceptual competence argument, the normativity of meaning argument, the consistency argument, and the universalizability argument. I contend that none of these arguments work. In the end of my paper, I argue that even if there is a pattern of the term “rightness”, it will not help the principlists to establish their claim that there are true moral principles, for a meaning pattern of rightness has to be distinguished from a criterion of rightness.
    關聯: 政治大學哲學學報, 23, 79-116
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    23-79-116.pdf311KbAdobe PDF2424检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈