English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46239492      Online Users : 1014
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100211


    Title: 贓物所有權歸屬之賽局分析
    Other Titles: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Property Rights by Theft
    Authors: 王智賢;林宛萱
    Wang, Jue-Shyan;Lin, Wan-Hsuan
    Keywords: 贓物;善意;子賽局完全均衡
    Date: 2014-04
    Issue Date: 2016-08-16 13:54:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在贓物所有權歸屬問題之下，本文承繼 Rose（2010）的設定，使用賽局模型分析贓物不適用善意取得（即無條件歸還原持有者）及適用善意取得的法律規定，並討論我國實際贓物所有權的制度，並比較三種制度下的參賽者的聯合效用大小。透過本研究可發現，原持有者擁有物品所有權的效用相對較高時，社會上應偏向贓物不適用善意取得較有效率；當潛在買方擁有物品所有權的效用相對較高時，社會上應偏向贓物適用善意取得較有效率。而我國現有制度不管在何種情況之下，皆不是最有效率的，故我國對贓物所有權歸屬的法律從效率面而言有重新檢討之必要。
    Modifying the settings of Rose (2010), this paper uses the game theoretic model to discuss whether a stolen good is applicable of bona fide acquisition system. We compare the total utilities among three systems: a rule of law where good faith is irrelevant, a rule where good faith may protect an innocent buyer, and the real regulation in Taiwan. It is shown that as the utility of the potential buyer with the ownership is much lower than that of the owner, a rule of law where good faith is irrelevant is the most efficient while as the utility of the potential buyer with the ownership is much higher than that of the owner, a rule where good faith may protect an innocent buyer is the most efficient. The regulation in Taiwan is not the best to the society and necessary for the government to amend.
    Relation: 社會科學論叢, 8(1), 85-118
    Journal of Social Sciences
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[社會科學論叢] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    8(1)-85-118.pdf1441KbAdobe PDF2503View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback