English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90058/119991 (75%)
Visitors : 24124557      Online Users : 2273
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 文化越界  > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/100433
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100433


    Title: 抵抗的力量來自何處:試論戴維‧莫利的「積極受眾論」
    Authors: 金惠敏
    Jin, Hui-min
    Keywords: 霍爾;莫利;積極受眾;日常生活;社會本體論
    Stuart Hall;David Morley;Active Audience;Everyday Life;Socio-ontology
    Date: 2011-09
    Issue Date: 2016-08-18 17:32:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「積極受眾論」是伯明罕學派對電視研究的一大貢獻,而從廣義的大眾文化研究看,它也是對法蘭克福學派文化工業論的一個重大突破。現今,積極受眾論已成為英國文化研究的基本庫存,以及當代傳播學研究的基本定理。但是對於「受眾」何以是「積極的」這一積極受眾論最核心、最關鍵的問題,在其主要闡發者莫利那裡,很難找到哲學上的論證。因而嚴格說來,一個積極的受眾論就仍然有待完成。本文主要從對莫利的人種誌研究和有關理論闡說的細讀中,批判了其間所存在的在話語層面尋找積極受眾的不徹底的路子,而推演出一個社會本體論的「受眾」概念,它假定,受眾是因其作為社會本體的存在而具備為「抵抗」所突顯的積極反應的能力的;或者,更可以不無馬克思或佛洛伊德意味地說,受眾的「物質性存在」才是其積極或抵抗的最終解釋。
    The “active audience” is a great contribution made by the Birmingham school to televisual studies, and broadly speaking, i.e., from the viewpoint of popular culture studies, it also significantly breaks the doctrine “cultural industry” held by the Frankfort School. The “active audience” has nowadays been reserved as one of the primary stocks of British Cultural Studies, and regarded as a fundamental theorem in modern communication studies. Be it as it may, a kernel question of how this audience is active has not been given any philosophical argumentation in the work of David Morley which has founded the active model of audiences, though. Therefore, a full-fledged “active audience” is still to be expected. Having closely looked at Morley’s ethnographic researches into audiences and in particular his theoretical interpretation of his researches, this article negated any possible way of finding the “active audience” at the level of discourses, and finally, inferred a socio-ontological concept of the audience. This concept assumes that the audience has, because of its socio-ontological existence, active responses that are rendered eminent by the resistance. With a ring of Max and Freud, the material existence of the audience serves as the final explanation to its activeness and resistance.
    Relation: 文化越界,1(6),67-104
    Cross-cultural Studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[文化越界 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML253View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback