English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23820839      Online Users : 128
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 俄羅斯學報 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/100877
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100877


    Title: 半總統制下的內閣組成與政治穩定
    Other Titles: Cabinet Formation and Political Stability under Semi-Presidentialism: Comparing Russia, Poland and the Roc
    Authors: 吳玉山
    Wu, Yu-Shan
    Keywords: 半總統制;中華民國;俄羅斯;波蘭;比較政治制度;組閣
    semi-presidential system;ROC;Russia;Poland;comparative political institution;cabinet formation
    Date: 2002-02
    Issue Date: 2016-08-30 14:27:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文比較了中華民國、俄羅斯和波蘭的半總統制在府會分立下的穩定性表現。挑選這三個國家是因爲俄羅斯和波蘭代表多黨體系的半總統制國家府會對應的兩種不同的模式,而台灣在今(民國90)年底已經進入多黨政治,剛好正面臨模式抉擇的歷史關鍵。本文採用兩層的分析框架。第一層是先以總統權力大小、府會關係和政黨體系搭建出半總統制運作的基本框架;第二層是再以多數/少數內閣、單一政黨/聯合內閣與總統黨參與/不參與內閣三個變項演繹出八種組閣的狀態,而後分別計算其可欲性。在分析框架確定後,本文將俄羅斯、波蘭和台灣的三個經驗事例加以歸類定性,並探討其實際的表現和理論推論的結果是否吻合。本文的重點是探討半總統制國家在多黨的政黨體系下內閣組成的可能狀態與不同模式的分析比較。俄羅斯和波蘭代表的兩種不同模式正可作爲台灣在憲政發展關鍵點上的借鏡。
    This paper compares stability performance under the semi-presidential system in the ROC, Russia and Poland. These three cases are selected because Russia and Poland represent two distinctive modes of interaction between the president and the parliament under semi-presidentialism in a multi-party system, and Taiwan after the year-end parliamentary elections of 2001 has shifted to a multi-party system, thus sharing the same institutional framework with Russia and Poland. This paper applies a two-level analytical framework. The first level focuses on presidential power, president-parliamentary relations, and party system. The second level of analysis integrates the three variables of majority/minority cabinet, single-party/coalition government, and participation/non-participation of the presidential party and comes up with eight cabinet formation scenarios. The desirability of those eight scenarios is calculated. The empirical cases of Russia, Poland, and Taiwan are categorized accordingly, and their performance is then examined against theoretical predictions derived from our analytical framework. The focus of this paper is to compare the different cabinet formation modes in a semi-presidential, multi-party system. The Russian and Polish cases represent distinctive modes of president-parliamentary interaction that can shed light on Taiwan's institutional development at a critical moment.
    Relation: 俄羅斯學報, 2, 229-266
    Journal of Russian studies
    Vestnik instituta rossii
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[俄羅斯學報] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    2-229-265.pdf2158KbAdobe PDF168View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback