English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46220199      Online Users : 772
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100987


    Title: 對著作權保護範圍擴張的因應-合理使用實務與理論基礎之研究
    Other Titles: A Response to the Enlargement of the Scope of Copyright-A Review of Judicial Practice and the Theoretical Framework of Fair Use
    Authors: 闕光威
    Keywords: 合理使用;市場失靈;對價理論;Google Print;合理使用實證研究
    Date: 2007-10
    Issue Date: 2016-08-31 16:36:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著著作權權利範圍與保障時間的擴張，著作權人更強的獨佔權利對於持續創新與知識流通可能的負面影響成為眾所關注的問題。此時，合理使用如何發揮兼顧公共利益與創作者創作誘因的機能更為重要。但本研究發現，我國現有合理使用的案件不但數量有限而且類型仍相當單純，現有案例恐無法提供清楚的法律指引，如此將可能造成對著作利用人的寒蟬效應。在這種窘境下，回歸合理使用的理論基礎可能是最佳的解決方式。近年來美國學者所提倡的對價理論與市場失靈理論雖仍有未竟之處，但仍然提供我國司法者與社會大眾一個清晰的參考點，但進一步理論細緻化的工作，仍待進一步努力。
    Along with the enlargement of the scope and duration of copyright, it is generally believed that the barrier to continual innovation and knowledge distribution also increases. How to leverage fair use to best preserve public interest thus becomes a very important issue. This research conducted a survey over fair use cases in Taiwan since 1999. It is found that the current fair use cases are limited in number and only involve straight-forward facts and are less delicate compared to similar development in other advanced countries. If the current most controversial case- Google Print- were heard in Taiwan, the current precedent even fails to provide a concrete roadmap toward dispute resolution. A blurry line of fair use may result in chilling effect to the potential innovators. This paper suggests that resorting to the most basic theoretical basis of fair use may be a best solution to such difficulty. Although the current most influential theories- market failure and quid pro quo- have their own disadvantage, yet they provide a clear starting point for the judiciary and the society as a whole. That said, how to enrich the content of the current theoretical framework and make it more practicable remains a most difficult yet utmost important subject ahead of us.
    Relation: 政大智慧財產評論, 5(2), 53-80
    NCCU Intellectual Property Review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[智慧財產評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2409View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback