English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90058/119991 (75%)
Visitors : 24129004      Online Users : 2022
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101180


    Title: Hannah Arendt政治思想的途徑
    The Approach of Hannah Arendt's political thinking
    Authors: 楊麗菁
    Contributors: 葉浩
    楊麗菁
    Keywords: 政治哲學
    政治理論
    方法論
    研究途徑
    說故事
    Hannah Arendt
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-09-02 01:03:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究希望以鄂蘭的政治思想的研究途徑作為討論的對象,試圖從方法論的角度循著鄂蘭自己的反思歷程,來釐清鄂蘭對政治理論的貢獻。首先在第二章中說明她在極權主義的研究中所產生的理解問題,以及鄂蘭如何對政治哲學傳統以及現代社會的科學化努力進行強烈地批判。第三章我們將看到鄂蘭對實踐生活的重新考察,藉由重新找回政治行動的意義與重要性,鄂蘭同時也發現了行動難以消解的困境,成為了新的政治思想亟需克服的重要問題。第四章則是聚焦「說故事」(storytelling)的討論上,將討論說故事的主要功能以及以說故事為政治思想途徑的一些問題。
    Reference: 一、 中文部份
    Canovan, Margaret
    2009 《阿倫特政治思想再釋》,陳高華譯。北京:人民出版社。
    Jahanbegloo, Ramin
    1994 《以撒⋅柏林對話錄 : 思想的瀚海》,楊孝明譯。臺北市:正中。
    Marsh, David and Gerry Stoker
    2009 《政治學方法論與途徑》,陳義彥等譯。台北:韋伯。
    邱彥彬
    2010 〈反胃的社會主義?:論辛克萊《叢林》的生命政治〉,《英美文學評論》,第16期,頁155-185。
    郭秋永
    2009 〈改造運動:政治哲學與政治科學〉,《東吳政治學報》,27卷1期,頁1-64。
    陳思賢
    1999 《西洋政治思想史-古典世界篇》,臺北市,五南圖書。
    黃默、陳俊宏
    1997 〈政治哲學要跨出去!論台灣政治哲學研究的發展趨向〉,《東吳政治學報》,8期,頁1-45。
    蔡英文
    1997 〈兩種政治的概念:卡爾‧史密特與漢娜‧鄂蘭〉,《臺灣社會研究季刊》,27期,頁139-171。
    2002 《政治實踐與公共空間——漢娜‧鄂蘭的政治思想》,臺北:聯經出版公司。
    童涵浦
    2010 《從意識形態批判到有效性的建立:Hannah Arendt論「判斷」的政治意義》。台灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文。
    蕭高彥
    2006 〈共和主義、民族主義與憲政理論:鄂蘭與施密特的隱蔽對話〉,《政治科學論叢》,27輯,頁113-146。
    二、 英文部份
    Arendt, H.
    1953 “[The Origins of Totalitarianism]: A Reply,” World Politic The review of politics. 15(1), 76-84.
    Anthony F. Lang, Jr. and John Williams
    2005 Hannah Arendt and International Relations: Reading Across the Lines , New York: Palgrave Press.
    Barker, Kye
    2013 “Book Review: Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging Tradition by Steve Buckler,” LSE Review of Books. Available at http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2013/03/29/book-review-hannah-arendt-and-political-theory-challenging-tradition/
    Benhabib, Seyla
    1994 “Hannah Arendt and the Redemptive Power of Narrative,” in Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman eds., Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    1996 The Reluctant Modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
    Cooper, B., & Voegelin, E.
    1999 Eric Voegelin and the foundations of modern political science. University of Missouri Press.
    Dahl, Robert
    1958 “Political Theory: Truth and Consequences,” World Politics 11: 89-102.
    Disch, Lisa Jane.
    1993 “More Truth Than Fact: Storytelling As Critical Understanding In The Writings Of Hannah Arendt,” Political Theory 21 (4): 665-694.
    1994 Hannah Arendt And The Limits Of Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Gunnell, J. G.
    1979 Political theory: Tradition and interpretation. Winthrop Publishers.
    Held, David
    1991 “Introduction,” in D. Held eds, Political Theory Today. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press
    Kateb, George
    1983 Hannah Arendt: Politics, Conscience, Evil. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
    1999 “The Judgment of Arendt,” Revue-Internationale-de-Philosophie 53(208): 133-154.
    Kerry H. Whiteside
    1998 “Worldliness and Respect for Nature: an Ecological Appreciation of Hannah Arendt's Conception of Culture,” Environmental Values 7: 25-40
    Kielmansegg, P., Mewes, H. and Glaser-Schmidt, E., eds.
    1997 Hannah Arendt and Leo Strauss: German Emigrés and American Political Thought after World War II, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Kirkpatrick, Evron
    1962 “The Impact of the Behavioral Approach on Traditional Political Science, ”, in Austin Ranny ed., Essays on theBehavioral Study of Politics. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, pp. 1-29.
    Laslett, Peter
    1956 “Introduction, ” Philosophy, Politics and Society (series1) Oxford: Blackwell: vii-xv.
    Luban, David
    1994 “Explaining Dark Times: Hannah Arendt’s Theory of Theory,” in Lewis P. Hinchman and Sandra K. Hinchman eds., Hannah Arendt: Critical Essays. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    Margaret Canovan
    1983 “Arendt, Rousseau, and Human Plurality in Politics,” The Journal of Politics 45(2) : 286-302
    Maria Tamboukou
    2013 “Love, Narratives, Politics: Encounters between Hannah Arendt and Rosa Luxemburg,” Theory, Culture & Society 30: 35.
    Moon, J. Donald
    1982 “Interpretation, Theory, and Human Emancipation,” in Elinor Ostrom. eds., Strategies of Political Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp.149-178.
    Parekh, Bhikhu C.
    1981 Hannah Arendt and the search for a new political philosophy. Springer.
    Simon Swift
    2009. Hannah Arendt. London: Routledge.
    S. Kierkeggard
    1944 Concluding Unscientific Postscript, W. Lowrie eds., Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    Speight, Allen
    2011 “Arendt on Narrative Theory and Practice,” College Literature 38(1): 115-130.
    Steve Buckler
    2012 Hannah Arendt and Political Theory: Challenging Tradition. Edinburgh University Press.
    Topolski, A
    2015 Arendt, Levinas and a Politics of Relationality. Rowman & Littlefield International.
    Voegelin, Eric
    1953 “The Origins of Totalitarianism,” Review of Politics. 15(1), 68-76
    Vollrath, Ernst
    1977 “Hannah Arendt and the Method of Political Thinking,” Hans Fentel Trans. Social Research. 44(1):160-182
    Young-Bruehl, Elisabeth
    1982 Hannah Arendt: For Love of the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    1977 “Hannah Arendt's Storytelling,” Social Research 44(1): 183-190
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    99252021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099252021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    202101.pdf1996KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback