English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 75035/106099 (71%)
Visitors : 19430340      Online Users : 385
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 廣播與電視 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/101320
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101320


    Title: 以媒體政策觀點--社會價值與經濟效益--背後隱含的閱聽人模式,評析有線電視 系統獨占性特許經營之爭議
    Other Titles: Uncovering the Audience Models from Social Values and Economic Efficiency Perspectives on Media Policy: Light Shed on the Debate over Exclusive Cable Television Franchising
    Authors: 王婷玉
    Wang, Ting-yu Tiffany
    Keywords: 媒體政策;社會價值;經濟效益;有線電視系統;獨占性營運特許;閱聽人模式
    Audience models;media policy;exclusive cable television franchising;social values;economic efficiency
    Date: 2001-09
    Issue Date: 2016-09-05 16:40:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本論文首先整理相關文獻,比較有線電視管制之主要取向。然後,\r 針對有線電視系統獨占性營運特許政策之爭議,在經濟效益與社 會價值之分析架構下,以主要取向適用與否:包括印刷媒體、廣播電 視媒體、公用載具、功能取徑、以及受限的公共論壇等五種管制模\r 式,來評估贊成與反對獨占性營運特許兩派主張之利弊得失。另外, 借用由Entman & Wildman(1992)提出的分析架構,把追求生產者福 利的「商品模式」與追求消費者福利的「市場模式」歸屬為強調經濟 效益的媒體政策觀點;並進一步依據強調社會價值的媒體政策觀點, 提出追求公民社會福祉的「公共論壇模式」,修改延伸了Webster & Phalen 提出的大眾閱聽人模式,而發展出媒體政策觀點背後所預設的\r 閱聽人模式。最後,進一步釐清經濟效益與社會價值如何在媒體決策 上相互牴觸,或相輔相成。 本文目的不在做價值判斷,分出孰輕孰重,而在於澄清政策辯論 中常用的核心概念,並且把隱而不彰的閱聽人模式搬出來放到檯面\r 上,以使常易失焦的媒體政策辯論重新切入問題的核心。\r 未來在界定媒體政策辯論議程時,宜把價值觀點與所隱含的閱聽 人模式予以透明化,以免因定義焦點不同,或指涉不同政策目標,而 無法有效的對話。未來研究可望進一步檢驗媒體政策價值觀點、閱聽 人模式、媒體政策辯論說辭之間(between as well as among)複雜的 關係,以供改進媒體決策效率與品質之參考。
    This paper begins with a review of the literature on the main approaches to regulating cable in general. The arguments for and against the policy of exclusive franchising in cable television, in particular, are examined respectively from the perspectives of economic efficiency and social values. The evaluation of these pros and cons centers on how to apply the newspaper model, the broadcast model, a common carrier model, functional approach, or public forum analysis to cable regulation adequately. The aim of this paper is not to prioritize one over the other perspective on media policy, but to propose an expanded research agenda designed to enrich policy dialogue in an attempt to develop more effective communications policy. In closing, we suggest researchers to clarify further the complex linkages between and among perspectives on media policy, the implied audience models, and the rhetoric of advocates of specific policies.
    Relation: 廣播與電視, 17, 73-94
    Journal of Radio & Television Studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[廣播與電視] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    17(p73-94).pdf444KbAdobe PDF226View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback