Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/104004
|
| Title: | 讓自由主義合情理：Bernard Williams論合法性與現代性
Making Sense of Liberalism: Bernard Williams on Legitimation and Modernity |
| Authors: | 王雲飛 |
| Contributors: | 葉浩
王雲飛 |
| Keywords: | Bernard Williams
政治現實主義
政治道德主義
基本合法化要求
恐懼的自由主義
現代性
Bernard Williams
Political Realism
Political Moralism
Basic Legitimation Demand
Liberalism of Fear
Modernity |
| Date: | 2016 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-11-14 16:20:10 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | Bernard Williams是當代政治哲學中現實主義思潮的代表人物。他批判將道德優先於政治的政治道德主義，主張應該給予政治本身更多的自主性。他提出「基本合法化要求」作為政治中的規範性來源，並結合現代性作為條件，開創了一條新的通往自由主義的道路。本文通過梳理Williams的理論，來檢視其對於合法性與現代性兩個概念的論述，並從中窺探Williams對於政治理論的方法論的見解。本文雖贊同並欣賞Williams的相關主張，並承認其方法論上之關懷的獨特性，但仍提出以下批評。首先，Williams對於「政治」的理解已經蘊含道德上的關懷。其次，「基本合法化要求」存在已經蘊含最朴素的自由主義的嫌疑。第三，恐懼的自由主義與基本合法化要求之間存在一種微妙的關係，可能會使Williams的理論出現漏洞。第四，政治道德主義書寫的對象為當下多元社會中的讀者，其所使用的方法可以被視為一種修辭。
Bernard Williams is one of the most representative scholars among the trend of political realism in contemporary political philosophy. He criticized political moralism for it makes moral prior to the political, advocated the political should be given more autonomy. He proposed the "Basic Legitimation Demand" as the normative source in politics, combined with modernity as a condition, to create a new approach toward liberalism. This thesis reviews Williams`s ideas of legitimation and modernity by examining his theory, and explores his insights on the methodology of political theory. While endorsing and appreciating Williams`s claims and acknowledging the uniqueness of his methodological concern, the following criticisms remain. First of all, Williams’s understanding of "the political" already contains moral concern. Second, "Basic Legitimation Demand" implies an elementary view of liberalism. Third, there is a subtle relationship between the liberalism of fear and Basic Legitimation Demand that could make Williams`s theory flawed. Fourth, political moralism is written for the readers of contemporary pluralistic society, and the methods used can be regarded as a kind of rhetoric. |
| Reference: | 英文部分
Baderin, A. (2013). Two Forms of Realism in Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory,0(0), 1-22.
Bavister‐Gould, A. (2013). Bernard Williams: Political Realism and the Limits of Legitimacy. European Journal of Philosophy, 21(4), 593-610.
Bellamy, R. (2010). Dirty Hands and Clean Gloves: Liberal Ideals and Real Politics. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 412-430.
Chappell, Sophie Grace, "Bernard Williams", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/williams-bernard/>.
Erman, E and Möller, N. (2015). Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political. British Journal of Political Science, 45(01), 215-233.
Flathman, R. (2010). In and Out of the Ethical: The Realist Liberalism of Bernard Williams. Contemporary Political Theory, 9(1), 77-98.
Floyd, J and Stears, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political Philosophy versus History?: Contextualism and Real Politics in Contemporary Political Thought. Cambridge University Press
Freeden, M. (2012). Interpretative Realism and Prescriptive Realism. Journal of Political Ideologies, 17(1), 1-11.
Forrester, K. (2012). Judith Shklar, Bernard Williams and Political Realism. European Journal of Political Theory, 11(3), 247-272.
Galston, W. A. (2010). Realism in Political Theory. European journal of political theory, 9(4), 385-411.
Geuss, R. (2001). History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge University Press.
-----------. (2008). Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton University Press.
Gray, J. (1995). Liberalism, 2nd.ed, University of Minnesota Press.
---------. (2002). Two Faces of Liberalism. The New Press.
Hall, E. (2015). Bernard Williams and the Basic Legitimation Demand: a Defence. Political Studies, 63(2), 466-480.
---------. (2013). The Limits of Bernard Williams`s Critique of Political Moralism. Ethical perspectives, 20(2), 217-243.
Hawthorn, G. (2005). Introduction. In the Beginning Was the Deed, by Bernard Williams, i-xx. Princeton University Press.
Honig, B and Stears, M. (2011). The New Realism: From Modus Vivendi to Justice. Political Philosophy versus History, 177-205. Cambridge University Press.
Hobbes, T. (1998). Leviathan, Oxford University Press.
Larmore, C. (2012). What Is Political Philosophy?. Journal of Moral Philosophy. DOI 10.1163/174552412X628896.
Leopold, D and Stears, M. (2008). Political Theory: Methods and Approaches. Oxford University Press.
List, Christian, and Laura Valentini.(2016) .The Methodology of Political Theory. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford University Press.
North, R. (2010). Political Realism: Introduction. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 381-384.
Philp, M. (2007). Political Conduct. London: Harvard University Press.
Pippin, R. B. (2007). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. The Journal of Philosophy, 104(10), 533-539.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 5.
----------. (2005). Political Liberalism, expanded edition. Columbia University Press.
Ross, S. (2009). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. Essays in Philosophy, 10(2), 3.
Rossi, E. (2015). Can Realism Move Beyond a Methodenstreit?. Political Theory, 1-11.
----------. and Sleat, M. (2014). Realism in Normative Political Theory. Philosophy Compass, forthcoming.
Sagar, P. (2015). From Scepticism to Liberalism? Bernard Williams, the Foundations of Liberalism and Political Realism. Political Studies, 1467-9248.
Schmitt, C. (1996). The Concept of Political, The University of Chicago Press.
Shklar, J. (1989). The Liberalism of Fear. Political Liberalism: Variations on a Theme, 149-166.
Sigwart, H. J. (2013). The Logic of Legitimacy: Ethics in political realism. The Review of Politics, 75(03), 407-432.
Sleat, M. (2010). Bernard Williams and the Possibility of a Realist Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory, 9(4), 485-503.
----------. (2014). Legitimacy in Realist Thought: Between Moralism and Realpolitik. Political Theory, 0090591714522250.
----------. (2015). Justice and Legitimacy in Contemporary Liberal Thought. Social theory and practice, 41(2), 230-252.
Smart, J.J.C and Williams, B. (1973). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press.
Stemplowska, Z. (2008). What`s Ideal about Ideal Theory?. Social Theory and Practice, 34(3), 319-340.
Valentini, L. (2012). Ideal vs. Non‐ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map. Philosophy Compass, 7(9), 654-664.
Williams, B. (2011). Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Taylor & Francis.
--------------- & Hawthorn, G. (2005). In the Beginning was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument. Princeton University Press.
---------------. (1981). Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973-1980. Cambridge University Press.
----------------. (1993). Shame and Necessity. University of California Press.
----------------. (2002). Truth & Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton University Press.
Wolff, J. (2006). An Introduction to Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Yack, B. (2006). Review of the book In the Beginning Was the Deed: Realism and Moralism in Political Argument, by Bernard Williams. Ethics, 116(3), 615-618.
中文部分
卡爾・施密特 著，劉小楓 編，劉宗坤等 譯，《政治的概念》，上海人民出版社，2004 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
102252030 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102252030 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [政治學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 203001.pdf | 6735Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 356 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
