English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 94559/125088 (76%)
Visitors : 29788488      Online Users : 486
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/105846
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/105846


    Title: 專利權排除侵害之相對性與衡平法理-以智慧財產法院100年度民專上字第57號判決為例
    Other Titles: Relative Prevention of Patent Infringement and Equitable Jurisprudence- In terms of Zhi Hui Cai Chan Fa Yuan 100 Nian Du Min Zhuan Shang Zi Di 57 Hao Pan Jue
    Authors: 沈宗倫
    Shen, Chung-Lun
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 專利權、侵害、排除侵害、侵害除去請求權、侵害防止請求權、誠實信用、衡平
    Patent Infringement、Paragraph 1 of Article 96 of Taiwan Patent Act、Permanent Injunction、Equitable Factors、The Right to Exclude Patent Infringement、The Right to Prevent Patent Infringement、Good Faith
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2017-01-17 16:01:22 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文是以智慧財產法院一○○年度民專上字第五七號判決為例,闡述專利法第九六條第一項之侵害除去請求權與侵害防止請求權等救濟之准許與否,除以專利侵權是否成立為判斷因素外,尚須考慮衡平之因素,確定該等請求的必要,始能強化排除侵害的正當性。否則,機械且概念的解釋第九六條之救濟請求,將可能創造專利權人過度補償的危險,更有可能無形中排擠其他技術的貢獻,甚至影響專利技術的再創新與改良。
    Based upon the decision of Taiwan IP Court, Zhi Hui Cai Chan Fa Yuan 100 Nian Du Min Zhuan Shang Zi Di 57 Hao Pan Jue, this article argued that besides the factor of the risk for patent infringement, in order to determine if the permanent injunction is granted, the equitable factors should be considered to justify the injunction under Paragraph 1 of Article 96 of Taiwan Patent Act. Otherwise, the mechanic interpretation of Paragraph 1 of Article 96 will produce the risk of overcompensation for the patentee under patent law, and even squeeze the opportunities to have the improvement or follow-on innovation on the patented technologies.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, 253, 181-209
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102559312016060253013
    DOI: 10.3966/102559312016060253013
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML427View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback