Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/106916
|
| Title: | 協力治理、網絡結構與政策擴散： 以中國大陸森林認證政策為例
Examining collaborative governance, network structure & policy diffusion: the case of forest certification policy in China |
| Authors: | 謝儲鍵
Hsieh, Chu Chien |
| Contributors: | 顏良恭
Yen, Liang Kung
謝儲鍵
Hsieh, Chu Chien |
| Keywords: | 協力治理
網絡結構
政策擴散
森林認證政策
Collaborative governance
Network structure
Policy diffusion
Forest certification policy |
| Date: | 2016 |
| Issue Date: | 2017-03-01 17:20:56 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 面對全球氣候急遽變遷的挑戰下，各國政府對於環境治理議題高度的重視與 關切。在1992年京都議定書制定後，國家透過彼此的規範制約，期望可減少二
氧化碳的排放與環境的破壞。然而，正式權威途徑的執行，對於經濟發展與環境
永續的趨避衝突，卻不見預期效益。爾後，森林認證概念倡議後，希冀以市場途 徑作為國際規範，進入各國的創新管道。而第一個透過非政府組織建立的FSC體系，在2001年經由WWF進入中國大陸推展認證項目。只是，西方的運作思維與原則框架，在中國大陸終究遭遇到體制與管理上的困境。2008年後，中國大陸政府除了主導國家體系CFCC外，也與PEFC在2014年正式達成互認的成果。本研究試圖從政策改變前與後，以兩個階段分析行動者協力合作的情況，網 絡互動與體系採用的擴散情況。
研究結果分為兩個部分，首先就問卷統計數據來看協力與體系採用的相關性。對於FSC而言，治理與規範性是行動者選擇採用與否的重要因素。也就是行動者選擇FSC是因為重視認證資源的獲取、非正式關係的信任度與公開透明的正式溝通管道。而對於PEFC而言，治理因素同樣重要，而受到行動者支持的是相互性因數。傘型認證體制的特性，共同分享資訊、資源，使得政策場域中的行動者支持 PEFC。然而，對於CFCC而言並沒有太大的差異性。而在協力與網絡互動的分析上，自主性成為影響的因數。代表政策場域中的行動者，重視管理協調與主導政策制定討論的過程。
第二，對於擴散因數與體系採用的相關檢定。對FSC而言，社會化是重要
的關鍵。政策制定行動者考慮的是體系鄰近性、市場偏好、企業喜好與國際組織 的支持。而採用CFCC的行動者，同樣認為社會化重要。表示，利益方瞭解這是一個市場遊戲，而CFCC得到PEFC的互認後，對國家體系保持肯定態度。然而，競爭因素與採用CFCC也具有顯著性。表示行動者瞭解在中國大陸，政府透過管制帶來的競爭情勢，因此選擇了CFCC體系。
第三，就社會網絡分析數據分析，來看組織協力與體系採用關係。以程度中
心性來看，在資源與專業知識面向，皆是從國際組織轉向政府部門。在影響力層
面，國際組織甚至在第二階段便消失。而正式途徑的合作，以政府及國際組織為
兩大群體。但在第二階段，政府集中性更高，而國際組織則愈趨降低。包括在信
任度上，國際非政府組織也是下降的情況。在結構洞分析方面，第一階段的資源
掮客是一個多元組織的分佈，到的第二階段則單一化，國際體系成為傳達訊息的
角色。在影響力方面，第二階段主要是政府的角色成為掮客，而國際組織傳達影
響力的功能消失。而在信度度方面，第二階段發現國際非政府組織與企業，反而
更突顯他們在非正式關係網絡中的掮客位置。影響信任網絡的因素，分析發現政 策制定過程的資訊分享是關鍵原因。
本論文認為國際規範不僅建立在行動者的合作上，更需要結合地方組織，透
過社區力量建立由下而上的互動網絡。尤其第一階段，中國大陸需要藉由國際力
量，協助國內政策制定。因此，給予行動一個大鳴大放的空間與環境。第二階段，
受到協商過程的困境，而形成權力收回的情況。再者，中國大陸對於非政治敏感
議題，並非完全恪守政治命令而行，來決定政策發展的方向。相反的，政府可相
對釋出部分的自主性給國際組織。然而，當遭遇話語權問題時，便會透過管制途
徑收回權力，是一種「妥協式的管制協力」。而擴散的效應則是源於政策場域中，
行動者對於政策的學習與社會化而成。本研究透過微觀的實證資料，對中國大陸
協力、擴散與網絡互動研究有興趣的學者，提供另一個角度的解釋。總結來說，
國際規範透過非政府組織的「非正式途徑」，從國外帶入國內，並同時垂直向上
與向下影響中央政府的決策，及提升草根的公民力量。以中國大陸經驗反思國際 政策治理理論，重構對於開發中國家的「迴力鏢效應 2.0」模式。
While facing the challenge of global climate change, each country puts much emphasis on environmental governance issues urgently. Since the Kyoto Protocol declared in 1992, the effective approach to resolve environmental crisis aims to regulate environmental standards and reduce emission of carbon dioxide through various air, forest and water management. However, the management efficiency is not obvious to enhance the sustainable target by formal authorities because of the conflict of economic development and environmental sustainability. The forest certification mechanism is an innovative business strategy to implement international norms into domestic governance. Particularly, FSC is successfully getting into China to develop systems through the strong support from international organizations and enterprises. On the other hand, FSC also confronted many obstacles in regulatory institution and management difficulties from Chinese registration and standard laws. Meanwhile, Chinese governments dominated in national system (CFCC) which had recognized with PEFC in 2014. This research analysis focused on the development of collaboration, network interaction and system adoption in two stages of policy change.
First, the statistical findings show that norm and governance factors are significant to actors in adoption of FSC which means that the policy makers emphasize on the resource, informal trust relationships and transparent formal communication. Also, governance is important to actors to adopt PEFC systems. Another influential factor is mutuality that actors prefer the umbrella mechanism of PEFC to share information and resources with more flexible institutions. Otherwise, the correlation of interval variable of collaboration and network interaction, the analysis shows that autonomy is the influential factor to affect the collaborative relationships among actors in policy domain. On the other side, the interactive relationship is not significantly correlated to system adoption and diffusion.
Second, about the results of diffusion and system adoption, socialization is a crucial element to support FSC because of system approximation, market preferences and INGO support. To CFCC adopters, socialization is also a significant factor to them which means that they understand the certification system is a global market game. After CFCC recognized with PEFC, policy-domain actors approve CFCC. Meanwhile, competition is a considerable dimension to actors by regulatory approach by central governments.
Finally, based on network analysis of centrality, the high-central actors transformed to governmental actors from international NGOs in the second stage. Meanwhile, INGOs disappeared in influential factor. As for formal collaborative relationship, the public sectors and INGOs are two main groups. However, the public sectors are more central, but INGO are more peripheral. Also, the trust centrality of INGOs descends since CFCC and PEFC recognized. Of the structural-constraint analysis, the resource brokers are multiple in the first stage, but more homogeneous to public sector then. In policy-influence dimension, the governmental organizations are still main brokers in the second stage, and INGOs disappeared. The trust brokers are INGO and private sectors that highlight their informal relationships in the broker network. The Chinese governments release the approach of “airing views freely” to INGOs and multinational corporations in the first stage, and take back the autonomous right in second one because of “political baselines”.
In conclusion, this research argues that collaborative governance not only requires the legitimacy of international norms and rules implemented to domestic markets, but also integrates more local actors in policy-making process to enhance the efficiency. Chinese governmental actors are willing to cooperate with others by releasing more power and autonomy. However, they also take back the power while they lose the power of discourse which means that it is “negotiable regulation and collaboration”. Moreover, the research results reform the “Boomerang Effect 2.0” to rethink about another vertical effect of INGOs power bringing into domestic central governments and local civil society. |
| Reference: | 王光旭（民102）。社會網絡分析在公共政策權力途徑上應用之初探：以全民健保的重要政策事件為例。行政暨政策學報，57，37-90。
王光旭（民103）。網絡研究在公共行政領域的反思與前瞻：期刊文獻的回顧。人文與社會科學簡訊，15（3），132-139。
王光旭（民104）。社會網絡分析在公共行政領域研究的應用。調查研究-方法與應用，34，67-134。
王信賢（民99）。當代中國『國家－社會』關係的變與常：以環保組織的發展為例。政治學報，49，1-39。
加拿大林業協會（民97）。加拿大的森林認證。 http://www.cetrans.com/PDF/Chinese%20Simplified%20FPAC.pdf.
李仲彬（民99）。影響全球電子治理發展的因素：以政策擴散理論為基礎的分析。公共行政學報，36，39-89。
宋學文（民90）。全球化與全球治理對我國公共政策研究之影響：並兼論對兩岸關係研究之意涵。中國大陸研究，44（4），1-31。
杜文苓、陳致中（民96）。民眾參與公共決策的反思：以竹科宜蘭基地設置為例。 臺灣民主季刊， 4（3），33-62。
林子倫 （民97）。台灣氣候變遷政策之論述分析。公共行政學報，28，153- 175。
許禎元（民92）。內容分析法的研究步驟與在政治學領域的應用。師大政治論叢，創刊號，1-29。
游美惠（民89）。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究，8，5-42。
吳俊賢、林俊成（民102）。美國森林認證參訪經驗分享。林業研究專訊，20（1），40-45。
吳得源（民95）。全球治理在公共政策理論發展之擴充。行政暨政策學報，42，1-36。
沈玲、曾勳、謝冬明（民99）。世界森林認證的發展現狀及對中國森林認證的啟示。 江西林業科技，2010（1），32-36。
柯佩均、熊瑞梅、盧科位（民101）。台灣社會學門專業期刊間引用網絡之結構分析。教育資料與圖書館學，49（4），533-561。
黃裕星、吳俊賢、何政坤、吳孟玲、林俊成、陳芬蕙（民102）。林業試驗所研究團隊美國考察森林認證、森林健康及混農林業報告。林業試驗所出國考察報告。臺北市：林業局。
世界自然基金會（WWF）（民92）。北美最大的FSC認證森林。森林認證通訊，2，31-32。
彭俊亨、吳政峰、王俊元（民99）政策擴散下的創新治理：台灣工藝研究發展中心之經驗與啟發。國家與社會，8，99-156。
李仲彬（民99）。影響全球電子治理發展的因素：以政策擴散理論為基礎的分析。公共行政學報，36，39-89。
李長晏（民94）。我國府際合作治理之分析模式。收錄於中區府際合作公共論壇論文集。台中市：中興大學。
李長晏（民98）。協力治理觀的都會治理能力建構：一個分析架構的提出。府際關係研究通訊，6，7-12。
李長晏（民98）。府際協力治理政策工具之設計與選擇。研習論壇，101，24-38。
李長晏、林煥笙（民98）。中央與地方協力夥伴關係之分析－以台中縣潭子段旱溪整治工程爲例。公共行政學報，31，49-100。
李長晏（民98）。從協力治理模式探討淡水河流域的管理。中國地方自治，6（10），3-19。
朱旭峰（民97）。市場轉型對中國環境治理結構的影響－國家污染物減排指標的分配機制研究。中國人口資源與環境，18（6），80-86。
杜輝（民105）。論環境私主體治理的法治進路與制度建構。華東政法大學學報，201603，119-128。
范倉海（民100）。中國轉型期水環境治理中的政府責任研究。中國人口資源與環境，21（9），1-7。
郎友興、葛維萍（民98）。影響環境治理的地方性因素調查。中國人口資源與環境，19（3），頁107-112。
陳恆鈞、張國偉（民95）。組織協力與組織績效之研究:以雲林縣蔬菜產銷班為 例。公共行政學報，19，1-54。
羅彥傑、葉長城、劉嘉薇（民100）。16個開發中國家電信私有化的政治分析：以黨派、政府與國際因素為中心。社會科學論叢，5（2），83-134。
周雪光（民92）。組織社會學十講。北京：社會科學文獻出版社。
劉 軍（民98）。整體網分析講義。上海：格致出版社。
劉曉峰（民100）。社會資本對中國環境治理績效影響的實證分析。中國人口資源與環境，21（3），20-24
孫本初、鍾京佑（民95）。從地方政府到地方治理：網絡治理之分析。中國地方自治，59（4），33-54。
陸軍、周侃侃、於海霞、唐榮強（民101）。出口商品技術指南（木製品）。
取自：http://big5.mofcom.gov.cn/gate/big5/policy.mofcom.gov.cn/export/woodproducts/c6.action。
羅彥傑、葉長城、劉嘉薇（民100）。16個開發中國家電信私有化的政治分析：以黨派、政府與國際因素為中心。社會科學論叢，5（2），83-134。
熊瑞梅、紀金山（民91）。「師資培育法」形成的政策範疇影響力機制。台灣社會學，4，199-246。
熊瑞梅、王光旭（民101）。政策網絡中的對偶互動及其解釋因素：以台中市都市發展政策的菁英網絡為例，1986-1992。政治科學論叢，51，1-50。
顏良恭、謝儲鍵（民101年11月）。森林監管委員會在中國之發展-多層次治理觀點。史美強（主持人），社會暨公共事務國際學術研討會-提升城市競爭力和治理能力。臺北市：臺北市立教育大學。
顏良恭、謝儲鍵（民102年5月）。全球治理對國內永續森林認證政策制定之影響：以森林監管委員會（FSC）在中國的發展為例。湯京平（主持人），第九屆兩岸四地公共管理研討會。臺北市：政治大學。
顏良恭、謝儲鍵（民104）。國際非政府組織：森林監管委員會在中國之發展。中國大陸研究，58（1），29-64。
廖洲棚、陳敦源、廖興中（民102）。揭開地方政府回應民眾的秘箱：台灣六都1999專線的質化分析。文官制度季刊，5（1），49-84。
鄭端耀（民86）。國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析。問題與研究，36，1-22。
葉名容、廖吟梅（民103）。臺美林業經營技術協助訓練計畫美國林務署森林永續經營管理、育林營林模式。行政院農業委員會林務局短期出國研習報告。
陸文明、趙劼（2004）。森林認證的現狀與發展趨勢。世界林業研究，17（1），1-7。
謝俊義（民96）。公共網絡管理：臺北市政府戶政業務跨機關服務傳遞協力合作網絡實證研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。
謝儲鍵、陳敦源（民105）。虛擬網絡行動者角色與政策審議品質關係之研究：一個應用社會網絡分析法的探索。民主與治理，3（1），63-109。
Abbott, K. W., & Duncan, S. (2001). International ‘‘Standards’’ & International Governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(3): 345-370. doi: 10.1080/13501760110056013.
Abzug, R., & Galaskiewicz , J. (2001). Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise or symbols of local identities? Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 51-73. doi: 10.1177/0899764001301003.
Acharya, A. (2004). How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? International Organization, 58(2), 239-275. doi: 10.1017/S0020818304582024.
Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside Collaborative network: Ten Lessons for Public Managers [Special section]. Public Administration Review, 66, 56-65.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire., M. (1998). Multinetwork Management: Collaboration and the Hollow State in Local Economics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(1), 67-92. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024374.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire., M. (1999). Expanding Intergovernmental Management’s Hidden Dimensions. American Review of Public Administration, 29(40), 253-269.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire., M. (2001). After the network is formed: Process. Power and performance. In M. P. Mandell (Ed). Getting results through collaboration: Networks and network structures for public policy and management (pp, 11-29). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Agranoff, R., & McGuire., M. (2003). Inside the Matrix: Integrating the Paradigms of Intergovernmental & Network Management. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(2), 1401-22.
Ahrens, N. (2013). China’s Competitiveness: Myth, Reality, and Lessons from the United States and Japan: Case Study: Huawei. CSIS Working Papers. Retrieved from :// csis.org/program/ chinas-competitveness.
Amandine, J. B. (2009). Business to the rescue: private sector actors & global environmental regimes’ legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law & Economics, 9, 2153-2171.
Amenta, E., & Caren, N. (2004). The Legislative, Organizational, & Beneficiary Consequences of State-Oriented Challenges, in A. D. Snow, A. S. Soule, & H. Kriesi (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (pp. 466-488). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Amitai, E. (1975). A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations. New York: Free Press.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory & Practice. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 18(4), 543-571.
Anderson, E. J. (2000). Public Policymaking: An Introduction. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
Arino, A. & Torre, de, J. (1998). Learning from Failure: Towards an Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures. Organization Science, 9(3), 306-325.
Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, D. W. (1992). Policy Networks, Polocy Communities & the Problems of Governance. Governance, 5(2), 154-180.
Barbier, E. D., & Leonard, D. (2005). Corruption, Trade & resource conversion. Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 50(2), 229-246.
Babbie, E. (1995). The Practice of Social Research [Seventh Edition]. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Backstrand, K. (2006). Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholer Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development. European Journal of International Relations, 12(4), 467-498.
Barabási, A-L., & Albert, Réka. (1999). Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.
Science, 286(5439), 509-512. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
Barnett, A. D. (1967). Cadres, Bureaucracy, & Political Power in Communist China. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. (1990). Managing innovation in the transnational corporation, in Bartlett, A. C., Doz, Y., & Hedlund, G. (eds), Managing the Global Firm, London, England: Routledge, 215-255.
Barelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
Barkdull, J., & Harris, P. G. (2009). Theories of Environmental Foreign Policy: Power, Interests, & Ideas, in Paul G. Harris, Environmental Change & Foreign Policy, 19-40.
Burstein, P. (1991). Policy Domains: Organisation, Culture, and Policy Outcomes. Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 327-50. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001551.
Bas, A., & Leroy, P. (2006). Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. Netherlands: Springer Publisher.
Bavelas, A. (1948). A Mathematical Model for Group Structures. Human Organization, 7, 16-30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.7.3.
f4033344851gl053.
Bemelmans-Videc, M. L., Rist, R.C., & Vedung, E. (eds) (1998). Carrot, Sticks & Sermons, Policy Instruments & Their Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bennett, A. J. (2008). Gene environment interplay: nonhuman primate models in the study of resilience & vulnerability. Development of Psychobiology, 50(1), 48-59.
Bernd, M., & Mayntz, R. (1992). Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2000). Globalization, four paths of internationalization & domestic policy change: The case of eco-forestry in British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 67-99.
Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2007). Can Non-state Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework. Regulation & Governance, 1, 347-371.
Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex Global Governance & Domestic Policies: Four Pathways of Influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585-604.
Bernstein, S., & Hannah, E. (2008). Non-State Global Standard Setting & the WTO: Legitimacy & the Need for Regulation Space. Journal of International Economic Law, 11(3), 575-608.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1990). State lottery adoption as policy innovations: An event history analysis. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 395-415.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation & diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169-200). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation & diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 223-260). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Boehmke, F. J. (2009). Policy Emulation or Policy Convergence? Potential Ambiguities in the Dyadic Event History Approach to State Policy Emulation. The Journal of Politics, 71, 1125-1140. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090926.
Boehmke, F. J., & Witmer, R. (2004). Disentangling diffusion. The effects of social learning & economic competition on state policy innovation & expansion. Political Research Quarterly, 57(1), 39-51. doi: 10.1177/106591290405700104.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal., E. T. (2003). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, & Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Boushey, G. (2010). Policy Diffusion Dynamics in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvad University Press.
Bouslah, K., M’Zali, B., Turcotte, M-F., Kooli, M. (2010). The Impact of Forest Certification on Firm Financial Performance in Canada and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 551-572. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0482-5.
Bozeman, B. (1993). Public management: The state of the art. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Braun, D., & Gilardi, F. (2006). Taking Galton`s Problem` Seriously: Towards a Theory of Policy Diffusion. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 18(3), 298-322. doi: 10.1177/0951629806064351.
Breiger, R. L. (1976). Career attributes & network structure: A blockmodel study of a biomedical research speciality. American Sociological Review, 41(1), 117-135. doi: 10.1177/004912417800700201.
Brewer, L. T. (2009). Pluralistic Politics & Public Choice: Theories of Business & Government Responses to Climate Change. In Harris, G. P., Environmental Change & Foreign Policy, 57-73.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B., & Stone, M. (2006). The Design & Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 44-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.
Brandes, U., Schneider, V., & Wagner, D. (1999). Explorations into the Visualization of Policy Networks. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 75-89.
Burstein, P. (1991). Policy Domains: Organization, Culture, & Policy Outcomes. Annual Reviews of Sociology, 17, 327-350.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burt, R. S. (1982). Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, & Action. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cao, X. (2009). Networks of International Organizations & Convergence in Domestic Economic Policies. International Studies Quarterly, 53, 1095-1130.
Cao, X. (2010). Networks as Channels of Policy Diffusion: Explaining Worldwide Changes in Capital Taxation, 1998-2006. International Studies Quarlerly, 54(3), 823-854. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00570.
Cashore, B. (1999). US Pacific Northwest. In B. Wilson et al. (Eds), Forest Policy: International Case Studies (pp, 47-80). Oxon, England: CABI Publication.
Cashore, B., Vertinsky, I. (2000). Policy networks and firm behaviours: Governance systems and firm reponses to external demands for sustainable forest management. Policy sciences, 33(1), 1-30.
Cashore, B., Fred, G., Meidinger, E., & Newsom, D. (2006). Confronting Sustainability: Forest Certification in Developing & Transitioning Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale F & ES Publication.
Cauley, A. H., Peters, M. C., Donovan, Z. R., & O’Connor M. J. (2001). Forest Stewardship Council Forest Certification. Conservation Biology, 15(2) , 311-312. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015002311.x.
Cherrett, K. (1994). Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Partnering. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 53(1), 8-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.1994.tb01851.
Chen, B. (2004). Assessing family preservation network collaboration in Los Angeles County: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at the Association for Public Analysis & Management Annual Fall Research Conference. Atlanta: GA, October 28-30.
Chen , B., & Graddy, E. A. (2005). Inter-Organizational Collaborations For Public Service Delivery: A Framework of Preconditions, Processes, & Perceived Outcomes. Paper presented at the 2005 ARNOVA Conference, November 17-19, Washington, DC.
Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of Cooperation: Managing Alliances, Networks, and Joint Ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 404-406. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199266241.001.0001
Chiles, H. T., & McMackin, F. J. (1996). Integrating Variable Risk Preferences, Trust, and Transaction Cost Economics. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 73-99. doi:10.2307/258630.
Chou, K. P. (2009). Government & Policy-Making Reform in China. New York, NY: Routledge.
Cohn, B. S., & Marriott, M. (1958). Networks and Centres of Integration in Indian Civilization. Journal of Social Research, I, 1-9.
Counsell, S., & Loraas, K. T. (2002). Trading in credibility: The myth and reality of the Forest Stewardship Council. London, England: The Rainforest Foundation.
Cropper, S. (1996). Collaborative Working & the Issue of Sustainability. In C. Huxham, Creating Collaborative Advantage (pp. 80-100). Thous& Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
Crosby , B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005a). Leadership for the Common Good: Tackling Public Problems in a Shared-Power World (2nd ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Crosby , B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005b). A Leadership Framework for Cross-Sector Collaboration. Public Management Review, 7(2), 177-201. doi: 10.1080/14719030500090519.
Daley, D. M., & Garand, J. C. (2005). Horizontal diffusion, vertical diffusion, & internal pressure in state environmental policymaking, 1989-1998. American Politics Research, 33(5), 615-644.
Davis, J. A. (1970). Clustering & Hierarchy in interpersonal relations: Testing two theoretical models on 742 sociograms. American Sociological Review, 35, 843-852. doi: 10.2307/2093295.
DeLeon, P., & Varda, D. M. (2009). Toward a Theory of Collaborative Policy Networks: Identifying Structural Tendencies. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 59-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00295.x.
Delacote, P. (2012). Forest & Development, Local, National & Global Issues. New York, NY: Routledge.
Delmas, A. M., & Young, R. O. (2009). Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
De Vries, S. M. (2010). The Importance of Neglect in Policy-Making. Palgrave, England: Macmillan Publishers.
Dobbin, F., Simmons, B., & Garrett, G. (2007). The global diffusion of public polices: Social construction, coercion, competition, or learning? Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 449-472.
Dowding, K. (1995). Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies, 68, 136-158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1995.tb01705.
Dolowitz, D. (2000). Policy Transfer & British Social Policy: Learning from the USA? Basingstoke: Open University Press.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who Learns What from Whom: a Review of the Policy Transfer Literature. Political Studies, 44, 343-357. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 15-24. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00121.
Dye, T. R. (2004). Understanding Public Policy, Upper Saddle River. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Economy, E., & Oksenberg, M. (1999). China Joins the World: Progress & Prospects. New York, NY: Council on Foreign Relations.
Elkins, Z., Guzman, A., & Simmons, B. (2005). Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000. International Organization, 60(4), 811-846. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060279.
Etzioni, A. (1975). A comprehensive analysis of complex organizations. New York, NY: Free Press.
Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norms Dynamics & Political Change. International Organizations, 52(4), 887-917. doi:10.1162/002081898550789.
Fiorino, D. (1991). Dimension of negotiated rulemaking: Practical constraints & theoretical implications. In Nagel, S. S., & Mills, M. K., System Analysis in Dispute Resolution. New York, NY: Quorum Books.
Frederickson, H. G., & Smith, K. B. (2003). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.
Franzese, R. J. Jr, & Hays, J. C. (2008). Interdependence in Comparative Politics. Substance, Theory, Empirics, Substance. Comparative Political Studies,
41, 742-780. doi: 10.1177/0010414007313122.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Fernholz, K., Howe, J., Bratkovich, S., & Bowyer, J. (2011). Differences between the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) & Sustainable. Presented at Dovetail Partners, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.sfiprogram.org/files/pdf/dovetailfscsficomparison32811pdf/
Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The Diffusion of Policy Diffusion Research in Political Science. British Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 673-701. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000415.
Galaskiewicz, J., & Wasserman, S. (1989). Mimetic processes within an interorganizational field: An empirical test. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 454-479. doi:10.1177/097215090700900103.
Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts & Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510. doi: 10.1086/228311.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gerring, J. (2009). Case Study Research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Greenhill, B. (2010). The Company You Keep: International Socialization & the Diffusion of Human Rights Norms. International Studies Quarterly, 54, 127-145. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00580.
Gilardi, F. (2010). Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes? American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 650-666. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00452.
Gilardi, F. (2012). Transnational Diffusion: Norms, Ideas, & Policies. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. Simmons, Handbook of International Relations (2nd edtion), pp. 453-477. New York, NY: Sage Publications.
Gilardi, F. (2013). Four thoughts on the future of policy diffusion research. http://poliscizurich.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/four-thoughts-on-the-future-of-policydiffusion-research/. Accessed in 03/21/2014
Goldsmith, S., & Eggers, D. W. (2004). Governing bynetwork The new shape of the public sector. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
Gulter, I., Gullen, M.F., & MacPherson, J.M. (2002). Global Competition, Institutions, & the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The international spread of ISO9000 Quality Certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 321-337.
Graddy, E. A., & Chen, B. (2006). The consequences of partner selection in service delivery collaborations. Paper presented at the Syracuse University’s Collaborative Public Management Conference. Washington, DC, September 28-30.
Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning with International Strategic Alliances. Strategic management Journal, 12, 83-103.
Hailey, H. V. (2000). Strategic Human Resource Management: Corporate Rhetoric & Human Reality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Hall, P. A. (1992). The movement from Keynesianism to monetarism: Institutional analysis & British economic policy in the 1970s’. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Long-streth (Eds), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (pp. 90-113). CamHeclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Britain & Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Heritier, A. (1999). Policy-Making & Diversity in Europe: Escape from Deadlock .Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hedlund, G. (1994). A model of knowledge management and the n-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 73-91. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250151006.
Hilderbrand, M. E., & Grindle, M. S. (1997). Building Sustainable Capacity in the Public Sector: What Can Be Done. Public Administration and Development, 15(5), 441-463.
Holland, P. W., Laskey, K. B., & Leinhardt, S. (1983). Stochastic Blockmodels: First Steps. Social Networks, 5, 109-137.
Howell, J. (2006). Reflections on the Chinese. State Development & Change, 37(2), 273-297. doi: 10.1080/21598282.2011.566036.
Hubbell, C. H. (1965). An Input-Output Approach to Clique Identification. Sociometry, 28, 377-399.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to Collaborate: the Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. New York, NY: Routledge.
Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks: a comparative study of success & demise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 327-65.
Hrebenar, J., & Thomas, C. S. (2004). Interest Group Politics in the Northeastern States Paperback. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Ingram, P. & H., Rao (2004). Store Wars. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 446-487.
Inkpen, A. (1995). Organizational learning and international joint ventures. Journal of International Management, 1(2), 165-198.
Isett, K., & Provan, K. G. (2005). The Evolution of Dyadic Interorganizational Relationships in a Network of Publicly Funded Nonprofit Agencies. Journal of Public Administration & Theory, 15(1), 149-165. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui008.
Jacobson, H. K., & Oksenberg, M. (1990). China`s Participation in the IMF, the World Bank, & GATT: Toward a Global Economic Order. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Jacoby, W. (2000). Imitation & politics: Redesigning modern Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Jakobi, A. P. (2009). International Organizations & Lifelong Learning: From Global Agendas to Policy Diffusion. England: Palgrave Macmillan Publishers.
Jarillo, J. C. (1988). On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 31-41. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250090104.
Jiang, Y. (2010). Changing Patterns of Chinese Policy-Making on Regionalism. The Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies, 28(1), 109-130.
Jones , C., Hesterly, W., & Borgatti, S. (1997). A General theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions & Social Mechanisms . Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911-945. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022109.
Johnson, E. C. (1985). Network macrostructure models for the Davis-Leinhardt set of empirical sociometrices. Social Networks, 7, 203-224. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00179.
Josserand, E. (2004). Cooperation within Bureaucracies: Are Communities of Practice an Answer? [Special issue]. Management, 7(3), 307-339. doi: 10.3917/mana.073.0307.
Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. R. (Eds) (2003). New Instruments of Environmental Governance? London, England: Routledge.
Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance. Oxford, Enfgland: Oxford University Press.
Kahler, M. (2009). Networked Politics: Agency, Power, & Governance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Kajiwara, A. (2003). Forest Certification & Social Change: A Comprehensive Study in Japan. Research Institute for Economics and Business Administration, JP: Kobe University Press.
Karch, A. (2007). Democratic Laboratories : Policy Diffusion among the American States. Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press
Karns, M. P., & Mingst, K. A. (2004). International Organizations: The Politics & Processes of Global Governance. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Kastan, J. (2000). School-Based Mental Health Program Development: A Case Study of Inter-organizational Collaboration. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law, 25(5), 845-862 . doi: 10.1177/001872678503801001.
Kennedy, S. (2005). The Business of Lobbying in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Knill, C. (2005). Introduction: Cross-national policy convergence: concepts, approaches & explanatory factors. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 764-774. doi: 10.1080/13501760500161332.
Knoke, D., & Kuklinski. J. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Krackhardt, D. (1994) .Graph Theoretical Dimensions of Informal Organizations." In Kathleen Carley & Michael Prietula (Eds.), Computational Organizational Theory (pp. 89-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associaties, Inc.
Klitgaard, R., & Treverton, F. G. (2003). Assessing Partnerships: New Forms of Collaboration. Retrieved from IBM Endowment for the Business of Government website: https://blackboard.angelo.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/LFA/CSS/Course%20Material/BOR6301/Readings/New_collaboration_forms.pdf
Krahmann, E. (2003). Multilevel Networks in Foreign Policy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997). Managing Complex Networks. London, England: Sage.
Keck, E. M., & Sikkink., K. (1999). Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International Social Science Journal, 51(159), 89-101. doi: 10.1111/1468-2451.00179.
Kjær, M. A. (2004). Governance. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Krook, M. L., & True, J. (2010). Rethinking the life cycles of international norms: The United Nations & the global promotion of gender equality. European Journal of International Relations, 18(1), 103-127. doi: 10.1177/1354066110380963.
Kenis, P., & Schneider, V. (1991). Policy Networks & Policy Analysis: Scrutinizing a new analytical Toolbox. In B. Marin, & R. Mayntz (Eds.), Policy Networks. Empirical Evidence & Theoretical Considerations (pp. 25-59). Germany: Frankfurt/M, Campus.
Kenis, P, & Provan, K. G. (2006). The Control of Public Networks. International Public Management Journal, 9 (3), 227-247. doi: 10.1080/10967490600899515.
Kent, A. E. (2007). Beyond Compliance: China, International Organizations, & Global Security, Studies in Asian Security. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kettl, D. F., & Milward, H. B. (1996). The state of public management. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
Kooiman. J. (2003). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Newbury Park, UK: Sage.
Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge Engl& & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., & Tsujinaka, Y. (1996). Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the U.S., Germany, and Japan. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lampton, D. M. (2001). The Making of Chinese Foreign & Security Policy in the Era of Reform, 1978-2000. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Wisconsin, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Laumann, E. O., & Pappi, F. U. (1976). Network of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence System. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Lardy, N. R. (1998). China`s Unfinished Economic Revolution. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Lieberthal, K., & Lampton, D. M. (1992). Bureaucracy, Politics, & Decision Making in Post-Mao China. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lee, C. K., & Strang, D. (2006). The international diffusion of public-sector downsizing: Network emulation & theory-driven learning. International Organization, 60, 883-909. doi: 10.1017/S0020818306060292.
Leinhardt, S. (1972). Developmental change in the sentiment structure of children’s groups. American Sociological Review, 37, 202-212.
Levine, S., & White, P. (1961). Exchange as a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Interorganizational Relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5, 583-601.
Liliana, B. A., & Hoffmann, M. J. (2012). From Rio to Rio & Beyond : Innovation in Global Environmental Governance. Journal of Environment & Development, 21(1), 57-61. doi: 10.1177/1070496511436278.
Lindblom, C. E. (1980). The Policy-Making Process. Englewood CliffS, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Lister, E. J. (2009). Co- Regulating Corporate Social Responsibility: Government Response to Forest Certification in Canada, The United States & Sweden. (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/787117/Co-regulating_corporate_social_responsibility_government_response_to_forest_certification_in_Canada_the_United_States_and_Sweden?auto=download
Lowi, T. J. (1969). The End of Liberalism. New York, NY: Norton.
Lu, N. (2000). The Dynamics of Foreign-Policy Decisionmaking in China. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Lynn, L. E. Jr. (1996). Public management as art, science, & profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Marsh, D., & Sharman, J. C. (2009). Policy Diffusion & Policy Transfer. Policy Studies, 30(3), 269-288. doi: 10.1080/01442870902863851.
McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It. Public Administration Review, 66 (1), 33-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1998). The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943-969. doi: 10.1162/002081898550699.
Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of Communication Networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Meseguer, C. (2004). What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD & Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy, 24(3):299-325.
Meseguer, C. (2005). Policy learning & Policy diffusion, & the Making of a New Order. Annual of the American Academy of Political & Social Science, 598: 67-82.
Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2009). What Is New in the Study of Policy Diffusion? Review of International Political Economy, 16(3), 527-543.
Meyer, J. W. (1988). Levels of Analysis: The Life Course as a Cultural Construction, in M. W. Riley (Ed.), Social Structures & Human Lives (pp. 49-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Mertha, A. C. (2008). China`s Water Warriors: Citizen Action and Policy Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). How Networks Are Governed. In L. Jr. Heinrich (Ed.), Governance and Performance: New Perspectives (pp. 238-262). Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2003). Managing the Hollow State Collaboration and Contracting. Public Management Review, 5(1), 1-18.
Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who Shall Survive? Washington. DC: Nervous & Mental Disease Publishing Company.
Moreno, J. L. (1937). Sociometry in Relation to Other Social Sciences. Sociometry, 1(1), 206-219. doi: 10.2307/2784908.
Moote, M. A. (2008). Collaborative Forest Management, in E. M. Donoghue & V. E. Sturtevant, Forest Community Connections: Implications for Research, Management, & Governance (pp. 185-204). Washington, D.C.: RFF Press.
Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of Communication Networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mossberger, K. (2000). The Diffusion of Innovations & the Spread of Enterprise Zones. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
Milner, H. V. (2003). The global spread of the internet: The role of international diffusion pressures in technology adoption. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Newmark, A. J. (2002). An integrated approach to policy transfer & diffusion. The Review of Policy Research, 19(2), 151-178. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2002.tb00269.
Newell, P. J., & Levy, D. L. (2006).The Political Economy of the Firm in Global Environmental Governance, in C. May (Ed.), Global Corporate Power (Vol. 15) (pp. 160-172). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Leary, R., Gazley, B., McGuire, M., & Bingham, L. B. (2009). Public Manager in Collaboration. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), The Collaborative Public Manager: New Ideas for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 1-14). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
O’ Toole, L. (1997). Treating Networks Seriously: Practical & Research Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45-52. doi:
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92, 1-22. doi:10.2307/2585925.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Ouchi, W. (1979). A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833-848.
Patel, M.K., Markatos, N.C., and Cross, M. (1985).Method of reducing false-diffusion errors in convection—diffusion problems. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 9(4), 302-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0307-904X(85)90069-1.
Pitts, F. R. (1979). The Medieval River Trade Network of Russia Revisited. Social Networks, I, 285-292. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90025-4.
Posner, P. (2009). Network in the Shadow of Government: the Chesapeake Bay. In S. Goldsmith & D. F. Kettl, Unlocking the power of networks: Keys to high-performance government (pp.62-94). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press,.
Provan, K. G. (1983). The federation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 8(1), 78-89. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1983.4287668.
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2005). Modes of Network Governance An Implications for Public Network Management. Paper presented at the Eighth National Public Management Research Conference, Los Angeles, CA. September, 29-October, 1.
Peters, G., & Pierre, L. (2005). Governing Complex Societies: Trajectories and
Scenarios. New York, NY: Palgrave.
Powell, W. (1990). Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings, Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 12 (pp. 295-336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2003). Government, A Public Administration Perspective. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity & Accountability. Buckingham,UK: Open University Press.
Resende-Santos, J. (2007). Neorealism, States, & the Modern Mass Army. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
Rose, R. (1991). What Is Lesson-Drawing? Journal of Public Policy, 11(1), 3-30. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00004918.
Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Policy-oriented Learning & Policy Change. Knowledge, 8, 649-692. doi: 10.1177/0164025987008004005.
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy Change & Learning, a Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization & Public-Private Partnerships. New York & London: Chatham House Publishers.
Schmid, A., & Götze, R. (2009). Cross-national policy learning in health system reform: The case of Diagnosis Related Groups [Special issue]. International Social Security Review, 62(4), 21-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01344.
Schneiberg, M. & Bartley, T. (2001). Regulating American industries: Markets, politics, & the institutional determinants of fire insurance regulation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 101-146. doi: 10.1086/323574.
Snow, D. (2001). Coming Home: An Introduction to Collaborative Conservation. In D. Snow (Ed.), Across the Great Divide: Explorations in Collaboration & the American West (pp. 1-11). Washington DC: Isl & Press.
Siegel, D. A. (2009). Social Networks & Collective Behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 122-138. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00486.x.
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2006). Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Antismoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States. American Journal of Political Science, 50(4), 825-843. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00218.x.
Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840-857. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00346.x.
Shimbel, A. (1953). Structural Parameters of Communication Networks. Bulletin of
Mathematical Biophysics, 15, 501-507. doi:10.1007/BF02476438.
Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2006). Introduction: the international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781-810. doi:10.1017/S0020818306060267.
Sharman, J. C. (2008). Power & discourse in policy diffusion: Anti-money laundering in developing states. International Studies Quarterly, 52(3), 635-656. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2008.00518.x.
Smith, M. J. (1993). Pressure, Power & Policy. New York, NY: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Stone, J., & Madigan, E. (2009). Policy Diffusion & Municipal Wireless Initiatives. Perspectives in Public Affairs, 6, 25-50.
Starke, P. (2013). Qualitative Methods for the Study of Policy Diffusion: Challenges & Available Solutions. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 561-582. doi: 10.1111/psj.12032
Strang, D. (1991). Adding Social-Structure to Diffusion-Models. An Event History Framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 19(3), 324-353. doi: 10.1177/0049124191019003003.
Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in Organizations & Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 265-290. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265.
Soule, S., & King, B. (2006). The stage of the policy process & the Equal Rights Amendment, 1972-1982. American Journal of Sociology, 6, 1871-1909. doi: 10.1086/499908.
Sullivan, H., & Skelcher, C. (2003). Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services. Health & Social Care in the Community, 11(2), 185-221. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.04183.x.
Thomson, A. M., Perry, L. J., & Miller, K. T. (2007). Conceptualizing & Measuring Collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 19, 23-56. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum036.
Thomson, A. M., & Perry, L. J. (1998). Can AmeriCorps build communities? Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 399-420. doi: 10.1177/0899764098274002.
Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801-843.
UNFF (2001). The United Nations Forum on Forests. IUFRO News, 30(1), 1-2. doi: 10.1080/714000519.
Van de Ven, A., & Walker, G. (1984). The Dynamics of Inter-organizational Coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 598-621.
Vigoda, E. (2002). From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Govemance, Citizens,& the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 531-548. doi: 10.1111/1540-6210.00235.
Volden, C. (2006). States as policy laboratories: emulating success in the children`s health insurance program American Journal of Political Science, 50(2): 294-312.
Vogel, D. (2008). Private Global Business Regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 261-282. doi:101146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.141706.
Walker, J. L. (1969). The Diffusion of Innovation among American States. American Political Science Review, 63: 880-899. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1954434.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods & Applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Wasserman, S., & Anderson, C. (1987). Stochastic A Posteriori Blockmodels: Construction & Assessment. Social Networks, 9: 1-36. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(87)90015-3.
Warren, R. L. (1967). The inter-organizational field as a focus for investigation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(3), 396-419. doi: 10.2307/2391312.
Wilson, C. C., & Gutierrez, F. (1995). Race, Multiculturalism, and the Media: From Mass to Class Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Weyland, K. (2005). Theories of Policy Diffusion: Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform. World Politics, 57(2), 262-295. doi: 10.1353/wp.2005.0019.
Wood, D., & Gray, B. (1991). Towards a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162. doi: 10.1177/0021886391272001.
Yang, L. H. (2016). Types and Institutional Design Principles of Collaborative Governance in a Strong-Government Society: The Case Study of Desertification Control in Northern China. International Public Management,19(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1080/10967494.2016.1141812.
Zeng, K. (2007). China`s Foreign Trade Policy: The New Constituencies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Zweig, D. (2002). Internationalizing China: Domestic Interests & Global Linkages. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. |
| Description: | 博士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
99256502 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0992565021 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 502101.pdf | 4851Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1029 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
