English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46272921      Online Users : 1332
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/108885


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/108885


    Title: 菲中「南海仲裁案」與海洋環境保護
    Other Titles: South China Sea Arbitration and Protection of Marine Environment
    Authors: 許耀明
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 南海仲裁;海洋環境;國際環境法
    South China Sea Arbitration、Marine Environment
    Date: 2016-09
    Issue Date: 2017-04-17 12:20:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文從菲律賓訴中國大陸之南海仲裁案出發，討論該案中關於海洋環境保護之相關法律問題。本案仲裁庭認為，中國大陸漁民對於瀕臨絕種之物種進行捕撈，以及中國大陸在南沙群島所進行之建設開發行為，造成海洋環境之破壞，且缺乏適當之環境影評估。此外，中國大陸於美濟礁開發行為，則侵害菲律賓於其經濟海域與大陸礁層之主權權利。本案乃國際間第一次針對海洋法公約中關於海洋環境保護之相關規定進行具體闡釋與適用，其將構成日後各國實踐海洋環境保護義務之重要指標。
    Based on the PCA South China Sea Arbitration case, this article discusses relevant disputes about the protection of marine environment. The tribunal considers that the harmful fishing practices and harvesting of endangered species under the jurisdiction and control of China and China’s construction activities on seven reefs in the Spratly Islands, caused damages to marine environment and thus breached relevant provision of the 1982 UNCLOS. Besides, the China’s occupation and construction activities on Mischief Reef also breached the UNCLOS with respect to the Philippines’ sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf. For the first time, the relevant provisions for marine environment protection in the UNCLOS have been interpreted and applied. This case will be guiding jurisprudence for future states practices for marine environment protection.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, 256, 34-42
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2503View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback