English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91280/121421 (75%)
Visitors : 25391091      Online Users : 57
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/109333

    Title: The development of indicators for creativity education and a questionnaire to evaluate its delivery and practice
    Authors: Ku, H.-C.;Burnard, P.;McLellan, R.;Cheng, Y.-Y.;Wu, Jingjyi
    Contributors: 創新與創造力中心
    Date: 2017-06
    Issue Date: 2017-05-08 14:34:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: This research aimed to develop a set of indicators for creativity education and a questionnaire to evaluate its delivery in Taiwan. Four research methods were systematically combined to develop the indicators and the questionnaire, including interviews, document analysis, onsite visits, and a survey. The indicator-informed questionnaire was then administered to a total of 1015 school administrators and teachers in Taiwan's primary and secondary schools (pre-test N = 397 and post-test N = 658). The results from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Structure Equation Modeling (SEM) revealed that the questionnaire had very good measurement properties with five interrelated latent variables, including creative teachers, creative students, creative campus, interdisciplinary practice, and creative database. The questionnaire's reliability was calculated at a Cronbach's alpha of 0.97, and the five subscales’ Cronbach alpha scores ranged from 0.82 to 0.95. Evidence revealed that the practice of creativity education program in Taiwan was very effective. Overall, among the five subscales, the creative student subscale had highest ratings (most helpful), whereas interdisciplinary practice subscale had the lowest ratings (least helpful). The questionnaire has great potential to be utilized in government, educational institutions, and other sectors as a reference tool to evaluate the delivery and practice of creativity education. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
    Relation: Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 186-198
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.005
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.005
    Appears in Collections:[創新與創造力研究中心 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-s2.0-S187118711730024X-main.pdf1231KbAdobe PDF348View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback