English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90029/119959 (75%)
Visitors : 24036205      Online Users : 201
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/110207
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110207


    Title: 心理幸福感量表簡式中文版信效度及測量不變性:以大學生為樣本並兼論測量不變性議題
    Other Titles: Reliability, Validity, and Measurement Invariance of the Brief Chinese Version of Psychological Well-Being Scale among College Students
    Authors: 李仁豪;余民寧
    Li, Ren-Hau;Yu, Min-Ning
    Contributors: 教育系
    Keywords: 心理幸福感;交叉效度;純量不變性;測量不變性;量尺不變性;cross validation;measurement invariance;metric invariance;psychological well-being;scalar invariance
    Date: 2016-08
    Issue Date: 2017-06-07 11:30:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的有二,一是獲得更多有關Li(2014)18題簡式中文版心理幸福感量表的信、效度訊息,二是進行跨樣本交叉效度及跨時間測量不變性的檢定。研究樣本有三套,以大學生為對象,分別命名為樣本一、樣本二及共同樣本,人數分別為442、349、394位參與者。以結構方程式模型技術來處理資料。研究發現,符合理論架構的六因素斜交模型獲得良好的適配;在信度方面,分量表內部一致性α係數在.73~.87,總量表高達.91;分量表間隔2~3週的再測信度介於.59~.65,總量表則達到.70。在效度方面,因素負荷量在.65~.92,具有聚斂效度,而因素間的相關性在.30~.72,通過區辨效度的檢驗。另外,跨樣本的交叉效度亦獲得一定程度的支持;而測量不變性檢驗亦獲得因素負荷量及截距在跨時間上符合量尺不變性及純量不變性的要求,有利於構念在跨時間上的因素間關係比較及因素平均數比較。 The two aims of this research were to obtain reliability and validity information of Li's (2014) 18-item brief Chinese version of the Psychological Well-Being Scale across samples, and to test its measurement invariance across time. Three samples of college students were recruited in the study. They were named as sample I, sample II, and common sample, in which 442, 349, and 394 students, respectively. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling techniques. Results showed that theoretical framework of six-factor oblique model had good model-fits. Cronbach's α coefficients ranged from .73 to .87 for subscale scores, and was .91 for the total score; 2 ~ 3 weeks test-retest reliability coefficients of subscale scores ranged .59 ~ .65, and was .70 for the total score. Based on the 6-factor model, factor loadings were among .65 ~ .92 providing convergent validity , and interfactor correlations were ranging .30 ~ .72 offering discriminant validity . Besides, cross validation was supported. Furthermore, metric invariance and scalar invariance existed across groups in the measurement equivalence tests; therefore it ensured that the scale can be compared on its constructs across multiple measurement times , including comparisons in interfactor correlations and latent means.
    Relation: 中華輔導與諮商學報, No.46, 127-154
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    127.pdf2075KbAdobe PDF436View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback