English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23848486      Online Users : 242
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/110530
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110530


    Title: 職災補償與損害賠償-以台日職業災害之雇主責任為中心
    Other Titles: Workers' Compensation and Civil Liability for Damages: A Comparative Study on the Employer's Liability for Industrial Accidents in Taiwan and Japan
    Authors: 徐婉寧
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 職業災害;職災補償;損害賠償;損益相抵;勞基法;勞保條例;慰撫金
    occupational accidents;workers' compensation;civil liability for damages;interest deducted from the amount of compensation claimed;the Labor Standards Law;Workers' Accident Insurance Law;consolation
    Date: 2015-06
    Issue Date: 2017-06-28 14:05:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國和日本的職業災害救濟制度,皆採取勞動基準法上的補償責任與勞工保險條例之雙軌制的職災補償制度,以及關於職災補償無法涵蓋的部分,允許受災勞工依民法的規定向雇主請求損害賠償之併存主義。然而,如果聚焦於職業災害發生時雇主責任的台日差異,會發現縱使兩國之職災救濟制度框架十分類似,但在實際的運作上,卻存在著許多差異。本文擬先介紹台日兩國職災救濟制度的全貌,再就職災補償制度的中心、免責事由的有無,以及勞基法上的補償責任與勞保給付間的關係,分析台日雇主的職災補償責任之差異。其次就民法上的損害賠償責任,先分析其為過失責任或無過失責任,再就損害賠償的範圍比較台日雇主責任的輕重。
    Both Taiwan and Japan adopt dual system of workers' compensation systems - the compensation liability under Labor Standards Law and the occupational accidents compensation under the Workers' Accident Insurance Law. For damages that is not covered by the workers' occupational accident compensation, workers are also allowed to seek compensation against the employer according to the Civil Code. However, a close comparison of employer liability on occupational accidents in Taiwan and Japan reveals many differencesin practical operation under similar legal framework. This paper first introduces the workers' compensation systems in two countries and then analyzes their differences from the following perspectives: (1) the principal law governing workers' compensation for occupational accidents, (2) exemption from responsibility, (3) the relationship between accident compensation and accident insurance benefits. This paper then compares the degree of employer's liability under Civil Code through analyzing negligence liability and the coverage of damages compensation.
    Relation: 中原財經法學, 34, 169-223
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    169-223.pdf1174KbAdobe PDF137View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback