政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110530
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 109952/140903 (78%)
造訪人次 : 46051737      線上人數 : 898
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/110530


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110530


    題名: 職災補償與損害賠償－以台日職業災害之雇主責任為中心
    其他題名: Workers` Compensation and Civil Liability for Damages: A Comparative Study on the Employer`s Liability for Industrial Accidents in Taiwan and Japan
    作者: 徐婉寧
    貢獻者: 法律系
    關鍵詞: 職業災害；職災補償；損害賠償；損益相抵；勞基法；勞保條例；慰撫金
    occupational accidents；workers` compensation；civil liability for damages；interest deducted from the amount of compensation claimed；the Labor Standards Law；Workers` Accident Insurance Law；consolation
    日期: 2015-06
    上傳時間: 2017-06-28 14:05:33 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 我國和日本的職業災害救濟制度，皆採取勞動基準法上的補償責任與勞工保險條例之雙軌制的職災補償制度，以及關於職災補償無法涵蓋的部分，允許受災勞工依民法的規定向雇主請求損害賠償之併存主義。然而，如果聚焦於職業災害發生時雇主責任的台日差異，會發現縱使兩國之職災救濟制度框架十分類似，但在實際的運作上，卻存在著許多差異。本文擬先介紹台日兩國職災救濟制度的全貌，再就職災補償制度的中心、免責事由的有無，以及勞基法上的補償責任與勞保給付間的關係，分析台日雇主的職災補償責任之差異。其次就民法上的損害賠償責任，先分析其為過失責任或無過失責任，再就損害賠償的範圍比較台日雇主責任的輕重。
    Both Taiwan and Japan adopt dual system of workers` compensation systems - the compensation liability under Labor Standards Law and the occupational accidents compensation under the Workers` Accident Insurance Law. For damages that is not covered by the workers` occupational accident compensation, workers are also allowed to seek compensation against the employer according to the Civil Code. However, a close comparison of employer liability on occupational accidents in Taiwan and Japan reveals many differencesin practical operation under similar legal framework. This paper first introduces the workers` compensation systems in two countries and then analyzes their differences from the following perspectives: (1) the principal law governing workers` compensation for occupational accidents, (2) exemption from responsibility, (3) the relationship between accident compensation and accident insurance benefits. This paper then compares the degree of employer`s liability under Civil Code through analyzing negligence liability and the coverage of damages compensation.
    關聯: 中原財經法學, 34, 169-223
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    169-223.pdf1174KbAdobe PDF2364檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋