English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46327750      Online Users : 1303
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/110773
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110773


    Title: 我國食品業CSR之揭露情況及投資人看法之研究
    Disclosure of CSR in food industry from Taiwan and investor`s opinion
    Authors: 謝蕎璘
    Hsieh, ChiaoLin
    Contributors: 王文英
    謝蕎璘
    Hsieh, ChiaoLin
    Keywords: CSR
    CSR揭露情況
    法人投資人
    自然人投資人
    Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
    CSR disclosure
    Institutional investor
    Non-institutional investor
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-11 11:24:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 食品業為與生活及健康攸關的產業,而從食安事件的發生及後續處理措施,可看出CSR報告書作為公司與社會之溝通橋樑的重要性日益提升。本研究主要探討我國食品業CSR之揭露情況及投資人之看法,第一階段採用內容分析法對我國上市櫃食品業共27家公司之CSR報告書揭露情況進行分析,第二階段透過訪談了解影響自然人投資人及法人投資人決策之重要指標及原因。研究結果發現(1)我國食品業CSR揭露為社會類別指標揭露數量最多,經濟類別指標揭露品質最好。(2)自然人投資人較重視與現金流量相關指標,並且更著重於影響公司目前狀況的指標;法人投資人則是較重視造成股價變動的指標,並且更著重於指標所帶來的長遠影響。(3)兩類投資人認為重要的指標的揭露情況為社會類別指標占多數,而指標揭露則是較常採用量化數字方式表達,較少採用文字敘述方式表達。公司可將本研究之結果做為未來編制CSR報告書之參考。
    Food industry is associated with our lives and health. Since food safety events happened, government takes steps to increase information transparency of the firms. As a part of firm`s communication tools in order to decrease information asymmetries between firms and society, CSR reporting becomes more important. This study aims to investigate how firms from Taiwan food industry disclose CSR and how investors think of CSR index. In the first step, content analysis is used to analyze CSR disclosure of 27 food industry. In the second step, through interviewing non-institutional investors and institutional investors, we can find how CSR index influences their decision. The result shows that (1) most of the firms disclose social indexes and the quality of economic indexes are the highest. (2) Non-institutional investors focused on company’s cash flow and put more emphasis on index that effect recent financial situation. While institutional investors focused on stock price and put more emphasis on index that effect long-term financial situation. (3) Through two kinds of investor’s opinion and firm’s CSR disclosure, we find that the disclosure of social indexes are the most common, most of the indexes disclosed by quantitative way, and fewer of them use monetary way to disclose. The firm may use the results of this study as a reference for future CSR reports.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    全球永續性報告協會,2014a,GRI G4 永續性報告指南:報告原則與標準揭露,吳文雅、莫冬立、張凱評、陳科里、張仁杰與楊于縈譯,台北:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。
    全球永續性報告協會,2014b,GRI G4 永續性報告指南:實施手冊,吳文雅、莫冬立、張凱評、陳科里、張仁杰與楊于縈譯,台北:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。
    全球永續性報告協會,2016,GRI G4 食品加工業行業揭露,吳文雅、莫冬立、張凱評、陳科里、張仁杰、巫宜株與陳譽文譯,台北:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。
    高麗萍,黃歆詒,潘冠尹與江穎,2016,企業社會責任報告書資訊內涵之研究,慈濟科技大學學報,第三期(八月):125-150。
    郭素菱,2002,機構投資人與財務報表攸關性之研究,國立成功大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    黃瓊瑤,王癸元與張鳳真,2013,企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究,當代會計,第十四卷第二期(十一月):175-204。
    蘇惟宏,2000,機構法人從眾行為之研究─以國內股市集中交易市場為例,國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    廖妙娟,2010,台灣股票市場個別投資人與機構投資人之從眾行為分析,國立東華大學會計與財務金融系未出版碩士論文。

    英文文獻
    Alshammari, M. 2015. Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The moderating role of reputation and institutional investors. International Journal of Business and Management 10(6): 15-28.
    Baraket, F. S. Q., M. V. L. Pérez, and L. R. Ariza. 2015. Corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) determinants of listed companies in Palestine (PXE) and Jordan (ASE). Review of Managerial Science 9(4):681-702.
    Barnea, A., and A. Rubin. 2010. Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97(1): 71-86.
    Bird, R., A. D. Hall, F. Momentè, and F. Raggiani. 2007. What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market? Journal of Business Ethics 76(2):189-206.
    Cho, C. H., M. Giovanna, D. M. Patten, and R. W. Roberts. 2015. CSR disclosure: The more things change…? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 28(1):14-35.
    Cormier, D., M. J. Ledoux, and M. Magnan. 2011. The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision 49(8):1276-1304.
    El Baz, J., I. Laguir, M. Marais, and R. Staglianò. 2016. Influence of national institutions on the corporate social responsibility practices of small- and medium – sized enterprises in the food-processing industry: Differences between France and Morocco. Journal of Business Ethics 134(1): 117-133.
    Flammer, C. 2013. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors. Academy of Management Journal 56(3):758-781.
    Gao, Y. 2011. CSR in an emerging country: A content analysis of CSR reports of listed companies. Baltic Journal of Management 6(2):263-291.
    Giannarakis, G., G. Konteos, and N. Sariannidis. 2014. Financial, governance and environmental determinants of corporate social responsible disclosure. Management Decision 52(10):1928-1951.
    Global Reporting Initiative. 2011. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. Global Reporting Initiative.
    Godfrey, P. C., C. B. Merrill, and J. M. Hansen. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: The empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30(4):425-445.
    Hasseldine, J., A. Salama, and T. Steven. 2005. Quantity versus quality: The impact of environmental disclosures on the reputations of UK plcs. British Accounting Review 37(2):231-248.
    Hedberg, C. J., and F. V. Malmborg. 2003. The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 10(3):153-164.
    Hou, J., and B. H. Reber. 2011. Dimensions of disclosures: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting by media companies. Public Relations Review 37(2): 166-168.
    Huang, C., and F. Kung. 2010. Drivers of environmental disclosure and stakeholder expectation: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 96(3):435-451.
    Jain, R., and L. H. Winner. 2016. CSR and sustainability reporting practices of top companies in India. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 21(1):36-55.
    Jizi, M., R. Nehme, and A. Salama. 2016. Do social responsibility disclosures show improvements on stock price? The Journal of Developing Areas 50(2):78-95.
    Kansal, M., M. Joshi, and R. S. Batra. 2014. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from India. Advances in Accounting 30(1):217-229.
    Klerk, M. D., C. D. Villiers, and C. V. Staden. 2015. The influence of corporate responsibility disclosure share prices: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Pacific Accounting Review 27(2):208-228.
    Maloni, M. J., and M. E. Brown. 2006. Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics 68(1): 35-52.
    Mirfazil, E. 2008. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) information disclosure by annual reports of public companies listed at Indonesia stock exchange (IDX). International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 1(4):275-284.
    Lipunga, A. M. 2015. Corporate social responsibility reporting through the lens of ISO 26000: A case of Malawian quoted companies. International Business Research 8(2):28-41.
    Oeynon, J., S. Martin, and R. Bampton. 2011. An examination of corporate social responsibility and financial performance: A study of the top 50 Indonesian listed corporations. Journal of Global Responsibility 2(1):100-112.
    O’Riordan, L., and J. Fairbrass. 2014. Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: A new conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics 125(1):121-145.
    Parsa, S., and R. Kouhy. 2007. Social reporting by companies listed on the alternative investment market. Journal of Business Ethics 79(3):345-360.
    Prayag, C., and P. V. Rensburg. 2006. The value of analysts’ consensus recommendations: Evidence from South African brokerage houses. Investment Analysts Journal 63:5-17.
    Reverte, C. 2009. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure rating by Spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics 88(2): 351-366.
    Richards, Z., S. L. Thomas, M. Randle, and S. Pettigrew. 2015. Corporate social responsibility programs of big food in Australia: A content analysis of industry documents. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 39(6):550-556.
    Souto, D. B. 2009. Crisis and corporate social responsibility: Threat or opportunity? International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research 2(1):36-50.
    Sutantoputra, A. W. 2009. Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms’ CSR reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 14(1):34-48.
    Tata, J., and S. Prasad. 2015. CSR communication: An impression management perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 132(4): 765-778.
    Verbeeten, F. H. M., R. Gamerschlag, and K. Möller. 2016. Are CSR disclosures relevant for investors? Empirical evidence from Germany. Management Decision 54(6):1359-1382.
    Wilburn, K., and R. Wilburn. 2013. Using global reporting initiative indicators for CSR programs. Journal of Global Responsibility 4(1):62-75.

    網站資料
    經濟部統計處:http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/home/Home.aspx
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    104353012
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104353012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    301201.pdf1309KbAdobe PDF2105View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback