English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46236311      Online Users : 990
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/110776
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110776


    Title: 審計公費與董事會成員的人格特徵: 以獨立董事的產業專長與職涯背景為例
    How do board member characteristics affect audit fee pricing? The role of independent directors’ financial expertise and career background
    Authors: 練雅淯
    Lien, Ya Yu
    Contributors: 潘健民
    練雅淯
    Lien, Ya Yu
    Keywords: 審計公費
    獨立董事
    產業專長
    職涯背景
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-11 11:24:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去有關審計公費定價模型的決定因素,多數以受查客戶所揭露的財務資訊以及內部治理制度,並考量會計師事務所屬性。然而,審計公費的決定是透過會計師與受查客戶高階管理階層的協商過程,過往文獻對於此影響要素卻少有著墨。本研究以日本企業所揭露之獨立董事資訊做為樣本,探討獨立董事的產業專長對於審計公費定價決策的影響。實證結果顯示,當企業董事會裡擁有財務相關產業專長(在銀行、企業主要往來銀行、證券公司以及保險業任職之資歷)之獨立董事時,相較於沒有聘用此類專長之獨立董事之企業,其審計公費較高;當企業相互派遣獨立董事至其他企業時,或企業獨立董事來自其關聯企業時,相較於沒有聘用此類型獨立董事之企業,其審計公費亦較高。此外,本研究亦衡量董事會成員的年齡對於審計公費之關聯性,研究結果顯示董事會成員的平均年齡對於審計公費價格之影響呈正相關。
    Reference: 黃曉雯,2012,查核放大鏡 IFRS報表看仔細!,會計研究月刊,第324期(11月):60-69。
    官月緞與郭子建,2011,客戶重要性、非審計服務與會計師任期 對審計品質之影響,當代會計,第12卷(5月):1-30。
    廖秀梅、王貞靜與戚務君,2012,一套臺灣完整的審計公費資訊告訴我們什麼?,中華會計學刊,第8期(1月):49-88。
    潘健民,2016,第14章 取締役の年齢,リスクテイキングと報告利益管理 ―コーポレート・ガバナンスの観点から― in 辻正雄(編著)「経営者による報告利益管理:理論と実証」,早稲田大学会計研究所・会計研究叢書,国元書房:253-268。
    Aggarwal, R., M. Evans, and D. Nanda. 2012. Nonprofit boards: Size, performance and managerial incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (1-2): 466-487.
    Andrews, K. 1971. The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
    Arens, A. A., R. J. Elder, and M. S. Beasley. 2014. Auditing and assurance services: an integrated approach. Edinburgh Gate, England: Pearson Education Limited.
    Bamber, L. S., J. Jiang, and I. Y. Wang. 2010. What’s my style? The influence of
    top managers on voluntary corporate financial disclosure. The Accounting Review 85 (4): 1131–1162.
    Basely, M. S. 1996. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 443-465.
    Blanchard, O. 1993. Movements in the equity premium. Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 24 (2): 75-138.
    Cadbury, A. (1992). Committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance. London: GEE.
    Carcello, J. V., D. R. Hermanson, and K. Raghunandan. 2005. Factors associated with U.S. public companies’ investment in internal auditing. Accounting Horizons 19 (2): 69-84.
    Carlson, G., and K. Karlsson. 1970. Age, cohorts, and the generation of generations. American sociological review 35 (4): 710-718.
    Chaney, P. K., D. C. Jeter, and L. Shivakumar. 2004. Self-Selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 51-72.
    Chen, J., R. Duh, A. W. Hsu, and C. Pan. 2015. Can Anglo-Saxon audit committee scheme improve earnings quality in non-Anglo-Saxon environments? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 11 (1): 61-74.
    Cheng, S. 2008. Board size and the variability of corporate performance. Journal of Financial Economics 87 (1): 157-176.
    Child, J. 1972. Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6 (1): 2-22.
    Choi, J. H., J. B. Kim, X. Liu, and D. A. Simunic. 2008. Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (1): 55-99.
    Clarkson, P., and D. Simunic. 1994. The association between audit quality, retained ownership and firm-specific risk in U.S. vs. Canadian IPO markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1-2): 207-228.
    Coles, J., N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2008. Boards: Does one size fit all? Journal of Financial Economics 87 (2): 329-356.
    Cyert, R. M., and J. G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
    Dass, N., O., Kini, V., Nanda, B., Onal, and J., Wang. 2014. Board expertise: Do directors from related industries help bridge the information gap? The Review of Financial Studies 27 (5): 1533-1592.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981a. Auditor independence, low balling and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (2): 113-127.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981b. Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199.
    DeFond, M. L., J. R. Francis, and T. J. Wong. 2000. Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 19 (1): 49-66.
    Dunn, K., and B. Mayhew. 2004. Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (1): 35-58.
    Dutton, J. E., and R. B. Duncan. 1987. The creation of momentum for change through the process of strategic issue diagnosis. Strategic Management Journal 8 (3): 279-295.
    Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26 (2): 301-325.
    Franke, V. C. 1998. Old ammo in new weapons? Comparing value-orientation of experienced and future military leaders. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 26 (2): 253–271.
    Fukukawa, H. 2011. Audit pricing and cost strategies of Japanese big 3 firms. International Journal of Auditing 15 (2): 109-126.
    Gul, F.A., C.J.P. Chen, and J.S.L. Tsui. 2003. Discretionary accounting accruals, managers incentives and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (3): 441-464.
    Hay, D. C., W. R. Knechel, and N. Wong. 2006. Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research 23 (1): 141-192.
    Hay, D. 2013. Further evidence from meta-analysis of audit research. International Journal of Auditing 17 (2): 162-176.
    Hambrick, D. C., and P. A. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9 (2): 193–206.
    Hitt, M. A., and B. B. Tyler. 1991. Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal 12 (5): 327–351.
    Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
    Houston, R.W., M. F. Peters, and J. H. Pratt. 1999. The audit risk model, business risk and audit planning decisions. The Accounting Review 74 (3): 281-298.
    Knechel, W. R. 2001. Auditing: Assurance and risk, 2nd edition. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
    Kogan, N., and M. A. Wallach. 1966. Modification of judgmental style through group interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4 (2): 165-174.
    Kotler, P., and A. R. Andreasen. (1996). Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Lai, K., F. Gul, B. Jaggi, S. Radhakrishnan. 2013. Association between opportunistic management earnings forecasts and audit fees. 36th EAA (European Accounting Association) Annual Congress. Paris, School of Accounting and Finance.
    Laux, V. 2008. Board independence and CEO turnover. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (1): 137-171.
    Low, A. 2009. Managerial risk-taking behavior and equity-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics 92 (3): 470–490.
    Jensen, M. C., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48 (3): 831-880.
    Magee, R. P., and M. C. Tseng. 1990. Audit pricing and independence. The Accounting Review 65 (2): 315-336.
    Malmendier, U., and S. Nagel. 2011. Depression babies: Do macroeconomic experiences affect risk-taking? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (1) 373-416.
    March, J. G., and H. A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.
    Neal, T. L., and R. R. Riley Jr. 2004. Auditor industry specialist research design. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23 (2): 169–177.
    O’Sullivan, N. 2000. The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review 32 (4): 397-414.
    Phan, P. H., and T. Yoshikawa. 2000. Agency theory and Japanese corporate governance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 17 (1): 1–27.
    Pong, C. M., and G. Whittington. 1994. The determinants of audit fees: Some empirical models. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 21 (8): 1071-1095.
    Reynolds, J. K., D. R. Deis, and J. R. Francis. 2004. Professional service fees and auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23 (1): 29-52.
    Schuman, H., and J. Scott. 1989. Generations and collective memories. American Sociological Review 54 (3): 359–381.
    Simunic, D. A. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-190.
    Simunic, D. A. 1984. Auditing, consulting, and auditor independence. Journal of Accounting Research 22 (2): 679-702.
    Soeters, J. L. 1997. Value orientations in military academies: A thirteen country study. Armed Forces and Society 24 (1): 7–32.
    Taylor, R. N. 1975. Age and experience as determinants of managerial information processing and decision- making performance. The Academy of Management Journal 18 (1): 74-81.
    Vroom, V. H. and B. Pahl. 1971. Relationship between age and risk taking among managers. Journal of Applied Psychology 55 (5): 399-405.
    Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman, 1981, The markets for independence and independent auditors. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. https://urresearch.rochester.edu/institutionalPublicationPublicView.action?institutionalItemId=4475&versionNumber=1
    Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman, 1982. Auditors and the determination of accounting standards. Working Paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY. https://urresearch.rochester.edu/institutionalPublicationPublicView.action?institutionalItemId=4512
    Wiersema, M. F., and K. A. Bantel. 1992. Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. The Academy of Management Journal 35 (1): 91-121.
    Wiersema, M. F., and A. Bird. 1993. Organizational demography in Japanese firms: group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover. The Academy of Management Journal 36 (5): 996-1025.
    Williamson, O. E. 1984. Corporate governance. The Yale Law Journal 93: 1197-1230.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    104353031
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104353031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    303101.pdf1115KbAdobe PDF243View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback