English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 93861/124308 (76%)
Visitors : 28942919      Online Users : 513
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/111274
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111274

    Title: Evaluating efficiencies of Chinese commercial banks in the context of stochastic multistage technologies
    Authors: Huang, Tai-Hsin;Lin, Chung-I;Chen, Kuan-Chen
    Contributors: 金融學系
    Keywords: Stochastic network model;Multistage processes;Technical efficiency;Fraction of shared inputs;Copula methods;Chinese banks
    Date: 2017-02
    Issue Date: 2017-07-20 16:54:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: This paper proposes a stochastic network model under the framework of the stochastic frontier approach, which allows firms to produce outputs through multistage processes so that we can characterize the underlying technologies and assess technical efficiency in each subsector of a firm. Our model explicitly considers the links among subsectors and overcomes the failure of network DEA that fails to estimate the fractions of shared inputs employed by subsectors, when only aggregate data are available. We compile data from the Chinese banking industry over the period 2002–2015 to exemplify our approach with the help of copula methods. Under the assumption of two production stages - i.e., deposit-gathering and loan-expansion stages - we find that banks allocate roughly 59% and 61% of labor and capital, respectively, to collect deposits in the first stage and that the average technical efficiency scores in both production stages are respectively 68% and 84%. Our study supports the previous findings that joint-stock banks are the most technically efficient, while larger commercial banks, including the big four state-owned banks, are the least technically efficient.
    Relation: Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 41, 93-110
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.12.008
    DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.12.008
    Appears in Collections:[金融學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback