English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46107449      Online Users : 1339
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111559


    Title: 國中學生知覺教師正向心理特質與學習自我效能之相關研究
    A study on the relationship between the perception of Teachers’ positive psychological traits and self-efficacy of learning for junior high students
    Authors: 劉宇軒
    Contributors: 郭添財
    劉宇軒
    Keywords: 正向心理特質
    學習自我效能
    Positive psychological traits
    Self-efficacy of learning
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-31 11:25:47 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究旨在調查臺中市國中學生知覺教師正向心理特質與學習自我效能之現況,並探討背景因素之差異以及二者間之關係。本研究採問卷調查研究法,以臺中市國中在學學生為研究對象,以「國中學生知覺教師正向心理特質與學習自我效能量表」作為研究工具,進行問卷調查研究。正式問卷共發放544份,有效問卷共計有507份,有效率為93.2%。問卷回收之後,利用SPSS套裝軟體20版,以敘述統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、積差相關以及多元迴歸等進行統計分析。研究結果歸納如下:
    一、國中學生學習自我效能的現況屬於中間偏高的程度,並以「語言說服」最高,「達成目標」最低。
    二、國中學生知覺教師正向心理特質的現況屬於中間偏高程度,並以「內在動機」最高,以「正向情緒」最低。
    三、在「性別」變項中,女性學生的學習自我效能高於男性學生。
    四、在「年級」變項中,一年級學生的學習自我效能高於二年級、三年級學生,但二年級與三年級之間並無差異。
    五、在「父母教育程度」變項中,父親教育程度為大學的學生,其學習自我效能高於父親教育程度為國中小的;母親教育程度為研究所的學生,其學習自我效能高於母親教育程度為大學及高中高職的。
    六、在「父母職業類別」變項中,不同父親職業類別與不同母親職業類別的學生之間,其學習自我效能具有顯著差異,但各類別之間的差異情形並不明顯。
    七、在「學校區域」變項中,學校區域位在「中區」和「山區」的學生,其學習自我效能程度高於學校區域位在「海區」的學生。
    八、國中學生知覺教師正向心理特質與學習自我效能之間具有正相關。
    九、教師正向心理特質對於學生學習自我效能具有預測效果,並以「內在動機」的預測力最佳。
      最後根據以上結論,提出相關建議,作為教育行政機關、學校、教師以及未來研究者之參考。
    The purpose of this study is to investigate the perception of teachers’ positive psychological traits and self-efficacy of learning for junior high school students in Taichung City, and to explore the differences between background factors and the relationship between them. In this study, the questionnaire survey method was applied to study the students in Taichung City by using the scale of “Perception of Teachers’ Positive Traits and Self-efficacy of Learning for Junior High Students” as the instrument. 544 formal questionnaires were sent off, among which 507 questionnaires were valid.The rate of the valid questionnaires is 93.2%. After the questionnaires were collected, statistical analysis was performed with descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way mulitivariate analysis of variance, simple correlation and multiple regression analysis. The results are summarized as follows:
    1.The status of students` self-efficacy is high in the middle, and the "language persuasion" is the highest and "reaching the goal" is the lowest.
    2.The status of junior high school students’ perception for teachers` positive psychological traits is high in the middle and the "intrinsic motivation" is the highest and the "positive emotions" is the lowest.
    3.In the "gender" variable, female students have higher self-efficacy than male students.
    4.In the "grade" variable, the seventh graders have higher self-efficacy than the eighth graders and the ninth graders, but no difference was found between the latter two.
    5.In the "parents’education level" variable, students whose father`s education level is at college level have higher self-efficacy than those whose father`s education level is at junior high school or elementary school. Students whose mather`s education level is at graduate school have higher self-efficacy than those whose mather`s education level is at college and senior high school or vocational school.
    6.In the "parents’careers" variable, a significant difference in learning self-efficacy was found among students with different fathers’careers and different mothers` careers, but the differences between the categories are not salient.
    7.In the "school district" variable, students who reside in the "Central District" and "Mountain District" in Taichung City have a higher level of self-efficacy than those in the "Sea District".
    8.A positive correlation was found between the teachers’psychological traits and the self-efficacy of students.
    9.Teachers` positive psychological traits have a predictive effect on students` self-efficacy of learning and predictors of "intrinsic motivation" are the best.
    Finally, according to the above conclusions, some recommendations have been made for the educational administration, schools, teachers and future researchers as a reference.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    方雅雯(2009)。高雄市國中教師正向心理與情緒管理關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    江玉卉(2005)。實施休閒教育影響國中學生自我效能感之研究。公民訓育學報,16,57-84。
    江雪齡(2008)。正向心理學-生活、工作和教學的實用。新北市:心理。
    何麗君(2004)。國中學生自我效能、集體效能與學業成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    余民寧(2005)。心理與教育統計學。臺北市:三民。
    吳佩珊(2008)。正向心理學在學生輔導之應用。教師之友,49(4),26-32。
    吳孟玲(2015)。高雄市國小教師正向心理特質與學生利社會行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東大學,屏東縣。
    吳孟錞(2004)。國小高年級學生自我效能、父母期望、教師期望與行為困擾、學業表現之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
    吳婕鳳(2011)。高雄市國小教師正向心理特質與生命價值觀關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    吳煒聲(譯)(2016)。正向心理學:人類優勢的科學與實務探索。臺北市:雙葉。 (C. R. Snyder, Jennifer Teramoto Pedrotti & Shane J. Lopez)
    吳懿芳(2010)。國小教師正向心理特質、休閒參與及工作壓力之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。
    呂淑惠(2012)。高雄市國小特教教師正向心理、生命意義感與生活滿意度之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    巫文琦(2006)。國中學生自我效能、教師期望、解釋風格與學習動機之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    李函穎(2007)。國小高年級學生家庭型態、自我效能、自我調整學習策略與課業學習成就之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    李怡瑩(2015)。國小教師正向心理特質、品格教學信念與品格教學行為關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
    李旻樺(2002)。高中學生之自我效能、成功期望、學習任務價值與課業學習動機調整策略之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    李政賢(譯)(2011)。正向心理學。臺北市:五南。(Steve R. Baumgardner, Marie K. Crothers,2009)
    李堅萍(2006)。自我效能與技能課程學習成效之相關性與差異性研究─以陶藝技能為例。國教學報,18,103-124。
    李淑雅(2002)。探討國小學童自然科學習自我效能及其對小組教學中同儕互動的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    李新民(2010)。正向心理學在學校教育的應用。高雄市:麗水。
    沈碩彬(2008)。正向心理學在教師教學上的應用。師說,203,4-8。
    周毅果(2013)。教師正向心理特質與教學效能關係之研究-以楊梅市國民小學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。萬能科技大學,桃園市。
    周曉虹(譯)(1995)。社會學習理論。苗栗縣:桂冠。(Bandura, A.)
    林于巧(2011)。國中技藝教育學程學生自我效能與生涯發展相關之研究-以中部五縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    林文乾(2006)。國中學生自我效能、父母期望、教室結構知覺與學業成就之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    林宛蓁(2009)。嘉義縣國小教師正向心理知覺、情緒智慧與生活適應關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    林清江等(1999)。輕狂歲月的防滑止跌妙方:青少年心理調適與輔導。臺北市:正中。
    林慧真(2004)。國小學生知覺教師期望與自我效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東縣。
    林蕙薌(2012)。國小教師正向心理特質與學校組織文化及學校組織創新關係之研究-以高雄市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    林寶生(2005)。組織氣候、工作特性、內外控人格、自我效能與工作績效之關係研究 : 以陸軍某基地進訓基層單位為例(未出版之碩士論文)。大葉大學,彰化縣。
    邱妙蟬(2007)。國中學生的父母期望與其學習自我效能之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。致遠管理學院,臺南市。
    邱顯坤(2014)。臺北市國民中學校長正向領導與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    邵俊德(1995)。高中音樂資優生自我效能與生涯決定之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
    洪福源(2010)。高中教師與學生團體凝聚力、集體效能與自我效能關係之研究。臺北海洋技術學院學報,3(1),97-119。
    洪蘭(譯)(2009)。真實的快樂。臺北市:遠流。(M. E. P.Seligman)
    洪蘭(譯)(2009)。學習樂觀.樂觀學習。臺北市:遠流。(M. E. P.Seligman)
    孫志麟(1991)。自我效能的基本概念及其在教育上的應用。教育研究雙月刊,22,47-53。
    孫素茜(2014)。國小教師正向心理特質與工作投入之相關研究-以新竹縣為例(未出版之碩士論文)。玄奘大學,新竹市。
    徐新逸、黃麗鈴(1999)。高中生學業成就自我效能與學業成就表現之探討:影響自我效能因素與成就表現相關研究。教育與心理研究,22,267-294。
    高申春(2001)。人性輝煌之路:班杜拉的社會學習理論。臺北市:城邦。
    張春興(1996)。現代心理學。臺北市 : 臺灣東華。
    張敏、雷開春、張巧明(2005)。中學生學習效能感的特點研究。心理科學,5,1148-1151。
    張傳琳等(2013)。正向心理學。臺北市:洪葉。
    張畹平(2015)。臺北市國小輔導教師正向心理特質、工作壓力與專業耗竭之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。臺北市立教育大學,臺北市。
    梁茂森(1998)。國中生學習自我效能量表之編製。教育學刊,14,155-192。
    許美珍(2002)。國中資源班學生數學科自我效能與課業尋助之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化。
    許華慧(2008)。求職技巧輔導方案對職業訓練脊髓損傷學員一般自我效能及求職自我效能的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    許鶯珠(2009)。正向心理學在諮商輔導的應用。諮商與輔導,281,48-52。
    郭本禹,姜飛月(2008)。自我效能理論及其應用。上海:上海教育。
    郭明德(1999)。國小教師自我效能、班級經營策略與班級經營成效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所,高雄市。
    陳世文(2002)。歸因遷移教學對原住民學童自然科自我效能與學習成就歸因之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院,花蓮縣。
    陳玉玲(1994)。目標設定、目標投入與自我效能對國小學生數學作業表現的影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    陳佳妙(2011)。國小教師工作壓力、正向心理特質與其生活滿意度之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學,嘉義縣。
    陳宜嬪(2008)。兩岸小學生語文學習自我效能感之比較-以馬祖與福州各一所小學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。銘傳大學,臺北市。
    陳怡如(2014)。高雄市國民中學教師正向心理、工作滿意度與教學效能之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    陳俞秀(2014)。高雄市國中教師正向心理特質、組織文化與教學效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    陳書凱(2004)。一次讀完15位心理學大師經典講義。臺北市:靈活文化。
    陳嘉惠(2007)。國中學生知覺教師期望、自我效能與學業成就關係之研究---以新竹縣市為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    曾文志(2006)。活出生命的價值─正向心理學的認識。師友月刊,464,1-7。
    曾文志(2006)。就算短暫也是永恆─談正向心理學的發展。師友月刊,465,57-63。
    曾淑貞(2003)。台北縣國中中輟復學生之自我效能感、被同儕接納感與再中輟傾向之相關性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。
    黃郁文(1994)。自我效能概念及其與學業成就表現之關係。諮商與輔導,106,39-41。
    黃郁婷(2011)。正向心理學主要內涵及其在心理諮商之應用。諮商與輔導,304, 6-10。
    黃雅芳(2006)。國中導師領導行為、學生自我效能與班級集體效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    葉千綺(2010)。高雄縣市國小教師正向心理特質、工作壓力與生活適應關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    詹敏娟(2002)。國小三年級數學學習困難學生與普通學生學業自我效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    詹璿芳(2006)。國小資賦優異學生與普通班學生解釋型態、自我效能與學業成就之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    廖真瑜(2005)。國中學生自我效能、目標導向、課業任務價值與學業延宕之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
    趙柏原(1999)。國中學生自我效能、求助態度與課業求助行為之相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學教育研究所,彰化縣。
    劉信雄(1992)。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能、與學業成就關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    蔡麗雯(2012)。高雄市高中教師正向心理特質、情緒勞務與工作壓力關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
    鄭曉楓、余芊瑢、朱惠瓊(譯)(2014)。正向心理學(第二版)。新北市:揚智。(Alan Carr)
    賴秀娟(2013)。桃園縣國民小學兼任行政職務的教師之正向心理特質與工作滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    謝佳綺(2014)。安置少年自立生活自我效能感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。靜宜大學,臺中市。
    謝廣全、謝佳懿(2010)。SPSS與統計應用學。臺北市:巨流。
    魏妤珊(2011)。高雄市國小級任教師轉型領導、班級經營效能與學生自我效能感關係之研究:以班級經營效能為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
    蘇彙珺(1997)。社會支持、自我效能與國中學生壓力因應歷程中認知評估及因應策略的相關研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台灣師範大學,臺北市。
    顧為瑾(2002)。台北市國中學生網路行為與學習自我效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    二、外文部分
    Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
    Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students`` learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
    Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811-831.
    Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 131-147.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
    Bandura, A. (1982).Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hal, Inc.
    Bandura, A. (1990). Perceived self-efficacy in the exercise of personal agency. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2, 128-163.
    Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
    Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75-78.
    Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass community. Media Psychology, 3, 265-299.
    Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51(2), 269-290.
    Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598.
    Berman, D., & Davis-Berman, J. (2005). Positive psychology and outdoor education. Journal of Experiential Education, 28(4), 17-24.
    Bong, M., & Hocevar, D. (2002). Measuring self-efficacy: Multi-trait multi-method comparison of scaling procedures. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 143-171.
    Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, race, and gender in middle school science. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7, 271-285.
    Chen, P. P. (2003). Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh grade mathematics students. Learning and Individual Differences,14, 79–92.
    Cohen,J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
    Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivation processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.
    Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality, Psychological review, 95, 256-273.
    Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    Joseph, S., & Linley, A.(2005). Positive psychological approaches to therapy. Counseling & Psychotherapy Research, 5(1), 5-10.
    Kauffman, C., & Silberman, J. (2009). Finding and fostering the positive in relationships: Positive interventions in couples therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 520-531.
    Keyser, V.,& Barling, J. (1981). Determinants of children’s self-efficacy beliefs in an academic environment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 5,29-40.
    Klassen, R. M. (2004). A Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Efficacy Beliefs of South Asian Immigrant and Anglo Canadian Nonimmigrant Early Adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 731-742.
    Linley , P. A., Joseph. S., Harrington, S., & Wood A. M.(2006). Positive psychology: Past, present, and(possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 3-16.
    Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Maddux, J. E. (1995).Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research, and application. New York: Plenum Press.
    Marsh, H. J., Roche, L. A. Roche, Pajares, F. and Miller, D. (1997). Item-specific efficacy judgments in mathematical problem solving: the downside of standing too close to trees in a forest. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 363-377.
    Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. NY: Harper and Row, 35-47.
    Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19,139–158.
    Pajares, F., & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124-139.
    Pajares, F., & Kranzler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426–443.
    Pajares, F., & Miller, D. M. (1995). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematical performances: The need for specificity of assessment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 190-198.
    Pajares, F., & Miller, D. M. (1997). Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematical problem-solving: Implications of using different forms of assessment. Journal of Experimental Education, 65(3), 213-228.
    Pajares, F., & Valiante, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 390-405.
    Pearson, K. R. (2003).Design and development of the self-efficacy for music studies scale. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brigham Young University, Utah.
    Pillai, R., & Williams, E.A.(2004). Transformational leadership, self-efficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment, and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(2), 144-159.
    Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 544–555.
    Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
    Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
    Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19 (2), 159-172.
    Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. L. (2006). Self-efficacy development in adolescence. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-Efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.
    Schunk, D. H., & Schwartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 337-354.
    Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness:Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: The Free Press.
    Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Positive psychotherapy, positive prevention, and positive therapy. In C.R.Snyder & Shane J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology(chap. 1, pp.3-9). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006).Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61, 774-788.
    Seligman, M. E. P., Reivich, K., Jaycox, L., & Gillham, J. (1995). The Optimistic Child. New York: Houghtom Mifflin.
    Shell, D. F., Colvin, C., & Bruning, R. H. (1995). Self-efficacy, attributions, and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement: Grade-level and achievement-level differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 386-398.
    Shunk, D. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive skill learning. In C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Goals and cognitions , 3, 13-44. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.
    Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210.
    Wigfield A., Eccles J. S., Douglas M. I., Reuman D. A., & Midgley C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 552-565.
    Wilhite, S. C. (1990). Self-efficacy, locus of control, self-assessment of memory ability, and study activities as predictors of course achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 696-700.
    Woolfolk, A. E., & Hoy, W. K.(1990). Prospective teachers’ sense of efficacy and beliefs about control. Journal of Education Psychology, 82, 81-91.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency. The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skills. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents(pp. 45-69). Greenwich, CT: Information age.
    Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Edcutaional Psychology, 82, 51-59.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    學校行政碩士在職專班
    99911021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099911021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    102101.pdf1613KbAdobe PDF267View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback