政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111710
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109951/140892 (78%)
造访人次 : 46211682      在线人数 : 953
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111710


    题名: 社會企業如何取得資源—以A公司為例
    How do social enterprises acquire resources - illustrated by the case of Company A
    作者: 蔡蕙伃
    Tsai, Hui Yu
    贡献者: 蘇威傑
    蔡蕙伃
    Tsai, Hui Yu
    关键词: 社會企業
    資源取得
    社交連結
    品質信號
    說故事
    Social enterprise
    Resources
    Social ties
    Quality signals
    Storytelling
    日期: 2017
    上传时间: 2017-08-10 09:39:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 隨著經濟的快速成長，產生了各種社會問題，而為了解決這些社會問題，許多社會企業隨之出現，這些企業希望在改善社會問題的同時，能透過盈利的方式，使組織永續經營，而本研究欲探討社會企業如何取得資源，換言之，哪些因素會影響資源擁有者提供資源的意願。
    本研究參考過去的文獻資料，整理出三項會影響社會企業獲取資源難易度的因子，分別為「社交連結」、「品質信號」與「說故事」，並透過個案研究的方式，透過深度訪談及次級資料的蒐集，探討各個因子是否對社會企業取得資源有所影響。研究結果顯示，在三項因子中，社會企業最常使用說故事的方法來獲取資源，最少透用釋放釋放品質信號，然而，若社會企業有一個很強的品質信號，便會被大量的使用。最後，社會企業若有好的故事，且主動聯絡，透過多樣化的媒體管道，也能更有效的吸引資源擁有者的注意，增加獲得資源機會。
    With the rapid development of economy, a variety of social problems have arisen. As a result, many social enterprises have emerged in order to solve these social problems. These enterprises attempt to help solve social problems and meanwhile, they want to make the enterprise sustainable by making profit. This study wants to explore how social enterprises acquire resources. In other words, this study examines the factors that will affect the willingness of resource owners to provide resources.
    Referring to past literature about how social enterprises acquire resources, this study categorizes them into three factors that may affect the accessibility of resources for social enterprises, which are “social ties”, “quality signals” and “storytelling.” This study uses the method of case study. Through in-depth interviews and secondary information, we examine how each factor may affect social enterprises acquiring resources. Results show that among the three factors, storytelling is being used the most often to obtain resources. On the other hand, quality signals are used the least often. However, if a social enterprise has a very strong quality signal, it will be widely used. Finally, if a social enterprise has a good story and takes initiative to contact media, it can attract more media attention. Through various media channels, more resource owners will have the chance to know this social enterprise; therefore, the chance of acquiring resources may increase.
    參考文獻: 期刊論文
    林文里，2015。社會企業之籌資方式。全國律師月刊，2015年9月號：53-61。
    官有垣，2007。社會企業組織在台灣地區的發展。中國非營利評論，第1卷： 146-181。
    網際網路
    flyingV，2015。醜蜜桃大翻身-拉拉山水蜜桃果汁吧。搜尋日期：2016年12月10日。網址https://www.flyingv.cc/projects/6825。
    上下游新聞市集，2014。政大國貿男與水蜜桃孩子的卡維蘭邂逅。搜尋日期：2016 年12月10日。網址https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/51672/。
    上下游新聞市集，2015。政大國貿男與水蜜桃孩子再續緣，退伍後自組公司行銷「卡維蘭」。搜尋日期：2016年12月10日。網址https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/68732/。
    中時電子報，2015。農村再行銷，水蜜桃翻轉他人生。搜尋日期：2016年12月10日。網址http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151207001241-260102。
    行政院。農業經營現況。搜尋日期：2017年6月20日。網址http://www.ey.gov.tw/state/News_Content3.aspx?n=0E57D34A3C127591&sms=FE33AFFA1C25C4DD&s=9963D58B76C1AE51。
    政大之聲，2015。政大畢業生洪毅昕創設《卡維蘭》，幫助果農包裝行銷。搜尋日期：2016年12月10日。網址http://www.vnccu.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/news/%E6%94%BF%E5%A4%A7%E7%95%A2%E6%A5%AD%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%AA%E6%AF%85%E6%98%95%E5%89%B5%E8%A8%AD%E3%80%8A%E5%8D%A1%E7%B6%AD%E8%98%AD%E3%80%8B-%E5%B9%AB%E5%8A%A9%E6%9E%9C%E8%BE%B2%E5%8C%85%E8%A3%9D%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7-11076719。
    奧丁丁開放市集。卡維蘭商家故事。搜尋日期：2016年12月10日。網址https://www.owlting.com/market/items/3540。
    數位時代，2015。新創企業。搜尋日期：2016年12月10日。網址http://www.digitimes.com.tw/tech/dt/n/shwnws.asp?id=0000434496_wfa3tmzmluk9q05u6v8bm
    聯合新聞網，2016。政大卡維蘭團隊，友善生產者的新型盤商。搜尋日期：2016 年12月10日。網址http://udn.com/news/story/8830/1697818。

    英文文獻
    Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. 2004. Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3): 260-282.
    Amit, R., Brander, J., & Zott, C. 1998. Why do venture capital firms exist? Theory and Canadian evidence. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(6), 441-466.
    Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, C. M. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 645-670.
    Battilana, J. & Lee, M. 2014. Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing – Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, Volume 8, 398-441.
    Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
    Boschee, J. & McClurg, J. 2003. Toward a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship: Some Important Distinction. Retrieved October 9, 2008.
    Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., & Hart, M. M. 2001. From initial idea to unique advantage: The entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. The Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 64-78.
    Burt, R. S. 1987. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 1287-1335.
    Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 339-365.
    Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. 1997. Corporate strategy: Resources and the scope of the firm. McGraw-Hill: Irwin.
    Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. 1995. Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Knowledge and Strategy, 25-40.
    Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. 2011. Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39-67.
    Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. 2003. The value of organizational reputation in the recruitment context: A brand‐equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(11), 2244-2266.
    Certo, S. T. 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 432-446.
    Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. 2003. Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209-240.
    Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. 2008. Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202-228.
    Defourny, J. & Nyssens, M. 2012. The EMES Approach of Social Enterprise in a Comparative Perspective. WP no. 12/03.
    Dees, G. 1994. Social enterprise: Private initiatives for the common good. Working Paper Series No. 9-395-116, Harvard Business School.
    Dees, G. 1998. The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Kauffman Foundation and Stanford University
    Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. 2000. Qualitative research. Thousand Oaks ua.
    Filatotchev, I., & Bishop, K. 2002. Board composition, share ownership, and ‘underpricing’ of UK IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 941-955.
    Given, L. M. (Ed.). 2008. The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications.
    Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112.
    Hall, J., & Hofer, C. W. 1993. Venture capitalists` decision criteria in new venture evaluation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 25-42.
    Haugh, H., & Tracey. P. 2004. The role of social enterprise in regional development. Paper presented at the Social Enterprise and Regional Development Conference, Cambridge-MIT Institute, University of Cambridge.
    Johnson, P. 1986. New firms: An economic perspective. Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.
    Kerlin, J. A. 2010. A comparative analysis of the global emergence of social enterprise. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 21(2), 162-179.
    Kraatz, M. S., & Block, E. S. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 840, 243-275.
    Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 76-104.
    Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 545-564.
    Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E., & Jennings, P. D. (2007). Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1107-1132.
    Morse, J. M. 2000. Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3-5.
    OECD. 1999. Social Enterprises. OECD.
    Ruef, M., & Patterson, K. 2009. Credit and classification: The impact of industry boundaries in nineteenth-century America. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(3), 486-520.
    Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. 1997. Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis. Manchester University Press.
    Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
    Shane, S., & Cable, D. 2002. Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48(3), 364-381.
    Spence, M. 2002. Signaling in retrospect and the informational structure of markets. The American Economic Review, 92(3), 434-459.
    Stone, M. M., & Brush, C. G. 1996. Planning in ambiguous contexts: The dilemma of meeting needs for commitment and demands for legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal, 633-652.
    Saunders, M. N. 2011. Research methods for business students, 5/e. Pearson Education India.
    Waibel, M. C., & Wicklund, R. A. 1994. Inferring competence from incompetence: An ironic process associated with person descriptors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(4), 443-452.
    Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
    Yin, R. K. 2013. Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.
    Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70-105.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    104351015
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104351015
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    101501.pdf1006KbAdobe PDF230检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈