English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23471664      Online Users : 203
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111864


    Title: 習近平主政後中美南海政策之研究
    A Study of Sino - American Policy Towards the South China Sea after Xi Jinping 's Reign
    Authors: 陳忠溪
    Chen, Chung Hsi
    Contributors: 朱新民
    陳忠溪
    Chen, Chung Hsi
    Keywords: 中共南海政策
    美國重返亞洲戰略
    南海主權
    南海九段線
    The CPC South China policy
    The United States to return to Asia strategy
    The South China Sea sovereignty
    South China Sea Jiuduan line
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-10 10:15:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2013年3月14日,習近平成為中共的最高領導人,不同於前幾代中國大陸領導人,習近平提出了「中國夢」的願景,不僅為主導與型塑著習近平時代中共的對外政策、戰略規劃與全球佈局,且其的內涵伴隨著情勢發展和現實需要不斷的擴充,不僅積極應處周邊關係,穩定亞太地區、妥善處理海權爭議、牽制美國亞太「再平衡」戰略,並向西推進「一帶一路」戰略。
    而在亞太地區被公認為世界經濟發動的火車頭之際,「重返亞洲」則成美國最重要的外交目標。歐巴馬政府重新調整外交政策,強調透過盟友、國際制度、謹慎的外交及道德理想的力量來爭取他人認同美國的目標,藉此促進本身的利益;同時,藉由增加在該地區的政治、經濟和軍事投入,逐漸提升其他國家對於美國的信任,藉此鞏固美國的領導地位。
    美中雙方為何這麼在意在南海區域的發展及權利伸張,美國在仲裁案後特別強調南海是美國「最高國家利益」,而中方也早早就說過南海是中國的「核心利益」,如此是否註定中美兩方必在南海地區發生權力爭奪戲碼,不禁令人要問美、中雙方到底誰才是破壞南海和平或南海秩序的國家?
    南海究竟具備什麼樣的地理特性或其他重要的條件,讓世界的霸權及崛起的強權交集的南海地區,而使這個地區被學者示警南海恐成第3次世界大戰舞臺。
    On March 14, 2013, Xi Jinping became the supreme leader of the Chinese Communist Party. Unlike the leaders of the previous generation of mainland China, Xi Jinping put forward the vision of "Chinese Dream", not only for the foreign policy and strategic planning And the global layout, and its connotation along with the development of the situation and the reality needs to continue to expand, not only actively should be peripheral relations, stability in the Asia-Pacific region, properly handle the sea dispute, contain the US Asia-Pacific "rebalancing" strategy, and westward " Along the way "strategy.
    In the Asia-Pacific region is recognized as the world economy launched the locomotive, the "return to Asia" has become the United States the most important diplomatic goals. The Obama administration has reoriented its foreign policy by emphasizing the goal of the United States through its allies, international regimes, prudent diplomatic and moral ideals, to promote its own interests; by increasing the political, Economic and military investment, and gradually enhance the confidence of other countries for the United States, to consolidate the US leadership.
    Why the United States and China are concerned about the development of the South China Sea region and the right to extend the United States in the arbitration case, especially stressed that the South China Sea is the United States "the highest national interest", and the Chinese side has long said that the South China Sea is China's "core interests", so destined China and the United States will be in the South China Sea area of power to compete for drama, can not help but to ask the United States, the two sides in the end who is the destruction of the South China Sea peace or the South China Sea order of the country?
    The South China Sea has what kind of geographical features or other important conditions, so that the world's hegemony and the rise of the power of the intersection of the South China Sea region, leaving the region by the students to warn the South China Sea fear of the third World War stage.
    Reference: 一、中文文獻
    (一)中文專書
    中華民國八十二年~八十三年國防報告書。臺北:國防部。民國八十三年。
    中華民國九十一年國防報告書。臺北:國防部。民國九十一年。
    王玉民,社會科學研究方法原理(臺北:洪葉文化,1994年)。
    王冠雄,南海諸島爭端與漁業共同合作(臺北:秀威資訊出版公司,民國91年11月)。
    安應民等:《南海安全戰略與強化行政管理》,中國經濟出版社2012年版。
    朱鋒,「『權力轉移』理論:霸權性現實主義?」,國際政治研究,第3期(2006年3月)。
    吳士存,南沙爭端的起源與發展(北京:中國經濟出版社,2010年)
    易君博,政治理論與研究方法,(臺北:三民書局,1984年)。
    倪世雄,「第三次論戰─新現實主義與新自由主義」,當代國際關係理論(臺北:五南圖書,2007年),頁190~191。
    陳鴻瑜,南海諸島之發現,開發與國際衝突(臺北:國立編譯館,1997年)。
    楊作洲,南海風雲:南海海域及相關問題的探討(臺北:正中書局。民國八十二年)。
    縢玉,「樹立海洋國國土意識中加強海軍建設」,載於沈一之編,理事縱橫:軍事篇(石家莊:河北人民出版社,1988),頁一三四至一三七。
    蕭曦清,南沙風雲-南沙群島問題的研判與分析(臺北:臺灣學生書局,2010年)
    《鄧小平文選》第3卷,人民出版社1993年版,第87-88頁。

    (二)中文譯作
    許綬南譯,Richard Bernstein、Ross H. Munro,《即將到來的中美衝突》(The Coming Conflict with China)(臺北:麥田出版社,1997年9月),頁4。

    (三)中文期刊
    王傳劍:《美國的南海政策》,《外交評論》2009年第6期,第96頁。
    王輯思、李侃如《中美戰略互疑:解析與應對》,北京大學國際戰略研究中心2012年3月。
    《戰略與系統的評估——南海問題》,《海陸空天慣性世界》2010年第10、11和12期。
    宋燕輝,「南海地區安全戰略情勢之發展與現況」,亞太研究論壇,第19期,2003年3月,頁12-21。
    宋燕輝:「中菲南海仲裁案:有關低潮高地、岩礁和島嶼的主張」,《中國海洋法學評論》,2015年第1期,第296頁。
    時永明:「美國的南海政策:目標與戰略」,《南洋問題研究》,2015年第1期,第5-6頁。
    時永明:「美國的南海政策:目標與戰略」,《南洋問題研究》,2015年第1期,第4頁。
    李明峻,「日本對南海衝突處理之政策研析」,國家政策雙週刊,第171期,1997年8月19日,頁10-11。
    李金明,「南海問題的最新動態與發展趨勢」,東南亞研究,第1期,2010年,頁35-48。
    李國強:《對解決南沙群島主權爭議幾個方案的解析》,《中國邊疆史地研究》2000年第3期,第84頁。
    周琪:「冷戰後美國南海政策的演變及其根源」,《世界經濟與政治》,2014年第6期,第33-34頁。
    岳德明:《中國南海政策芻議》,《戰略與管理》2002年第3期,第55頁。
    林利民:《未來十年中美關係的範式選擇與中國對美戰略》,《國際關係學院學報》2012年第2期,第1-9頁。
    紀蒨樺,「從建構主義看東南亞國協對南海問題之策略」,亞太經濟合作,第11期,頁149-157。
    高少凡、葉長城,「東亞區域和平的潛在威脅:南中國海問題之研究」,東南亞季刊,第3卷,第4期,1999年5月,頁36-60。
    郭淵《冷戰後美國的南中國海政策》,《學術探索》2008年第1期,第54-58頁;蔡鵬鴻《美國南海政策剖析》,《現代國際關係》2009年第9期,第1-8頁。
    陳重成、唐欣偉,「中國大陸崛起對當前國際體系的衝擊」,遠景基金會季刊,第6卷第4期(2005年10月),頁122。
    黃介正,〈歐巴馬亞洲行與美國亞太戰略轉型〉,《展望與探索》,第7卷,第12期(2009年),頁1。
    黃介正,「歐巴馬亞洲行與美國亞太戰略轉型」,展望與探索,第7卷第12期(2009年),頁1。
    董保存、李維坤《劉華清與西沙設防、南沙奪礁》,《黨史博覽》2012年第8期,第40頁。
    《專題討論:中國邊海問題與中國對外戰略》,《現代國際關係》2012年第8期,第7-42頁。
    劉中民、滕桂青,「十餘年來國內南海問題的歷史地理和法理研究」,河南科技大學學報(河南),2006年第24期,頁44。
    劉復國,「當前區域性南海問題對話合作機制」,亞太研究論譠,第3卷,第19期,2003年3月,頁39-44。
    蔡鵬鴻:《試析南海地區海上安全合作機制》,《現代國際關係》2006年第6期,第8-10頁。
    鄭端耀,「國際關係新古典現實主義理論」,問題與研究,第44卷第1期(2005年1月),頁115~135。
    鄭澤民:《南海問題中的大國因素——美日印俄與南海問題》,世界知識出版社2010年版,第50頁。
    《南海問題中的第三者》,《海洋世界》2008年第1期,第37頁。

    (四)學位論文
    張明亮:《美國的南中國海政策:1951——2002》,北京大學2004年博士論文。
    曾勇:《中美關係視角下的南海問題研究》,中共中央黨校2013年博士論文。
    鍾堅,南海戰略地位、經濟效益、國防間隙與主權糾紛論文集冊,民國八十三年十一月,頁一三一至一三八。

    (五)中文網路資料
    中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室:《中國的軍事戰略》(2015年中國國防白皮書),2015年5月26日,新華網,http://news.xinhuanet.com/mil/2015-05/26/c_127842934.htm。
    張文木:《深入理解鄧小平的海洋戰略》,http://www.aisixiang.com/data/47031.html.
    楊毅:《安全環境發生變化 戰略思維需開創新天地》,http://www.aisixiang.com/data/48598.html.
    熊玠,〈解讀歐巴馬走訪東亞及中國之用意與成效〉,《海峽評論》,第228期(2011年2月號),http://www.haixiainfo.com.tw/228-7749.html。
    戴秉國:《堅持走和平發展道路》,http://gb.cri.cn/27824/2010/12/07/5187s3081282.htm。
    戴秉國:《堅持走和平發展道路》,http://theory.people.com.cn/GB/13459806.html.
    龐中英《南海問題需準備非外交手段》,http://www.aisixiang.com/data/detail.php?id=42363.
    中海油60億打造「981深海艦隊」每天損耗100萬美元》,http://finance.ifeng.com/news/industry/20120912/7023284.shtml。
    「中國利劍無人機首飛可定點打擊」,香港文匯報,2013年11月23日,http://news.wenweipo.com/2013/11/23/IN1311230023.htm
    「中國要成為『海洋強國』」,Financial Times中文網,2012年11月9日,http://www.ftchinese.com/story/001047412。
    「3分鐘看懂中共南海西沙建設搶主權行動」,中央通訊社,http://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201703160352-1.aspx
    「Xi Jinping named president of China」,BBC NEWS,http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-21766622。
    「習近平會見歐洲理事會主席圖斯克和歐盟委員會主席容克」,新華網,http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2016-07/12/c_1119207979.htm。
    「專家:黃岩島已被中方實際控制 南海執法力量仍有待加強」,人民網,http://world.people.com.cn/GB/17963284.html。
    「中華人民共和國政府關於在南海的領土主權和海洋權益的聲明」,新華網,http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2016-07/12/c_1119207706.htm。
    「中國海軍一年來至少17艘軍艦入列」,南都網,2014年1月9日,http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20140109/11542230.html
    「王毅華盛頓智庫演講為中國南海行動辯護」,BBC網站,http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/china/2016/02/160225_china_us_sea_wangyi。
    「外交部中方在南海島礁部署必要的國防設施完全正常」,每日頭條,https://kknews.cc/military/2q4ykve.html。
    「白宮:捍衛南海國際利益 美中貿易須雙向」,BBC,http://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-38726340
    「我主權聲明,越南提反駁」,聯合報,民國八十四年五月十九日,版二;Reginald Chua and Mary Kwang, “Hanoi Again Calls for Formal Talks on Spratly Islands,” Straits Times, July 24, 1992, p. 20.
    「國防部新聞發言人:中國軍隊將堅定不移捍衛國家主權、安全和海洋權益」,新華社,http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2016-07/12/c_1119207743.htm。
    「國際學者認為南海仲裁案所謂裁決毫無法律意義」,新華網,http://news.xinhuanet.com/world/2016-07/18/c_1119234322.htm。
    「南海關鍵之役:中越赤瓜礁海戰」,中時電子報,http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20160714006582-260417
    「美濟礁事件」,百度百科,http://baike.baidu.com/item/%E7%BE%8E%E6%B5%8E%E7%A4%81%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6
    「美國白宮:將保護美國在南海利益」,FT中文網,http://big5.ftchinese.com/story/001071143
    「胡錦濤:習近平任軍委主席非常合適」,網易新聞,http://news.163.com/12/1118/02/8GIFLT9400014AED.html。
    「菲方大勝仲裁庭否定中方九段線權利」,香港01,https://www.hk01.com/國際/31130/-南海仲裁-即時更新-菲方大勝-仲裁庭否定中方九段線權利。
    「外交部緊急召見菲駐華使館臨時代辦就菲通過‘領海基線法案’提出嚴正抗議」,中國外交部網站,2009年2月19日,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/wjbxw_602253/t537943.shtml。
    《中國大型運輸機專題》,http://news.163.com/special/chnmilcargo2013/。
    《中國的和平發展》,中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室2011年9月。
    《中國政府總理李鵬在菲律賓發表的談話摘要》,《人民日報》1990年12月16日。
    《開挖可燃冰邁進一步》,http://gd.people.com.cn/GB/123935/130363/8163285.html.
    《日媒稱中國首次向美國明確表態:南海是中國核心利益》,http://world.huanqiu.com/roll/2010-07/901628.html。

    (六)中文報紙
    《人民日報》1991年6月8日。
    《人民日報》1992年2月26日.
    邢廣梅:《據國際法中國有權隨時收回南海被占島》,《環球時報》2011年7月1日。
    徐焰:《中菲南海爭執幾十年》,《學習時報》2012年5月21日。
    新華社東京1992年10月23日日文電。
    聯合報,民國八十三年七月二十五日,版九。
    《南海資源開發的中國博弈策略:依然保持謹慎姿態》,《中國青年報》2012年9月17日。

    (七)研討會資料
    林正義,「十年來南海島嶼聲索國實際作法」,發表於「南海政策回顧與展望研討會」」(臺北:國立政治大學國際關係研究中心與亞太安全合作理事會主辦,2003年3月2日)。
    馬總統於2014年9月1日出席「中華民國南疆史料特展」之講話。
    國家海洋局宣傳教育中心,「劉賜貴在全國海洋工作會議上的報告:攻堅克難」,2012年海洋工作取得顯著成效,2013年1月10日,

    二、英文文獻
    (一)英文專書
    Aileen S. P. Baviera. Maritime Security in Southeast Asia and the South China Sea. Paper presented to International Conference on Promoting Trust and Confidence in Southeast Asia: Cooperation and Conflict Avoidance, Manila, October 16-19 1997.
    Aaron L. Friedberg, The Weary Titan: Britian and the Experience of Relative Decline, 1895~1905(Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993), pp. 301~302.
    Allan Shephard. Maritime Tensions in the South China Sea and the Neighborhood: Some Solutions. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 17, No.2 (April-June 1994), p. 195; Conflicting Territorial Claims in the South China Sea: The Spratly Islands Dispute. September 2002, Virtual Information Center, U.S. Pacific Command, p. 54.
    Ben Dolven, et al.,“Chinese Land Reclamation in the South China Sea : Implications and Policy Options”,CRS Report,June18,2015,pp.4-19.
    Charles Kindleberger, The World in Depression: 1929~1939 (Berkeley: The University of California Press, 1973).
    Christopher D. Yung, “People's War at Sea:Chinese Naval Power in the Twenty-First Century”, 4401 Ford Avenue ‧ Alexandria, Virginia 22302-1498,Center for Naval Analyses,Mar 1996.
    Congress, Senate, “Pressler Amendments Nos. 1995-1999”, 104th Cong, 1st sess, Congressional Record(July 31, 1995), S11027.
    Congress, Senate, “Senate Resolution 97-Relative To The South China Sea”, 104th Cong, 1st sess, Congressional Record(March 30, 1995), S4932-4934.
    Corazon M. Siddayao, “Southeast Asia's Offshore Petroleum Resources and the Law of the Sea”, Southeast Asian Affairs, (1977).
    Corazon M. Siddayao,“Southeast Asia's Offshore Petroleum Resources and the Law of the Sea”, Southeast Asian Affairs, (1977).
    Donald K. Emmerson,“China Challenges Philippines in the South China Sea”,East Asia Forum,March 18,2014。
    Evan S. Medeiros, China’s International Behavior: Activism, Opportunism, and Diversification (Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2009).
    Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace(New York: Knopf, 1978).
    Jacek Kugler and Douglas Lemke eds., Parity and War Evaluations and Extensions of “The War Ledger” (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996). pp. 3~33.
    Kimie Hara,Cold War Frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: Divided Territories in the San Francisco System,Routledge,London and New York,2007,pp.146-153.
    Marwyn S. Samuels, Contests for the South China Sea (New York: Methuen, 1982).
    Randall L. Schweller, Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler Strategy of World Conquest (New York: Columbia University, 1998).
    Robert Sutter,Chin-Hao Huang,“China-Southeast Asia Relations: Senior Officials Visits; South China Sea Tensions”,China-Southeast Asia Relations,July 2010。
    Robert Gilpin, “The Theory of Hegemonic War,” in Robert I. Rotberg and Theodore K. Rabb eds., The Origin and Prevention of Major War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 15~37.
    Robert Gilpin, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton: Princeton University Press,1987), pp. 86~87.
    Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981),p.116.
    Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (NJ:Princeton University Press, 1984).
    Tammen, Ronald L., Jacek Kugler, Douglas Lemke, Allan C. Stam III, Mark Adsollahian, Carole Alsharabti, Brian Efird and A. F. K. Organski, Power Transitions: Strategy for the 21st Century (New York: Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press, 2000).
    US Department of Defense,“The Asia-Pacific Maritime Se-curity Strategy: Achieving U.S. National Security Objectives in AChanging Environment”,Washington DC,August 2015,p.1.

    (二)英文期刊
    “This is the Season”, FEER, Dec. 24, 1998, p.18.
    A. F. K. Organski, World Politics (New York: Knopf, 1958), pp. 345~346.
    A.F.K. Organiski and Jacek Kugler, The War Ledger (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980),p.175.
    Admiral Harry B. Harris,Jr.,Commander,U.S.Pacific Fleet,Remarks to ustralian Strategic Policy Institute,Canberra,Aus-tralia,March 31,2015,Quoted in Ronald O'Rurke,“Maritime Ter-ritorial and Exclusive Economic Zone ( EEZ) Disputes Involving Chi-na: Issues for Congress”,CRS Report,June 1,2015,p.62.
    Andrew T H Tan ,“The US and China in the Malay Archipelago”, Asia-Pacific Review, vol.17,No.2, 2010,pp.26-55.
    Ang Cheng Guan,“The South China Sea Dispute Re-visited ”, IDSS Working Paper Series (1999), p.1.
    Ang Cheng Guan,“The South China Sea Dispute Re-visited ”,IDSS Working Paper Series 999).
    China and The United States: From Hostility to Engagement, 1968-1998,(Micron Film), No.01828。
    Dave Finkelstein, “Is China Getting Assertive on Territorial Disputes?”, Roundtable: The South China Sea and U.S.-China-ASEAN Relations , CSIS ,October 28, 2011。
    Denny Roy,“Southeast Asia and China: Balancing or Bandwagoning?” Contemporary Southeast Asia , Vol. 27, No. 2 .2005.
    Diane K. Mauzy and Brian L. Job, “U.S. Policy in Southeast Asia: Limited Re-engagement after Years of Benign Neglect”, Asian Survey, Vol. 47, No. 4 (July/August 2007), pp.632, 628-629。
    Dustin E. Wallace,“An Analysis of Chinese MaritimeClaims in the South China Sea ”,Naval Law Review,Vol. 63,No.128,2014,pp.132-135.
    Ely Ratner, et al., “More Willing and Able: ChartingChina's International Security Activism”,Center for a New AmericanSecurity,May 2015。
    Ely Ratner,“A Summer Calendar for Advancing U.S.Policy toward the South China Sea”,Center for a New American Security,May 2014,pp.1-9。
    Eric Morris. Brunei Seeks Security in an Unstable Region. International Defense Review, Vol. 25, No. 2
    Evan Braden Montgomery,“Contested Primacy in the West-ern Pacific: China's Rise and the Future of U. S. Power Projection”,International Security,Vol.38,No.4,Spring 2014,pp.115-149.
    Fareed Zakaria, “Realism and Domestic Politics:A Review Essay,” International Security, Vol. 17, No. 1 (1992), pp. 177~198.
    Gao Zhiguo and Jia Bing Bing,“The Nine-DashLine in the South China Sea: History,Status,and Implications”,TheAmerican Journal of International Law,Vol. 107,No. 98,2013,pp.101-103
    Gideon Rose, “Neoclassical Realism and Theory of Foreign Policy,” World Politics, Vol 51, No. 1(Octobor 1988), p. 147
    Howard W. French,“The South China Sea Could Become a Dangerous Contest of Military Might ”,Foreign Policy,June 5,2015。
    Ian James Storey, “Creeping Assertiveness: China, the Philippines and the South China Sea Dispute”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 21, No. 1 (April 1999), pp.109-111。
    International Crisis Group, Stirring up the South China Sea (I), Asia Report N°223, 23 Apr 2012.
    Jian, Sanqiang, “Multinational oil companies and the Spratly dispute”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol.6, Nov, 1997.
    Kenneth Waltz, “Structural Realism after the Cold War,” International Security, Vol.25, No. 1 (Summer 2000), pp. 5~41.。
    Kurt Campell, “China’s challenge and Asia’s Rise: The case for U.S. Strategic Reengagement in the Asia-Pacific Region ”, Congressional Testimony, U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, May 15th 2008。
    Kurt Campell, “China’s challenge and Asia’s Rise: The case for U.S. Strategic Reengagement in the Asia-Pacific Region ”, Congressional Testimony, U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee, May 15th 2008.
    Lee Lai,“China, the USA and the South China Sea Conflicts”,Security Dialogue Vol. 34, No. 1, March 2003.
    Marius Gjetnes, “The Spratlys: Are they Rocks or Islands ?,” Ocean Development and International Law, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2001, pp. 191-204.
    Martin H. Katchen, “The Spratly Islands and the Law of the Sea: "Dangerous Ground" for Asian Peace”, Asian Survey, Vol. 17, No. 12 (Dec., 1977), p. 1178.
    Murray Hiebert , Greg Poling,“ASEAN and the South China Sea”, Roundtable: The South China Sea and U.S.-China-ASEAN Relations , CSIS , October 28, 2011。
    oshua P. Rowan,“The U.S.-JAPAN Security Alliance, ASEAN, And The South China Sea Dispute”,Asian Survey, Vol. 45, Issue 3, May/June 2005.
    Patrick M. Cronin,Testimony before Subcommittee on Asiaand Pacific,House Committee on Foreign Affairs,“America's SecurityRole in the South China Sea”,July 23,2015,p.6。
    Patrick M.Cronin,“US Should Help Vietnam CounterChina's Coercion ”,Asia Pacific Bulletin,No.269,June 26,2014,pp.1-2.
    Phiphat Tangsubkul , Frances Lai Fung-wai ,“The New Law of the Sea and Development in Southeast Asia”, Asian Survey, Vol. 23, No. 7 (Jul., 1983), pp.868-872.
    R. Marlay, “China, the Philippines, and the Spratly Islands”, Asian Affairs: An American Review, Vol.23, No. 4, 1997, pp.195-210.
    Ralph Cossa ,Brad Glosserman,“Return to Asia: It’s Not (All) About China”,Pac Net No.7, Jan 30, 2012. ( Pacific Forum CSIS).
    Randall Schweller, “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing,”International Security, Vol. 29, No. 2 (2004), pp. 168~181.
    Ronald O'Rourke,“Maritime Territorial and Exclusive Eco-nomic Zone ( EEZ) Disputes Involving China: Issues for Congress”,CRS Report,June 1,2015。
    RP Ready to Build in Spratlys. Manila Times, June 24 1999.
    Sam La Grone,“U.S.7th Fleet Would Support ASEAN South ChinaSea Patrols”,USNI News,March 20,2015。
    Suzanne Nossel, “Smart Power,” Foreign Affairs, Vol.83, No.2 (2004), pp.131-142.
    The Third Workshop on Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea, Yogyakarta, June 28-July 21992, p. 21
    Toshi Yoshihara,James R. Holmes,“Can China Defend a “Core Interest” in the South China Sea?”, The Washington Quarterly, Vol.34, No.2, Spring 2011.
    Zulkifli Talib, “Accord on the Spratlys,” The Star, January 22, 1992, p. 1.

    (三)網路資料
    Ames Hookway,“Tribunal Rules It can Arbitrate South ChinaSea Dispute”,The Wall Street Journal,Oct. 30,2015,http: / / www.wsj.com / articles / u-n-court-rules-it-can-arbitrate-south-china-sea-dis-pute-1446175002 .
    Barack Obama,“Remarks by President Obama and PresidentBenigno Aquino III of the Philippines in Joint Press Conference ”,April 28,2014,Manila,Philippines,https: / / www. whitehouse.gov /the-press-office /2014 /04 /28 / emarks-president-obama-and-president-benigno-aquino-iii-philippines-joi.
    Brunei. From http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/brunei.html.
    Christopher C. Joyner,“The Spratly Islands Dispute in the South China Sea: Problems, Policies, and Prospects for Diplomatic Accommodation”, www.southchinasea.org/.../Joyner,%20Spratly%20Islands%。
    Daniel R. Russel,Assistant Secretary,Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs ,Testimony before the House Foreign Affairs Com-mittee Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific,Washington,DC ,April23,2015,http: / / www.state.gov / p / eap / rls / rm /2015 /04 /241017.htm.
    Daniel R. Russel,Assistant Secretary,Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs,“Rmarks at the Fifth Annual South China SeaConference ”,The Center for Strategic and nternational Studies,Washington DC,July 21,2015,http: / / www.state.gov / p / eap / ls /rm /2015 /07 /245142.htm.
    Daniel R. Russel,Assistant Secretary,Bureau of East Asianand Pacific Affairs,Testimony efore the Senate Foreign RelationsCommittee,“Maritime Issues in East Asia ”,Washington C,May13,2015,http: / / www.state.gov / p / eap / rls / rm /2015 /05 /242262.htm.
    Hillary Rodham Clinton, “Press Availability”, July23,2010, National Convention Center Hanoi, Vietnam, http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/07/145095.htm。
    Hillary R.Clinton,“Remarks at National Convention Cen-ter”,Hanoi,Vietnam,July 23,2010,http: / / www. State. gov / secre-tary /20092013clinton / rm /2010 /07 /145095. htm.
    http://www.crisisgroup.org/en/regions/asia/north-east-asia/china/223-stirring-up-the-south-china-sea-i.aspx
    http://www.gov.cn/xwfb/2012-07/26/content_2192589.htm
    James Holmes and Toshi Yoshihara, “A Chinese Turn to Mahan?,”China Brief, Vol.9, No.13 (June 24, 2009).http://news.takungpao.com.hk/military/view/2013-10/1994657.html
    John F. Copper,“Why We Need Taiwan,”National Interest, August 29, 2011,http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/why-we-need-taiwan-5815.
    John Kerry,“Remarks at Intervention at the East Asia Sum-mit”,Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia,August 6,2015,http: / / wwwstate.gov / secretary / remarks /2015 /08 245758.htm。
    John Kerry,“Remarks with Philippine Foreign Secretary Al-bert del Rosario”,December 17,2013,http: / / www.state.gov / secre-tary / remarks /2013 /12 /218835.htm。
    Michael Fuchs,“Remarks at Fourth Annual South China SeaConference”,Center for Strategic and International Studies,Washing-ton DC,July 11,2014,http: / / www.state.gov / p / eap / rls / rm /2014 /07 /229129。
    People's Republic of China,Letter to the U. N. SecretaryGeneral,Doc. CML /17 /2009,7 May,2009,http: / / www.un.org /Depts / los / clcs _ new / submissions _ files / mysvnm33 _ 09 / chn _ 2009re _mys_vnm_e.pdf.
    Peter Lewis Young. The Potential for Conflict in the South China Sea. Asian Defence Journal, November 1995, p. 26; Malaysia. From http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/malaysia.html。
    Prashanth Parameshwaran,“US Launches New Maritime Se-curity Initiatives at Shangri-La Dialogue 2015 ”,The Diplomat,June2, 2015, http: / / thediplomat.com /2015 /06 / us-launches-new-mari-time-security-initiative-at-shangri-la-dialogue-2015 / .
    Ralf Emmers,“The Changing Power Distribution in the South China Sea: Implications for Conflict Management and Avoidance”, http://www.policypointers.org/Page/View/10078.
    Robert D. Kaplan,“The Geography of Chinese Power: How Far Can Beijing Reach on Land and at Sea?,”Foreign Affairs, May/June 2010,http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~kmcm/Articles/The%20Geography%20of%20Chinese%20Power.pdf.
    Tran Truong Thuy,“Recent Developments in the South China Sea: Implications for Regional Security and Cooperation”, http://csis.org/publication/recent-developments-south-china-sea-implications-regional-security-and-cooperation。

    (四)英文報刊
    Aileen San Pablo-Baviera. (Ed.). 1992. The South China Sea Disputes: Philippine Perspectives. Manila: Philippine-China Development Resource Center and the Philippine Association for Chinese Studies, 1992, part VI
    Abby Tan. 1995. Manila Uses Tourism Veil to Reinforce Claim on Islands. New Straits Times July:15.
    Manila Welcome Other Joining Spratlys Ventures. Straits Times, September 11 1995 p. 19
    RP Welcomes Joint Ventures in Spratlys. Philippine Star, September 11 1995. p. 1.
    “Plans for Air Bases on Spratlys a Cause for Concern: Hanoi,” Straits Times, July 16, 1993, p. 7.
    Edward Wong, “Chinese Military Seeks to Extend Its Naval Power,” New York Times, April 23, 2010。
    KL Deceived Us in Pawikan Shoal—RP. Manila Times, June 25 1999; Manila, KL Told: China Owns Shoals. Philippine Daily Inquirer, June 30 1999。
    KL Developing Resort in Spratly Islands. Straits Times, May 4 1991, p. 2.
    Manila Blasts PRC Markers in Spratlys. China News, June 16, 1995, p. 1
    Ramos Calls on Spratly Claimants to Pull Troops Out. Straits Times, March 30 1994, p. 12.
    Sam La Grone,“U.S.Destroyer Made an‘Innocent Passage'Near Chinese South China Sea Artificial Island in Recent Mission ”,USNI News,Nov.2,2015。
    Too Much Made of Problem with Spratlys-Mahathir. Straits Times, August 22 1993, p. 17.
    U.S. Energy Information Administration, South China Sea: Oil & Natural Gas (March 2008); and Robert D. Kaplan, “China’s Caribbean”, The Washington Post, September 26, 2010.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班
    104981004
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104981004
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國家安全與大陸研究碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100401.pdf2208KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback