政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/113495
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109948/140897 (78%)
造访人次 : 46111660      在线人数 : 1117
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/113495


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113495


    题名: 主管職務圖利罪之罪質與犯罪結構的分析反省
    A Legal Dogmatic Study on Paragraph Structure of Abuse of Public Power for Private Profit
    作者: 許恒達
    Hsu, Heng-Da
    贡献者: 法律系
    关键词: 圖利;公務員;賄賂;濫權;對向犯;獲得利益;misuse of public power for private profit;public officer;bribery;public malfeasance;correspondence offense;profit-gaining
    misuse of public power for private profit;public officer;bribery;public malfeasance;correspondence offense;profit-gaining
    日期: 2014-09
    上传时间: 2017-10-11 11:56:11 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文討論貪污治罪條例第6條第4款公務員主管職務圖利罪（基本要件同於刑法第131條，以下簡稱圖利罪）的解釋問題，包括其法益內涵、侵害方式、構成要件的定性，以及獲得利益結果的各項解釋，討論中將尤其著重在最高法院對本罪提出的三項見解「圖利罪屬各類貪污罪名概括規定」、「獲得淨利為本罪結果」、「圖利罪屬對向犯」，筆者將透過法益概念與犯罪結構的實質解釋，主張：一、圖利罪非各類貪污罪名的概括規定，而屬刑法瀆職型犯罪的一種，其成罪結構不同於賄賂罪，並應在其客觀要件納入「致生財產損害」的實質要素。二、圖利罪的得利結果不必獲得淨利，只要有利得即足。三、圖利罪非對向犯，獲利一方亦可成立共同犯罪。
    This article aims to research on the explanation of Profit by public official in Anti-Corruption Statute (Article 6-4), including the explanation its legal interest, the way to invasion, the constitutive requirements, and profit gaining. The research will focus on three opinion raised by Supreme Court: ＂profit by public official is a general provision of corruption crimes＂, ＂the outcome of the crime is net profit＂, and ＂profit by the public official is a kind of correspondence offense＂. This article claims that: 1. Profit by public officer is not a general provision of corruption crimes but a crime belongs to malfeasance. 2. Not only profit-gaining but also property-damaging constitute the punishment grounds of this crime. 3. Profit by public official is not a correspondence offense. The man who gains earnings constitutes complicity.
    關聯: 台大法學論叢, Vol.43, No.3, pp.719-769
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199%2fNTULJ.2014.43.03.04
    DOI: 10.6199/NTULJ.2014.43.03.04
    显示于类别:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    719769.pdf957KbAdobe PDF2285检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈