English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90058/119991 (75%)
Visitors : 24078729      Online Users : 116
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/113512
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113512


    Title: 「實體真實發現主義」之知識形構與概念考古—以中世紀至現代初期之德國刑事程序發展史為中心
    "Material Fact-Finding": Its Knowledge Construction and Concept Archaeology: A Study on the History of Criminal Procedure in Germany from the Middle Ages to the Early Modern Period
    Authors: 許恒達
    Hsu, Heng-Da
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 刑事程序;實體真實發現主義;對應理論;對抗關係;糾問訴訟;控訴程序
    Criminal Procedure;Material Fact-finding;Correspondence Theory;Adversary Model;Inquisitorial Procedure;Accusatorial Procedure
    Date: 2008-02
    Issue Date: 2017-10-11 15:48:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文省察德國刑事程序法理論中最重要的訴訟目的-實體真實發現主義,先闡述其理論基礎「對應理論」;相對一般之見解,筆者從知識社會學、尼采與傅柯之見解演繹出「對抗關係」,以此重新詮釋實體真實發現主義,並透過三個不同歷史斷代的概念考掘,指出實體真實發現主義的茁生,是一種「對應理論」取代「對抗關係」的歷史進程,但對抗關係仍深埋在今日刑事訴訟的深層結構中。現代訴訟貫徹實體真實發現主義的他種解讀,即是其一方面強化了刑罰的國權公共機能,他方面透過無痛的手段壓抑了個人對國權的反抗可能性。
    This article discusses the principle "material fact-finding", the most important criminal method of proceeding among Germany's criminal procedure theories. The principle "material fact-finding" is traditionally based on correspondence theory, but the author tries to develop an adversary model derived from the "sociology of knowledge", the views of Friedrich Nietzsche and Michel Foucault, then proceed to analyze three historical periods of Germany's criminal procedure. The author argues that the birth of "material fact-finding" in Germany's criminal procedure is a developmental history in that the adversary model was gradually replaced by the correspondence conception. However, the adversary model never actually disappeared. It was rather concealed in the deeper power structure of Germany's contemporary criminal procedure and brought about the consequences of strengthening state power as well as reducing the possibilities of individual resistance.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, No.101, pp.137-192
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    3075.pdf784KbAdobe PDF112View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback