English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 85749/114396 (75%)
Visitors : 22900211      Online Users : 127
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113635


    Title: 政黨政治與選區重劃:臺灣經驗(2005-2007年)
    Partisan Politics and Redistricting in Taiwan, 2005-2007
    Authors: 鮑彤
    Batto, Nathan F.
    Keywords: 選區重劃;選區劃分委員會;分立政府;選舉委員會;選舉制度改革
    redistricting;boundary commission;divided government;election commission;electoral system reform
    Date: 2016-05
    Issue Date: 2017-10-16 17:05:54 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文檢視臺灣在2005-2007年選區重劃過程中的政黨政治,分析國民黨、民進黨兩大黨為何無法在各縣市通過對他們最有利的重劃版本。理論上,選區重劃案的政黨色彩,某種程度取決於法令規定對決策者、決策機構的黨派組成及行動順序的限制。以本研究個案來說,選區重劃案必須經過四個階段:首先為縣市選舉委員會,其次是中選會,第三為立法院,最後是立法院長與行政院長的協商。本文於每階段一一考量有關法令約制、決策機關組成和行動順序的細節內涵與效果。此外,本文檢視彰化縣、臺中縣與屏東縣例子,以說明共識型、地方選委會優勢型、政黨衝突型等三種選區重劃常見的型態。就公共行政而言,本文的分析架構提供一種評估不同改革案的方式。就政治發展的角度來說,此分析架構推論,未來選區重劃時本文指出的關鍵因素若有所改變,尤其若臺灣出現一致政府而非分立政府,則其過程與結果或許將相當不同於2005-2007年的案例。
    This paper examines partisan politics in the redistricting process in Taiwan in 2005-2007 to explain why neither major party was able to obtain its best plan in every city or county. Theoretically, the degree of partisanship depends on the extent to which guidelines constrain decision makers, the partisan composition of decision making bodies, and the sequence of action. In this specific case, there were four stages. Redistricting plans went through local election commissions, the Central Election Commission, the legislature, and negotiations between the speaker and the premier. At each stage, the effects of the guidelines, composition, and sequence are considered in detail. In addition, three counties are examined, illustrating the three common patterns: consensus, dominance by the local election commission, and partisan conflict. From a public policy standpoint, the framework presented in this paper provides a way to assess how various reform proposals would alter the incentive and constraints facing various actors. Politically, the framework suggests how future redistricting may differ from the 2005-2007 round, especially if Taiwan has unified government.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 23(1) , 1-37
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2016.23.01.01-37
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2016.23.01.01-37
    Appears in Collections:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    23(1)(001-037).pdf2192KbAdobe PDF93View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback