English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88837/118541 (75%)
Visitors : 23546483      Online Users : 506
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113652


    Title: 政治知識的測量
    The Measurement of Political Knowledge
    Authors: 黃秀端
    徐永明
    林瓊珠
    Hawang, Shiow-Duan
    Hsu, Yuan-Ming
    Lin, Chiung-Chu
    Keywords: 政治知識;開放式問卷;封閉式問卷;實驗設計
    political knowledge;open-ended question;closed-ended question;experimental design
    Date: 2014-05
    Issue Date: 2017-10-16 17:10:07 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文主要針對政治知識的測量方式及其測量結果進行分析討論,比較不同題型的測量方式是否影響受訪者答題時的行為,進而影響到該概念測量的信度與效度。本文分析的資料來源包括台灣選舉與民主化調查小組針對2012年總統與立委選舉進行的面訪調查資料(TEDS2012),以及作者以實驗設計方式針對東吳大學學生為實驗對象所獲致的資料進行分析。本文根據TEDS2012的資料分析,初步發現開放題設計的政治知識對選舉參與的影響力,比選擇題設計題型來得佳,再根據實驗設計所獲致的資料進一步分析,發現選擇題型提供受訪者「猜猜看」的機會,不僅提高回答率,也的確增加受訪者政治知識的分數,是以不同方式的測量,確實影響政治知識測量的效度與信度問題,更會影響政治知識在解釋其他政治行為與認知能力的解釋力。然而,受訪者政治知識增長的原因,是內在的知識推動,還是外在的猜題空間增加,則有待未來適合的資料做進一步探討。
    This paper aims to examine the measurement of political knowledge and its consequences via different formats of question designs. Would using different formats of questions, elicit different response behaviours from the respondents? We argue that different types of questions affect the reliability and validity of the concept. The data used in this paper was collected by the Taiwan's Election and Democratization Study (TEDS) which was designed to study electoral behaviour in the 2012 presidential and legislative election. Another data was collected by an experimental design survey carried out on students of Soochow University. Based on the preliminary analysis from the TEDS data, open-ended formats of political knowledge exert more influence in explaining electoral participation than closed-ended. The results from the experimental design survey further shows that closed-ended questions provide the respondents with opportunity to "guess" the answers, thus respondents turn out to have a higher score of political knowledge. This shows that different formats of questions truly affect the validity and reliability of the concept of political knowledge. This issue also plays a role in showing how political knowledge serves as an independent variable in explaining political attitudes and behaviour. Whether a higher score is due to the respondents' "true" knowledge or the chance to guess, however, needs further data to explore in the near future.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 21(1) , 89-126
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2014.21.01.89-126
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2014.21.01.89-126
    Appears in Collections:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    21(1)(089-126).pdf2007KbAdobe PDF97View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback