English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46091917      Online Users : 1332
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113657


    Title: 台灣原住民立法委員代表行為之研究:2002-2012之質詢內容分析
    Representative Behavior of Indigenous Legislator in Taiwan: A Content Analysis of the Floor Questions between 2002 and 2012
    Authors: 包正豪
    Pao, Cheng-Hao
    Keywords: 原住民;描述性代表;實質性代表;代表行為
    indigenous people;descriptive representation;substantive representation;representative behavior
    Date: 2013-11
    Issue Date: 2017-10-16 17:11:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以2002到2012年原住民籍立委的質詢發言內容為分析資料,來分析其問政內容是否代表其所認知選民的利益,從而驗證規範性之描述性代表理論的主張是否成立。同時也嘗試透過對質詢議題次數與內容取向的變遷分析,尋找影響變遷的可能原因。研究結果顯示,「族群代表性不足會影響沒有國會代表之原住民族的權益」的情形,並未發生。現行制度雖無法徹底保障原住民族的「描述性代表」,卻有「實質性代表」的現實。所選出的原住民代表並無狹隘的族群意識,而以「泛原住民代表」自居,在質詢問政行為上呈現關照全體原住民利益的趨勢。同時,本文也發現,原住民立委所關注的議題取向會受到選區與政黨的影響,而有所不同,但原則上都與「被代表者」(原住民)的利益相關,而也具體回應了被代表者需求。
    This study offers a novel empirical account of the representative behavior of the indigenous legislators in the 2002 to 2012 Legislative Yuan. Based on behavioral data, the analysis seeks first to know whether the lack of descriptive representation leads to the harm of substantive representation or not, and then second to illustrate the change and continuity of the issues which indigenous legislators pay attention to. The research findings indicates that although dedicated indigenous seats are always occupied by Amis, Atayal, and Paiwan, the interests of other indigenous peoples do not be harmed. In other words, the current electoral system does not guarantee descriptive representation of all indigenous peoples but provide a substantive representation to them. Basically, the elected indigenous legislators regard themselves as representatives of all indigenous peoples. Furthermore, although the issues concerned by indigenous legislators may be influenced by constituency and party affiliation, they are still highly related to indigenous interests. Indigenous legislators in Taiwan do response to the needs of the represented.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 20(2) , 103-136
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2013.20.02.103-136
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2013.20.02.103-136
    Appears in Collections:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    20(2)(103-136).pdf1828KbAdobe PDF2287View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback