English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23397870      Online Users : 78
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113662


    Title: 單記非讓渡投票選舉制度下的個人與政黨取向:一個混合洛基模型
    Partisan and Personal Voting in SNTV: A Mixed Logit Model
    Authors: 鮑彤
    Batto, Nathan F.
    Keywords: 單記非讓渡投票選制;混合洛基模型;投票抉擇
    Single non-transferable vote (SNTV);mixed logit;vote choice
    Date: 2013-05
    Issue Date: 2017-10-16 17:12:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去選舉制度的研究相信,在複數選區單記非讓渡投票選制(SNTV)的選舉,政黨與個人因素對選民的投票抉擇「應該」相當重要。然而,現有選舉行為的文獻並未就此一信念予以嚴格檢驗。本文證據顯示,雖然這兩類因素都有顯著影響,「政黨」因素遠比「個人」因素更強而有力。概括來看,在選民的投票抉擇當中,政黨因素最為關鍵;在同黨候選人之間,個人因素可用以決勝負。再者,政黨因素與個人因素也有交互作用。不同的政黨脈絡下,選民對個人因素重要與否的判斷有所不同,表面上看似屬於候選人的個人投票,其實政黨因素的考量可能影響很大。研究方法上,本文提出混合洛基模型(mixed logit),作為SNTV投票抉擇模型的適當統計工具,所檢驗的民調資料係針對1992年至2004年台灣五次立委選舉的調查。
    There are reasons to believe that both partisan and personal factors should be important in the voting decision in SNTV elections, but this has not been rigorously tested in previous literature. This paper presents evidence that both types of factors have significant impacts, but partisan factors are much more powerful than personal factors. In general, partisan factors dominate the candidate vote choice, and personal factors serve primarily as tiebreakers among candidates from the same party. Moreover, the importance that voters place on personal factors varies in different partisan contexts, and there is generally a partisan logic to these varying weights.Methodologically, this paper proposes mixed logit as an appropriate tool for modeling voting choices in SNTV and examines data from the five legislative elections in Taiwan from 1992 to 2004.
    Relation: 選舉研究 , 20(1) , 121-153
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6612%2ftjes.2013.20.01.121-153
    DOI: 10.6612/tjes.2013.20.01.121-153
    Appears in Collections:[選舉研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    20(1)(121-153).pdf1853KbAdobe PDF113View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback