English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 94524/125052 (76%)
Visitors : 29719868      Online Users : 168
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113940


    Title: 多元智能分組合作網路問題解決 學習模式成效之探究-以數學領域合作學習為例
    Authors: 王曉璿
    李瑋仁
    曹萬春
    Keywords: 多元智能;合作學習;問題解決;網路合作學習
    multiple intelligence;cooperative learning;problem solving
    Date: 2005
    Issue Date: 2017-10-23 10:31:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的在探究不同多元智能分組以進行網路合作數學問題解決之效益,主要以多元智能進行學生分組,在研究者自行設計的課程網站中,採合作學習模式進行網路數學問題解決,以了解不同學習成就與不同多元智能分組狀況之學習成效。實驗組以學生的多元智能表現分組,控制組以學業成就進行分組,探討在此學習模式下,不同分組條件的學生在數學成就評量測驗以及合作學習歷程的差異情形,並進一步探討實驗組三類不同智能(個人、數理及其他智能)學生在合作學習歷程的表現情形。研究對象為國小六年級學童,實驗組有36人,控制組有34人,共計70人。採準實驗研究法,以t檢定等統計方法分析蒐集的資料,結果如下:1. 實驗組與控制組學生在「數學評量測驗」成績沒有顯著差異。2. 以多元智能分組的實驗組在分組作業中的「豐富性」及「創造性」顯著優於控制組。3. 實驗組學生在合作學習歷程評量的得分顯著優於控制組。
    The main purpose of this study is to explore the benefit of dividing into groups with different multiple intelligence to proceed using cooperative learning through internet on problem solving of mathematics. Three groups were divided based on student personal intelligence, and then using cooperative learning model to proceed problem solving of mathematics through internet on a curriculum website. The students of experiment group were divided into groups by their multiple intelligence performance, and the students of control group were divided into groups with their learning achievement. The subjects of this study were seventy sixth-grades students; there were thirty-six in experiment group and thirty-four in control group. The Quasi-experimental design was used at the study. Several conclusions were presented as follows:1. The experiment group and the control group students made no remarkable difference on “Test of Math Achievement” grades.2. About the “abundance” and “creativity” of their grouping homework, the experiment group that divided into groups with multiple intelligence is obviously better than the control group.3. About the grades on the process of cooperative learning, the experiment group students are obviously better than the control group students.
    Relation: TANET 2005 台灣網際網路研討會論文集
    中小學網路教學
    Data Type: conference
    Appears in Collections:[TANET 台灣網際網路研討會] 會議論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    421.pdf227KbAdobe PDF83View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback