English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 93218/123590 (75%)
Visitors : 27666749      Online Users : 221
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114442


    Title: 網路之刑事追訴——科技與法律的較勁
    網路之刑事追訴——科技與法律的較勁
    Authors: 王士帆
    Wang, Shih-Fan
    Keywords: 基本權;網路犯罪偵查;網路電話;雲端搜索;秘密線上搜索
    Basic Right;Investigation in Internet;Internet Phone;Cloud Search;Hidden Online Search (verdeckte Online- Durchsuchung)
    Date: 2016-06
    Issue Date: 2017-11-07 14:53:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 於今日數位資訊社會,對抗網路犯罪成為刑法與相關刑事訴訟法的重大議題。資訊科技為法律帶來多方面挑戰。當網路成為犯罪工具,國家何嘗不想利用網路追訴犯罪。網路之刑事追訴正是科技與法律的一種較勁。科技固然一日千里,但網路偵查措施不管多精密,終究應回歸基本權干預的審查體系。對於電腦科技犯罪之蒐證,無論是雲端搜索、秘密線上搜索,審查其干預法律依據將是重心所在。因此,探求現行法是否有適當的干預授權基礎,成為網路追訴的首要課題。
    Information Technology has brought many challenges to the law. The fight against cybercrime in the substantive criminal law and the corresponding rules of criminal procedure are significant issues in today's digital information society. The Internet has become a tool for criminals. Then why are countries worldwide still hesitant in using the Internet to track and prosecute crimes? The investigation in internet serves as a type of confrontation between technology and law. Although technology advances at dizzying speeds, online detection measures-no matter how carefully designed-should be based on a scrutiny system underpinned by basic rights. The collection of evidence for cybercrimes-regardless of cloud searches or hidden online searches- must be based around a review of laws violated. As a result, whether existing laws have a proper and legal basis for intervention has become the most important issue in prosecuting online criminals.
    Relation: 政大法學評論, 145, 339-390
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202016060145006
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202016060145006
    Appears in Collections:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    145-6.pdf2014KbAdobe PDF259View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback