English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 80610/109881 (73%)
造訪人次 : 20808655      線上人數 : 359
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114447


    題名: 論過失相抵原則於受僱醫師過勞職災民訴之適用──評臺灣高等法院臺南分院一○二年度重勞上字第一號民事判決
    Offsets Against Emplyed Overworked Doctors' Negligence in a Damage Suit for an Occupational Accident: Comments on the (102) Jhong-Lao-Shang No.1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan High Court Tainan Branch Court
    作者: 徐婉寧
    Hsu, Wan-Ning
    關鍵詞: 與有過失;民法第二一七條;職業災害;職災勞工保護法;民事損害賠償
    Offsets Against Victims' Negligence;Civil Code § 217;The Act for Protecting Worker of Occupational Accidents;Civil Liability for Damages
    日期: 2016-09
    上傳時間: 2017-11-07 14:55:06 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 臺灣高等法院臺南分院一○二年度重勞上字第一號民事判決,是我國第一件過勞醫師請求醫院民事損害賠償勝訴的判決,具有指標性的意義。其跳脫醫師不適用勞基法之框架限制,承認醫師和醫院間為勞動關係,並有職災勞工保護法的適用,肯認醫院造成醫師的過勞,而應負損害賠償責任。然而,於損害額之判定時,卻認定醫師未為體檢等,於健康管理有過失,應就損害之發生負高達65%之責任。與有過失,為我國民法第二一七條所明定,然而,其於職災民訴之適用之際,是否應為限制或修正,我國實務和學說卻鮮少深入地進行探討。本文藉著評釋上開判決,除就判決本身提出相關疑問外,並透過日本法之探討,希望得以釐清與有過失法理與勞工或雇主之健康管理義務間之關係。
    The (102) Jhong-Lao-Shang No.1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan High Court Tainan Branch Court is the first judicial decision which held that it is the hospital's responsibility for damages under the Civil Code. It defined the employed doctors as labors and held that the Act for Protecting Worker of Occupational Accidents shall be applicable despite the fact the Labor Standards Act is not applicable. However, an offset based on the employed doctor's negligence was recognized, and the subject shall be responsible for 65% of the damages due to the improper performance of the duty to care for health. According to Civil Code § 217, Offsets against victims' negligence is recognized in determining the final amount of damages, but whether it shall be limited or modified in a damage suit for an occupational accident is seldom discussed in Taiwan. This thesis not only gives comments on the (102) Jhong-Lao- Shang No.1 Decision Rendered by the Taiwan High Court Tainan Branch Court, but also discusses the issues aforementioned and does the comparative study on Japan.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 146, 259-304
    資料類型: article
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202016090146005
    顯示於類別:[法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    146-5.pdf1979KbAdobe PDF81檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋