English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109927/140876 (78%)
Visitors : 45969125      Online Users : 564
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/114712


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114712


    Title: 研發支出資本化之會計基礎股票評價
    Accounting Based Valuation Model of Capitalization for R&D
    Authors: 劉正田
    Liu, Jen-Ten
    Keywords: 研究發展;資本化;Feltham and Ohlson評價模式
    R&D (research and development);Capitalization;Feltham and Ohlson valuation model
    Date: 2001-07
    Issue Date: 2017-11-15 14:53:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探討企業研發支出資本化之會計理論，首先以國內股票上市公司為實證對象，驗證企業盈餘是否受過去研發投資而產生效益，並依據Feltham and Ohlson(1995)及Bernard(1995)之會計基礎評價模式，比較研發支出資本化與費用化之評價模式特性。本文實證發現如下：(1)上市公司研發支出效益約落後一年，於未來二至五年實現。(2)依據Feltham and Ohlson評價模式，發現研發強度較高之樣本(研發強度達3%以上樣本)，採資本化較採費用化模式之帳面價值係數較小，超常盈餘持續性係數較大，評價模式之解釋能力較高。研發強度較低之樣本(研發強度未達3%樣本)，上述特性則不顯著。
    This study investigates the theory of capitalization for R&D expenditures by examining whether the earnings of listed corporations in Taiwan reflect benefits due to the past R&D investments. Based on the valuation model of Fetham and Ohlson (1995) and Bernard (1995), effects of capitalizing and expensing R&D expenditures are compared. The major findings of this study are as follows: (1) The benefits due to R&D of the listed corporations are realized in two to five years and there is almost one-year time lag. (2) Based on the valuation model of Feltham and Ohlson (1995), the capitalization model shows that companies with high R&D intensities have a smaller coefficient for the book value, a greater coefficient for abnormal accounting earnings and higher explanatory power in the valuation model, as compared to the expensing model. But for the less R&D intensity groups, the above effects are not significant.
    Relation: 會計評論, 33, 1-26
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6552%2fJOAR.2001.33.1
    DOI: 10.6552/JOAR.2001.33.1
    Appears in Collections:[會計評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2338View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback