English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23406066      Online Users : 147
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115348


    Title: 消費者對於企業社會失責之心理反應與行為傾向
    Authors: 張愛華
    Contributors: 企業管理學系
    Keywords: 企業社會失責;企業社責任;道德情緒反應;歸因理論
    corporate social irresponsibility;corporate social responsibility;attribution;negative moral emotion
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2017-12-25 14:40:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,雖有不少企業積極實施社會責任,但另一方面,企業社會失責行為(corporate social irresponsibility,CSI)亦時有所聞。學者定義 CSI 為企業行動導致對於他人的(潛在)不利或損害。並提出有意的及無意的 CSI 之分類。本計畫提出一個消費者對於企業失責行為的知覺、心理反應及行為意向的整合模型,試圖解釋(一)消費者面對企業社會失責行為(CSI)如何歸類其為有意的及無意的 CSI?此外,從歸因理論(attribution theory)之角度,又有哪些可能影響分類 CSI的因素?(二)消費者面對有意相對於無意的 CSI 時,其心理反應又有何不同? 外界專家資訊的不一致/矛盾是否會調節消費者負面行為意願? 除此之外,消費者對於該 CSI 事件的涉入程度,對於該品牌的原有關係是否影響其負面反應?(三)消費者因為 CSI 事件所引起的負面心理反應如何影響其行為反應?本計畫以調查法探討研究問題,共計回收244份有效資料。資料分析結果顯示,消費者對CSR的歸因會影響其對CSI的歸類,而消費者對CSI的歸類會影響消費者對企業產生的負面情緒反應進而影響後續的行為意願。此外,消費者對CSI的涉入程度、品牌承諾以及企業的回應誠意也有部分的調節效果。最後本計畫亦提出一些管理意涵供企業實務參考。
    Corporate social responsibility has been prevalent in nowadays. However, business misconducts have never been rare. Researchers in management academia have recently considered studying corporate social irresponsibility (CSI) could enrich the understanding of CSR and research interest has been emerged. Among other definitions, CSI is defined by Lin-Hi and Muller (2013) as “corporate actions that result in (potential) disadvantages and/or harm to other actors.” The present research aims to propose an integrated model explaining how consumers perceive CSI, their psychological reactions, and behavioral responses. Specially, this research addresses three set of research questions: (1). How would consumer categorize CSI into unintentional type and intentional type? Would consumer’s attribution for firm’s CSR motive has to do with the categorization, and would corporate brand social responsibility association (brand personality) effect CSI categorization? (2) What are the psychological reactions when consumers learn about a firm’s CSI? Would category of CSI influence psychological reactions? And whether consumer’s brand commitment and CSI involvement moderate “psychological reactions relationships – negative behavioral intention”? (3) What influence consumer’s willingness to punish firms that result in CSI? Furthermore, what influences consumer’s choice among behavioral response types? This project conducted a survey to investigate the research questions. There were 244 valid responses in total. The results showed that consumers’ CSR attribution had impacts on the CSI categorization. Moreover, consumers’ CSI categorization had impacts on their negative emotions which in turns had impacts on their relating behavioral intentions. Finally, consumers’ CSI involvement, brand commitment and perceived sincerity of response indeed had some moderating effects on the proposed relationship. This project also provided some managerial implications for businesses.
    Relation: 執行起迄:2014/08/01~2015/07/31
    103-2410-H-004-118
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    103-2410-H-004-118.pdf1155KbAdobe PDF151View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback