English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88657/118296 (75%)
Visitors : 23506187      Online Users : 265
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 統計學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/115627
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115627


    Title: Cosine similarity as a sample size-free measure to quantify phase clustering within a single neurophysiological signal
    Authors: 周珮婷
    徐慎謀
    Chou, Elizabeth P.
    Hsu, Shen-Mou
    Contributors: 統計系
    Keywords: Cosine similarity;ITC;Oscillations;Phase;Phase clustering
    Date: 2018-02
    Issue Date: 2018-01-24 17:31:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Background : Phase clustering within a single neurophysiological signal plays a significant role in a wide array of cognitive functions. Inter-trial phase coherence (ITC) is commonly used to assess to what extent phases are clustered in a similar direction over samples. However, this measure is especially dependent on sample size. Although ITC was transformed into ITCz, namely, Rayleigh’s Z, to “correct” for the sample-size effect in previous research, the validity of this strategy has not been formally tested. New method This study introduced cosine similarity (CS) as an alternative solution, as this measure is an unbiased and consistent estimator for finite sample size and is considered less sensitive to the sample-size effect. Results : In a series of studies using either artificial or real datasets, CS was robust against sample size variation even with small sample sizes. Moreover, several different aspects of examinations confirmed that CS could successfully detect phase-clustering differences between datasets with different sample sizes. Comparison with existing methods Existing measures suffer from sample-size effects. ITCz produced a mixed pattern of bias in assessing phase clustering according to sample size, whereas ITC overestimated the degree of phase clustering with small sample sizes. Conclusions : The current study not only reveals the incompetence of the previous “correction” measure, ITCz, but also provides converging evidence showing that CS may serve as an optimal measure to quantify phase clustering.
    Relation: Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Volume 295, Pages 111-120
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.007
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.007
    Appears in Collections:[統計學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    111120.pdf1939KbAdobe PDF209View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback