English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89686/119522 (75%)
Visitors : 23951618      Online Users : 610
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/115726
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115726


    Title: 初步公開說明書Form S-11資訊對REIT IPO之初期及後續表現的影響
    Can REIT IPO investors know ahead of time? An empirical study of Form S-11 information on post-IPO performance of REITs
    Authors: 潘慶儀
    Pun, Heng I
    Contributors: 陳明吉
    Chen, Ming Chi
    潘慶儀
    Pun, Heng I
    Keywords: 初次公開發行
    房地產投資信託基金
    IPO折價
    長期表現
    管理團隊品質
    承銷商聲譽
    管理結構
    閉鎖期
    IPO
    REIT
    Underpricing
    Long-run performance
    Management quality
    Underwriter reputation
    Management structure
    Lock-up period
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-02-02 10:54:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 利用1995-2015年間美國房地產投資信託基金(REIT)的176個初次公開發行為樣本,本研究分析了初步公開說明書(Form S-11)資訊與REITs上市後之當天,短期和長期表現之間的關係。其中,本文著重於探討四個特別領域的相關資訊,包括管理結構,承銷商聲譽,IPO閉鎖期及管理團隊品質。
    實證結果顯示,初步公開說明書(Form S-11)包含有價值的資訊,有助於REIT IPO 投資人作投資評估之使用。其中,IPO閉鎖期大於等於產業標準180天的REITs,其在上市後6個月和12個月期間的報酬率高於IPO閉鎖期小於180天的REITs。此外,與過去的IPO研究結果相似,由知名承銷商所銷售之REIT IPOs 在初次公開發行後的短期及長期表現平均優於由知名度較低之承銷商所銷售的REIT IPOs。
    然而,儘管過去與REIT相關的研究普遍偏好內部管理,本研究之實證結果支持外部管理的模式。其中,實證結果顯示外部管理的REITs在初次公開發行後的短期及長期表現平均優於內部管理的REITs。
    Using a sample of 176 US REIT IPOs from 1995 to 2015, this study examines the relationship between information provided on the preliminary IPO prospectus (form S-11) and post-IPO initial, short-term and long-term performance of REITs. In particular, this paper focuses on information related to four specific areas: management structure, underwriter reputation, lock-up period, and management quality.
    The findings of this study suggest that form S-11 carries valuable information, and is useful to investors in evaluating REIT IPOs. The regression results indicate that REIT IPOs with a lock-up period that is at least as long as the industry standard, on average, earn higher post-IPO returns 6-month and 12-month following the IPO date. Moreover, consistent with prior IPO studies, offerings underwritten by prestigious underwriters, on average, yield better post-IPO performance than IPOs underwritten by less reputable underwriters. Yet, unlike prior REIT studies, the findings of this paper tend to favor the external management structure. The results from the sub-sample imply externally managed REITs, on average, earn higher post-IPO short-term and long-term returns than their internally managed counterpart.
    Reference: Ahmad, W., & Jelic, R. (2014). Lockup Agreements and Survival of UK IPOs. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 41(5), 717-742.
    Ambrose, B., & Linneman, P. (2001). REIT Organizational Structure and Operating Characteristics. Journal of Real Estate Research, 21(3), 141-162.
    Bairagi, R. K., & Dimovski, W. (2011). The Underpricing of US REIT IPOs: 1996-2010. Journal of Property Research, 28(3), 233-248.
    Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top Management and Innovations in Banking: Does the Composition of the Top Team Make a Difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
    Beatty, R. P., & Ritter, J. R. (1986). Investment Banking, Reputation, and The Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 213-232.
    Beatty, R. P., & Welch, I. (1996). Issuer Expenses and Legal Liability in Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Law & Economics, 39(2), 545-602.
    Bradley, D. J., Jordan, B. D., Yi, H., & Roten, I. C. (2001). Venture Capital and IPO Lockup Expiration: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Research, 24(4), 465-493.
    Brau, J. C., Lambson, V. E., & McQueen, G. (2005). Lockups Revisited. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(3), 519-530.
    Capozza, D. R. & Seguin, P. J. (2000). Debt, Agency, and Management Contracts in REITs: The External Advisor Puzzle. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 20(2), 91-116.
    Carter, R. B., Dark, F. H., & Singh A. K. (1998). Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long-Run Performance of IPO Stocks. Journal of Finance, 53(1), 285-311.
    Carter, R., & Manaster, S. (1990). Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation. Journal of Finance, 45(4), 1045-1067.
    Chemmanur, T. J., & Paeglis, I. (2005). Management Quality, Certification, and Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 76, 331-368.
    Chen, H., Fok, R., & Lu, C. (2011). An Analysis of Lockups in REIT IPOs. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 43(3), 359-384.
    Cohen, B. D., & Dean, T. J. (2005). Information Asymmetry and Investor valuation of IPOs: Top Management Team Legitimacy as a Capital Market Signal. Strategic Management Journal. 26, 683-390.
    Chua, A. (2014). Market Conditions, Underwriter Reputation and First Day Return of IPOs. Journal of Financial Markets, 19, 131-153.
    Dimovski, B., Ratcliffe, C., & Keneley, M. (2017). Another Piece of the Puzzle: REIT IPO underpricing After the Financial Crisis. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 35(3), 264-276.
    Dolvin, S. D., & Pyles, M. K. (2009). REIT IPOs and the Cost of Going Public. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 39(1), 92-106.
    Ernst & Young. (2017). Internal vs. External Management Structures. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-internal-vs-external-management-structures/$FILE/ey-internal-vs-external-management-structures.pdf.
    Joel-Carbonell, A., & Rottke, N. B. (2009). Efficient Markets Versus Behavioral Anomalies: The Case of REITs. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, 27(4), 413-424.
    Kuhle, J. L. (1992). The Long-Term Performance of Real Estate Investment Trusts. Real Estate Finance, 9(2), 25.
    Laopodis, N. (2009). REITs, the Stock Market and Economic Activity. Journal of Property Investment & Finance. 27(6), 563-578.
    Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2013). IPO First-Day Returns, Offer Price Revisions, Volatility, and Form S-1 Language. Journal of Financial Economics, 109, 307-326.
    Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (2004). Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time? Financial Management, 5-37.
    Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The New Issues Puzzle. Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23-51.
    National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. (2017). Guide to Equity REITs. Retrieved from https://www.reit.com/what-reit/types-reits/guide-equity-reits.
    National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. (2017). REIT Industry Financial Snapshot. Retrieved from https://www.reit.com/data-research/reit-market-data/reit-industry-financial-snapshot.
    National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts. (2017). What’s a REIT? Retrieved from https://www.reit.com/what-reit.
    Ritter, J. R. (1991). The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Finance, 46(1), 3-27.
    Rock, K. (1986). Why New Issues Are Underpriced. Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 187-212.
    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2010). Important Information About EDGAR. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov/edgar/aboutedgar.htm.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    105357033
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105357033
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    703301.pdf1098KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback