English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 83053/111947 (74%)
造訪人次 : 21712453      線上人數 : 717
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/115869
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115869


    題名: An analysis on Han Yuanzhen's Survey of the Sameness and Differences of Zhu Xi's Discourses (Zhuzi yanlun tongyikao) -Taking Great Learning (Daxue) and Doctrine of the Mean (Zhongyong) as the Surveying Range
    韓元震《朱子言論同異考》析論――以《大學》、《中庸》為考察範圍
    作者: 陳逢源
    Chen, Feng-Yuan
    貢獻者: 中文系
    關鍵詞: 韓元震;《朱子言論同異考》;朱熹;四書;朝鮮儒學
    Han Won-Jin;Survey of the Sameness and Differences of Zhu Xi's Discourses (Zhuzi yanlun tongyikao);Zhu Xi;Four Books;Confucianism in Korea
    日期: 2017-12
    上傳時間: 2018-02-07 13:50:16 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 韓元震(1682-1751)由「氣」見「理」,以「氣」論「心」,立場鮮明,為栗谷學派後起健將,與同門李柬(1677-1727)針對「人物性同異」問題,產生相異的見解,往復辯論,形成朝鮮後期一場重要的學術論爭,稱為「湖洛論爭」或是「湖洛是非」。事實上,韓氏撰有《朱子言論同異考》,全書六卷,共計三十九門,並附以《論孟輯註或問》,由義理而及於經解,乃至於史傳文字等,朱熹學術無不涉及,牽涉既廣,體系龐大,本文以《大學》、《中庸》為範圍,考察韓元震於朱熹書信、語錄、經解文字當中,分析相歧說法,以定朱熹學術究竟,細節之間,得見朱熹反覆錘鍊,一生思索的歷程,從而在後人以朱證朱的詮釋方式當中,甚至援朱以附陸的情況下,引導回歸於朱熹學術思考正途,在理學、心學之分,漢學、宋學之辨,門戶歧出當中,得以樹立朝鮮學術主體地位,對於朱學詮釋也具有推進作用。
    Han Won-Jin (1682-1751), an outstanding scholar of Yulgok School, learned "principle (li)" from "material-force (qi)" and then interpreted "mind (xin)" base on "principle." He had clear theoretical standpoint and argued the issue titled "Sameness or Differences between Human Nature and Animal Nature" with his fellow, Lee Gan (1677-1727). Their arguments formed Huluo Debate, an important academic discussion in Korea. In fact, through investigating the ordinance of Confucianism, annotations on classics, and historical texts, Han composed Survey of the Sameness and Differences of Zhu Xi's Discourses (Zhuzi yanlun tongyikao). There are six volumes and thirty-nine categories in this book, which is also attached Questions on Annotations of Analects of Confucius and Mencius (Lunmeng zhangju huowen). Since the system of Zhu Xi's doctrine is very extensive, I take Great Learning (Daxue) and Doctrine of the Mean (Zhongyong) as the surveying range to analyze Han Yuanzhen's explanations of Zhu Xi's letters, dicta, and annotations on classics. In this paper, I will clarify Zhu Xi's academic achievement and lifelong thinking process according to the interpretations of researchers of Zhu Xi's works, who proved Zhu's ideas through Zhu's own discourses or even quoted Zhu's words to compare with Lu Jiuyuan's explanations. Their careful studies, which distinguish between Philosophy of Principle (lixue) and Philosophy of Mind (xinxue), as well as Han School and Song School, help readers to understand Zhu Xi's thought correctly. They not only established the subject of Zhu's study in Korea but also carried forward Zhu's study unceasingly.
    關聯: 東華漢學, No.26期, pp.65-106
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    65-105.pdf2791KbAdobe PDF120檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋