English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 20 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90029/119959 (75%)
Visitors : 24035945      Online Users : 160
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/115899
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115899


    Title: The Feature of Insurance Solicitor Service Contract and Regulations Governing the Supervision of Insurance Solicitors -- Comment on Taiwan Administrative Supreme Court Judgement Pan Zi No. 2117 (2011)
    保險業務員勞務契約之特徵與保險業務員管理規則--最高行政法院100年度判字第2117號判決評釋
    Authors: 葉啟洲
    Yeh, Chi-Chou
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: 保險業務員;從屬性;專屬招攬;保險監理;勞動契約
    Insurance Solicitor;Dependency;Exclusive Solicit;Insurance Supervisory;Employment Contract
    Date: 2016-05
    Issue Date: 2018-02-07 14:25:19 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 保險業務員與保險公司間之契約關係,究屬勞動、委任、抑或承攬契約,將嚴重影響保險公司是否應提撥勞工退休金。事實上保險業務員與保險公司間契約關係,並非僅限勞動、委任或承攬關係中之一種,其係依照不同業務員之需求而設計不同法律關係。本文所評釋的最高行政法院100年度判字第2117號判決,以保險業務員管理規則作為論斷保險業務員與保險公司間之契約關係屬性。蓋保險業務員管理規則係主管機關對保險公司之行政管理規範,其主體為主管機關與保險公司,不同於保險業務員與保險公司間契約關係,其主體乃為保險業務員與保險公司,該判決未注意保險監理與私法自治原則之差異,並不妥當。
    What’s kind of contract relationship between insurance solicitor and insurance company? Is belonged to employment contract, retainer contract or Independent contractor? The contract relationship between insurance solicitor and insurance company will determine whether insurance company prepares to save pension before hiring. In fact, the contract relationship between insurance solicitor and insurance company is not limited to one type of contract which has been mentioned (employment contract, retainer contract or Independent contractor). The contract relationship may be designed to every insurance solicitor’s need. Taiwan Administrative Supreme Court Judgement Pan Zi No. 2117 (2011) which commented by this article, recognizing the contract relationship between insurance solicitor and insurance company by Regulations Governing the Supervision of Insurance Solicitors (hereafter GSIS). However, GSIS is belong to an administrative management regulation, and competent authority use GSIS to supervise insurance company. The subjects of GSIS relationship are competent authority and insurance company. In contrast to GSIS relationship, the contract relationship between insurance solicitor and insurance company, their subject is belonged to insurance solicitor and insurance company. Taiwan Administrative Supreme Court Judgement Pan Zi No. 2117 (2011) obviously doesn’t recognize the difference between insurance supervisory and autonomy principle.
    Relation: 法令月刊, Vol.67, No.5, pp.51-66
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6509%2fTLM.2016.6705.03
    DOI: 10.6509/TLM.2016.6705.03
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML166View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback