English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23399019      Online Users : 104
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/116923
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116923


    Title: Identifying effective e-teaching and general mathematical teaching profiles to predict student mathematical cognition and affect by latent profile analysis
    辨識可預測學生數學認知和情意的有效E化和一般數學教學法組合
    Authors: 邱美秀
    Chiu, Mei-Shiu
    Contributors: 教育系
    Keywords: e-teaching;latent profile analysis;mathematics affect;mathematics cognition;mathematics pedagogy
    E化教學;潛在剖面分析;數學情意;數學認知;數學教學法
    Date: 2017-10
    Issue Date: 2018-04-23 14:18:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: The aim of this study was to identify the profiles of approaches to e-teaching and general teaching (g-teaching) and to explore the differences between the profiles in terms of student mathematical cognition and affect. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was applied to evaluate 3,978 Taiwanese 15-year-old students’ perceived e-teaching and g-teaching behaviors (formative assessment, student orientation, and teacher direction) in mathematics classrooms. LPA identified four e/g-teaching profiles: parsimony, conservation, moderation, and liberal. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and post hoc tests were used to examine profile differences in each element of cognition and affect; structural equation modeling (SEM) was used in latent constructs of cognition and affect. The combined MANOVA and SEM results indicated that moderation e/g-teaching benefits both cognition and affect, parsimony benefits cognition at the expense of affect, and both conservation and liberal benefit affect.
    本研究旨在辨識E化和一般數學教學法的組合類型,並探討所辨識出的教學組合類型在學生數學認知和情意上的差異情形。以潛在剖面分析(LPA)方法分析3,978名臺灣15歲學生在數學教室中的E化數學教學和三項一般性的數學教學法(形成性評量、學生導向和教師指導)。LPA的結果辨識出四種E化與一般數學教學法組合:節約、保守、協調和自由使用E化與一般數學教學法的組合。接著,使用多變量變異數分析(MANOVA)和事後檢驗,來考驗四種教學法組合在學生各數學認知和情意細項內容上的差 異,並且使用結構方程模式(SEM)考驗四種教學法組合在認知和情意二潛在構念上的差異。MANOVA和SEM的分析結果顯示:協調的E化與一般數學教學法組合同時有益於學生認知和情意,節約的E化與一般數學教學組合有利認知但犧牲情意,保守和自由的E化與一般數學教學組合有利於情意。
    Relation: 臺灣數學教育期刊, 4(2), 69-94
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6278/tjme.20171018.001
    DOI: 10.6278/tjme.20171018.001
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    6994.pdf1356KbAdobe PDF178View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback