English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46260314      Online Users : 731
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118033


    Title: Justice and Law in the Republic and Mencius
    《理想國篇》與《孟子》正義及法律思想研究
    Authors: 陳起行
    Contributors: 法科所
    Keywords: 柏拉圖;理想國;孟子;德行;正義;法治
    Date: 2017-09
    Issue Date: 2018-06-26 17:19:50 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文試圖整理柏拉圖《理想國篇》以及《孟子》文本中的正義及法律思想。柏拉圖將靈魂三分與城邦三種基本族群相對應，指出心靈及城邦各部分形成和諧整體，需要能實踐正義此一德行。理性調和情慾，如同哲學家協調武士及生產者般，具關鍵性。法治則是哲君提升人民德行的重要途徑。在儒家思想中，孟子進一步闡明「義」此一德行，主張仁義等均為人與生俱來，需要持續培養的德行。義、德在於人處社會應對之合宜，仁則是人探求合宜課題之歸所。以舜為例，孟子更重視人的家庭關係，尤其人們對於父母兄弟的孝與愛。柏拉圖思想較之蘇格拉底更重視數理，不但在古希臘思想發展上，開啟重要的脈絡，也使古中國儒家與古希臘思想的分歧，更為明顯。
    This article presents a sketch and a comparison of two perspectives of justice. I discuss Plato’s idea of justice in the Republic (section 2), and Mencius’ thinking on the same topic in Mencius (section 3). For Plato, justice leads to harmony and reason is the key element, especially for getting hold of the good, and for unifying the different parts of the soul successfully; likewise, the philosopher should rule the polis for the unification of the three classes of people in the polis. Mencius treats yi, the concept which is comparable to justice, similarly to Plato, namely as one’s proper relationship with others, except one’s parents who are not considered as others. For Mencius, Yi is shown in one’s lifelong commitment to act appropriately in all the situations one encounters in the world. Ren is shown in one’s love of others and guides one in a more important way than reason for one’s cultivation of yi.
    Relation: NTU Law Review, vol.12, no.2, pp.177-198
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/181263242017091202001
    DOI: 10.3966/181263242017091202001
    Appears in Collections:[法律科際整合研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    177198.pdf441KbAdobe PDF2493View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback