English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46207956      Online Users : 915
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118204


    Title: 產品多樣性對需求風險的影響
    The impact of product variety on demand risk
    Authors: 林育如
    Lin, Yu-Ju
    Contributors: 簡睿哲
    Jean, Ruey-Jer
    林育如
    Lin, Yu-Ju
    Keywords: 供應鏈風險
    需求風險
    需求不確定性
    產品多樣性
    制度發展
    Supply chain risk
    Demand risk
    Demand uncertainty
    Product variety
    Institutional development
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-07-03 17:21:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 供應鏈管理不只是包含採購、生產、或物流等傳統活動,還包含與供應鏈夥伴之間的合作。供應鏈風險一直是一個熱門的議題,因為存在於供應鏈中的風險可能會造成供應鏈中的供需失衡。為了要管理供應鏈風險,公司間會採用整合策略像是VMI模式。許多過去的研究由整體觀點來看供應鏈整合對供應鏈表現的影響,鮮少研究專門以供應商的觀點出發。在VMI模式中,當下游廠商負責需求預估,供應商也在尋求可以控制需求風險的方法,其中一種有效方式是調整產品組合。在本研究中,我們實證出產品多樣性與需求風險有U型關係。此外,我們融入制度理論,將制度發展變數(市場化指數和政府對R&D的補助)納入研究中,資料來自於中國的一間半導體通路商,並以倉庫作為研究單位。研究結果顯示制度發展會使產品多樣性對需求風險的影響趨緩。
    Supply chain management does not only contain traditional activities like procurement, production, and logistic, but also cooperation with supply chain partners. Supply chain risk has been a popular issue since it cause disruption in supply chain. To manage supply chain risk, companies adopt integration strategies such as vendor managed inventory (VMI). Many studies focus on macro scope to study impact of integration on supply chain performance; few studies draw on attention from view of suppliers. While downstream partner takes charge of demand forecast, vendor also seeks a way to control demand uncertainty. One way to manage demand uncertainty is adjusting product portfolio. We empirically examined the U-shape relationship between product variety and demand risk. In addition, this study merge institutional theory, enclosing institutional variables (marketization degree and government support on R&D) at hub level in China. The result indicate that institutional development weakens the negative effect of product variety.
    Reference: Cai, S., Jun, M., & Yang, Z. (2010). Implementing supply chain information integration in China: The role of institutional forces and trust. Journal of Operations Management, 28(3), 257-268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.005
    Cardozo, R. N., & Smith, D. K. (1983). Applying Financial Portfolio Theory to Product Portfolio Decisions: An Empirical Study. Journal of Marketing, 47(2), 110-119. doi:10.2307/1251498
    Cecil North, D. (1990). Institutional Change and Economic Performance.
    Child, J., & Tse, D. K. (2001). China`s Transition and Its Implications for International Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(1), 5-21.
    Chong, J.-K., Ho, T., & Tang, C. (2005). Demand Modeling in Product Line Trimming: Substitutability and Variability (Vol. 16).
    Corredoira, R. A., & McDermott, G. A. (2014). Adaptation, bridging and firm upgrading: How non-market institutions and MNCs facilitate knowledge recombination in emerging markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(6), 699-722. doi:10.1057/jibs.2014.19
    Debora Viana Thompson, Rebecca W. Hamilton, & Rust, R. T. (2005). Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(4), 431-442. doi:10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.4.431
    DiMaggio, P. J. (1983). State expansion and organizational fields. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. doi:10.2307/2095101
    Dong, M. C., Ju, M., & Fang, Y. (2016). Role hazard between supply chain partners in an institutionally fragmented market. Journal of Operations Management, 46, 5-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.07.006
    Feldman, E., Lehrer, F. A., & Ray, T. L. (1966). Warehouse Location under Continuous Economies of Scale. Management Science, 12(9), 670-684.
    Gao, G., Murray, J., Kotabe, M., & Lu, J. (2010). A “strategy tripod” perspective on export behaviors: Evidence from domestic and foreign firms based in an emerging economy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(3), 377-396. doi:10.1057/jibs.2009.27
    Gao, Y., Shu, C., Jiang, X., Gao, S., & Page, A. L. (2017). Managerial ties and product innovation: The moderating roles of macro- and micro-institutional environments. Long Range Planning, 50(2), 168-183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.11.005
    Gu, J., Goetschalckx, M., & McGinnis, L. F. (2010). Research on warehouse design and performance evaluation: A comprehensive review. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(3), 539-549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.07.031
    Haans, R., Constant, P., & He, Z. L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐ and inverted U‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177-1195. doi:doi:10.1002/smj.2399
    Harrison, A., & Christopher, M. (1999). Creating the Agile Supply Chain: Institute of Logistics.
    Hasan, I., Wachtel, P., & Zhou, M. (2009). Institutional development, financial deepening and economic growth: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(1), 157-170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.11.016
    Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS : A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation , Moderation , and Conditional Process Modeling 1.
    Huang, X., Gattiker, T. F., & Schroeder, R. G. (2010). Do Competitive Priorities Drive Adoption of Electronic Commerce Applications? Testing the Contingency and Institutional Views. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(3), 57-69. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03198.x
    Huo, B., Han, Z., Zhao, X., Zhou, H., Wood, C. H., & Zhai, X. (2013). The impact of institutional pressures on supplier integration and financial performance: Evidence from China. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 82-94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.013
    Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. (2008). Comparing capitalisms: understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 540-561. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400375
    Jacobs, M. A., & Swink, M. (2011). Product portfolio architectural complexity and operational performance: Incorporating the roles of learning and fixed assets. Journal of Operations Management, 29(7), 677-691. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.03.002
    Kahn, J. A. (1987). Inventories and the Volatility of Production. The American Economic Review, 77(4), 667-679.
    Kannan, G., Grigore, M. C., Devika, K., & Senthilkumar, A. (2013). An analysis of the general benefits of a centralised VMI system based on the EOQ model. International Journal of Production Research, 51(1), 172-188. doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.653838
    Kiggundu, M. N., xf, rgensen, J. J., & Hafsi, T. (1983). Administrative Theory and Practice in Developing Countries: A Synthesis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 66-84. doi:10.2307/2392387
    Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.
    Luce, R. D., & Raiffa, H. (1957). Games and decisions: Introduction and critical survey. Oxford, England: Wiley.
    March, J. G., & Shapira, Z. (1987). Managerial Perspectives on Risk and Risk Taking. Management Science, 33(11), 1404.
    Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio Selection
    Efficient Diversification of Investments: Yale University Press.
    Mehrjoo, M., & Pasek, Z. J. (2014). Impact of Product Variety on Supply Chain in Fast Fashion Apparel Industry. Procedia CIRP, 17, 296-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.01.082
    Miller, R. B. (2006). Taming the Volatile Sales Cycle. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(2), 10.
    Min, H. (2015). The Essentials of Supply Chain Management: New Business Concepts and Applications: PH Professional Business.
    Peng, M. W. (2003). Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices. The Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 275-296. doi:10.2307/30040713
    Randall, T., & Ulrich, K. (2001). Product Variety, Supply Chain Structure, and Firm Performance: Analysis of the U.S. Bicycle Industry. Management Science, 47(12), 1588-1604. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.12.1588.10237
    Scott, W. R. (1987). The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493-511. doi:10.2307/2392880
    Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Shibin Sheng, Kevin Zheng Zhou, & Li, J. J. (2011). The Effects of Business and Political Ties on Firm Performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75(1), 1-15. doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.1.1
    Shin, N., Kraemer, K. L., & Dedrick, J. (2017). R&D and firm performance in the semiconductor industry. Industry and Innovation, 24(3), 280-297. doi:10.1080/13662716.2016.1224708
    Smith, S. A., & Agrawal, N. (2000). Management of Multi-Item Retail Inventory Systems with Demand Substitution. Operations Research, 48(1), 50-64. doi:10.1287/opre.48.1.50.12443
    Su, Q., Shi, J.-h., & Lai, S.-j. (2008). Study on supply chain management of Chinese firms from the institutional view. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 362-373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.11.016
    Su, Z., Peng, M. W., & Xie, E. (2016). A Strategy Tripod Perspective on Knowledge Creation Capability. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 58-76. doi:doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12097
    Sun, S. L., Peng, M. W., & Tan, W. (2017). Institutional relatedness behind product diversification and international diversification. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(2), 339-366. doi:10.1007/s10490-016-9498-4
    Tang, C. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451-488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006
    Tang, C., & Tomlin, B. (2008). The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), 12-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.008
    Thonemann, U. W., & Bradley, J. R. (2002). The effect of product variety on supply-chain performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 143(3), 548-569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00343-5
    Ton, Z., & Raman, A. (2010). The Effect of Product Variety and Inventory Levels on Retail Store Sales: A Longitudinal Study. Production and Operations Management, 19(5), 546-560. doi:doi:10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01120.x
    Vos, G. C. J. M. (1993). International manufacturing and logistics : a design method. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven.
    Waller, M., Johnson, M. E., & Davis, T. (1999). Vendor-managed inventory in the retail supply chain. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 183-203.
    Wan, X., Evers, P. T., & Dresner, M. E. (2012). Too much of a good thing: The impact of product variety on operations and sales performance. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 316-324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.12.002
    Wan, X., & Sanders, N. R. (2017). The negative impact of product variety: Forecast bias, inventory levels, and the role of vertical integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 186(Supplement C), 123-131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.02.002
    Wang, D. T., & Chen, W. Y. (2014). Foreign direct investment, institutional development, and environmental externalities: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 135, 81-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.013
    Wong, C. Y., & Boon-itt, S. (2008). The influence of institutional norms and environmental uncertainty on supply chain integration in the Thai automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 400-410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.012
    Wu, G.-C., Ding, J.-H., & Chen, P.-S. (2012). The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 618-636. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.023
    Xia, N., & Rajagopalan, S. (2009). Standard vs. Custom Products: Variety, Lead Time, and Price Competition. Marketing Science, 28(5), 887-900. doi:10.1287/mksc.1080.0456
    Xie, Z., & Li, J. (2018). Exporting and innovating among emerging market firms: The moderating role of institutional development. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2), 222-245. doi:10.1057/s41267-017-0118-4
    Yaibuathet, K., Enkawa, T., & Suzuki, S. (2008). Influences of institutional environment toward the development of supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 262-271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.02.018
    Zhang, Y., Li, H., Li, Y., & Zhou, L.-A. (2010). FDI spillovers in an emerging market: the role of foreign firms` country origin diversity and domestic firms` absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 969-989. doi:10.1002/smj.856
    Zhou, Y. M., & Wan, X. (2017). Product variety, sourcing complexity, and the bottleneck of coordination. Strategic Management Journal, 38(8), 1569-1587. doi:10.1002/smj.2619
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    104351005
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104351005
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IB.002.2018.F06
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100501.pdf2464KbAdobe PDF218View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback