Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118221
|
| Title: | 影響高中學生學習表現之研究
A Study of Affecting Learning Performance of Junior High School Students |
| Authors: | 張芃婕 |
| Contributors: | 鄭宇庭
張芃婕 |
| Keywords: | 決策樹分析
高中教育
學習表現
學習投入
Decision tree analysis
High school education
Learning performance
Learning engagement |
| Date: | 2018 |
| Issue Date: | 2018-07-03 17:23:56 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以103學年度全國高二普通科學生為分析對象，將學生特性歸類為行為學習投入、情緒學習投入、認知學習投入與人口統計變項。首先透過統計分析了解資料之特性，接續採用卡方檢定，以篩選重要之變項，而後再以分類決策樹模型，分別針對不同學習表現之學生建構其模型，以釐清各學習表現之學生特性。研究結果發現，高二學生之情緒學習投入與行為學習投入向度較為顯著；而高度學習表現之學生對學校課程感興趣程度有明顯的特性；中度學習表現之學生在課外閱讀、社團和運動方面，投入程度較為明顯；對於低度學習表現之學生，在課程感興趣程度及自我期許上，有其明顯特性。研究結果可提供高中教育教學實務之參考。
This study analyzes the senior high students of general education in second grade in 2015 all over the country, and the variables of student characteristics are divided into behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, and demographic variables. First, the distribution of student characteristics, measured by this research definition, is used to realize the patterns of data. Choose the important variables by the Chi-square test. And then, use the decision tree analysis to construct three models of learning performance to clarify the student characteristics in different models. The results show that the dimensions of emotional engagement and behavioral engagement are more significant；For the students in high-end learning performance, the pattern of level interest for lessons in schools is obvious；The level of engagement on extracurricular reading, club, and exercise for the students in mid-level learning performance is significant.；For the students in low-end learning performance, the patterns of level interest for lessons in schools and self-expectations are obvious. The results of the study would provide some reference for teaching in senior high school. |
| Reference: | 余民寧(2006)，影響學習成就因素的探討，教育資料與研究雙月刊，73，頁11-24。
林俊瑩、黃毅志(2008)，影響台灣地區學生學業成就的可能機制：結構方成模式的探究，台灣教育社會學研究，八卷一期，頁45-88。
張芳全(2011)，家長教育程度、文化資本、自我抱負、學習興趣與數學成就之關係研究，台中教育大學學報，25(1)，頁29-56。
張芳全、詹秀雯(2014)，影響國中生學習成就因素之研究，台中教育大學學報：教育類，28(1)，頁49-76。
張春興(1998)，現代心理學，台北市：東華。
張家鳳(2004)，利用資料挖掘技術建構保險業之差異化行銷模型，世新大學資訊管理系碩士班論文。
張鈿富、林松柏、周文菁(2012)，台灣高中學生學習投入影響因素之研究，教育資料集刊，第54期，頁27-30。
陳玫伸(2006)，台北縣高中生社團參與態度及自我效能之相關研究，台灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系在職進修碩士班學位論文。
鄭中平、許清芳(2015)，R在行為科學之應用，台北市：雙葉。
Angell, L. R. (2009). Construct validity of the community college survey of student engagement (CCSSE). Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33(7), 564-570.
Appleton, J. J., S. L. Christenson & M. J. Furlong (2008). Student Engagement with School: Critical Conceptual and Methodological Issues of the Construct, Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 380.
Audas, R. & J. D. Willms (2002). Engagement and dropping out of school: A
life-course perspective. Applied Research Branch, Human Resources Development Canada.
Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 200-215.
Brophy, J. E. (2013). Motivating students to learn. Routledge.
Carini, R. M., G. D. Kuh & S. P. Klein (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1-32.
Chapman, E. (2003). Assessing Student Engagement Rates. ERIC Digest.
Christenson, S. L. & A. R. Anderson (2002). Commentary: The centrality of the learning context for students’ academic enabler skills. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 378 – 393.
Connell, J. P. & J. G. Wellborn (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness:
A motivational analysis of self-system processes.
Downer, J. T, Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children`s risk for school problems contribute to children`s behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36(3), 413.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
Finn, J. D. & D. A. Rock (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221–234.
Fisher, C., D. Berliner, N. Filby, R. Marliave, L. Cahen & M. Dishaw (1980). Teaching behaviours, academic learning time, and student achievement: An overview. In C. Denham & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Time to Learn. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Education.
Fredericks, J. A., P. Blumenfeld, J. Friedel & A. Paris (2005). School engagement. In What do children need to flourish? Springer US., 305-321.
Fredricks, J. A., B. Phyllis & A. H. Parks (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Friedman, J. H., L. Breiman, R. A. Olshen & C. J. Stone (1983). Classification and Regression Trees.
Frydenberg, E., M. Ainley & V. J. Russell (2005). Student motivation and engagement.
Furlong, M. J., A. D. Whipple, G. S. Jean, J. Simental, A. Soliz & S. Punthuna (2003). Multiple contexts of school engagement: Moving toward a unifying framework for educational research and practice. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 99-113.
Harper, S. R. & S. J. Quaye (2009). Beyond sameness, with engagement and outcomes for all: An introduction. In S. R. Harper & S. J. Quaye (Eds.), Student engagement in higher education: Theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations , New York, NY: Routledge,1-15.
Hu, S., G. D. Kuh & S. Li (2008). The effects of engagement in inquiry-oriented activities on student learning and personal development. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 71-81.
Jimerson, S. R., E. Campos & J. L. Greif (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7-27.
Kass, G. V. (1980). An Exploratory Technique for Investigating Large Quantities of Categorical Data. Applied Statistics, 20, 2, 119-127.
Klem, A. M. & J. P. Connell (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of school health, 74(7), 262-273.
Koehler, M. S. & D. A. Grouws (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In D. A. Crouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning ,115-126.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35(2), 24-32.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009(141), 5-20.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lamborn, S., Newmann, F., & Wehlage, G. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, 11-39.
Libby, H. P. (2004). Measuring student relationships to school: Attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. Journal of school health, 74(7), 274-283.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American educational research journal, 37(1), 153-184.
McIntyre, D.J., Copenhaver, R.W., Byrd, D.M., & Norris, W.R. (1983). A study of engaged student behaviour within classroom activities during mathematics class. Journal of Educational Research, 77(1), 55-59.
Mosher, R., & MacGowan, B. (1985). Assessing Student Engagement in Secondary Schools: Alternative Conceptions, Strategies of Assessing, and Instruments.
National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine (2004). Engaging Schools: Fostering High School Students’ Motivation To Learn. Committee on Increasing High School Students’ Engagement and Motivation to Learn. Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Division of Behavioral and Social Science and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 14-24.
Newmann, F., G. Wehlage & S. Lamborn (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools, 11-39.
Nystrand, M. & A. Gamoran (1992). Instructional discourse and student engagement. In Schunk, D. H. & J. Meece (Eds.), Student Perceptions in the Classroom , Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,149-179.
Pike, G. R., J. C. Smart, G. D. Kuh & J. C. Hayek (2006). Educational expenditures and student engagement: When does money matter? Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 847-872.
Prater, M. A. (1992). Increasing time-on-task in the classroom: Suggestions for improving the amount of time learners spend in on-task behaviors. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28(1), 22-27.
Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1), 81-106.
Quinlan, J. R. (1993). C4.5:Programs for Machine Learning. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann.
Skinner, E. A. & M. J. Belmont (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of educational psychology, 85(4), 571.
Skinner, E. A., J. G. Wellborn & J. P. Connell (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: The role of perceived control in children’s engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22–32.
Thiessen, V. & J. Blasius (2008). Mathematics achievement and mathematics learning strategies: Cognitive competencies and construct differentiation. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 362-371.
Walker, C. O. & B. A. Greene (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 463-472.
Williams, T., K. Williams, D. Kastberg & L. Jocelyn (2005). Achievement and affect in OECD nations. Oxford Review of Education, 31(4), 517-545.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Educational Policy, Indiana University.
Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2010). Charting the path form engagement to achievement: A report on the 2009 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
統計學系
1043540111 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1043540111 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.STAT.003.2018.B03 |
| Appears in Collections: | [統計學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 011101.pdf | 1915Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2690 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
