English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 83053/111947 (74%)
造訪人次 : 21697370      線上人數 : 527
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118306


    題名: 金磚國家與上海合作組織對中印關係 之影響
    The Impact of the BRICS and SCO on Sino-Indian Relations
    作者: 唐霓
    Tartinville, Marie
    貢獻者: 林永芳
    Lin, Yung-Fang
    唐霓
    Marie Tartinville
    關鍵詞: 金磚國家
    上海合作組織
    中國
    印度
    BRICS
    Shanghai cooperation organization
    China
    India
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-07-03 17:37:30 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本篇碩士論文透過新自由制度主義的觀點探討中印之間的關係。更準確地說, 儘管自 1990年代以來,中國與印度的經濟交流不斷增加,中國和印度之間仍實際存在 著經濟和政治緊張局勢,作者試圖探討此一現象。事實上,長期存在的領土糾紛和貿 易不平衡導致保護主義行為(以印度工業為例)以及兩國邊界頻繁的軍事行動。作者 認為透過國際組織進行多方的爭端管理可以改善中印關係。根據新自由制度主義,國 際組織確實在國際關係中擔任衝突管理者的角色。因此,作者選擇分析金磚國家和上 海合作組織作為中印之衝突管理者的案例。由於金磚國家的機構級別低下,而且在糾 紛管理方面缺乏經驗,看起來金磚五國對其關係的影響有限。相反地,由於以往在穩 定中亞局勢的經驗,上海合作組織似乎在中印的領土爭端方面提供了更重要的視角。 然而,這兩個國際組織仍有進步空間,才能在未來穩定中印關係方面發揮作用。作者 建議金磚國家建立一個以成員國經濟相互依存為重點的委員會,並負責開展可行性研 究以解決不平衡的貿易問題。上海合作組織應該制定領土爭端解決的官方程序,以作 為協議平台。因此,分析過後,作者認為,由於金磚國家、上海合作組織等國際組織 的共同努力,有助於中印雙方更進一步的合作與信任,未來中印關係得以改善。
    This Master Thesis explores Sino-Indian relations through the Neoliberal Institutionalist theory. More precisely, the author is trying to respond to the actual economic and political tensions remaining between China and India despite a growing economic interaction since the 1990’s. In fact, long-standing territorial disputes and unbalanced trade leads to protectionist behavior (in the case of the Indian Industry) and to frequent military actions at borders between the two countries. The author argues that dispute management on a multilateral level through International Organization could improve Sino-Indian Relations. Indeed International Organizations, according to the Neoliberal Institutionalist Theory, play a role in IR as conflict manager. As such, the author chose to analyze the case of the BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as conflict manager between China and India. As a result, it appears that the BRICS have a limited impact on their relationship due to its low level of institutions and its lack of experiences in dispute management. On the contrary, the SCO seems to offer a greater perspective in terms of territorial dispute settlements thanks to its former experiences in stabilizing Central Asia. However, both organizations need to be improved in order to play a role in stabilizing Sino-Indian relations in the future. The author suggests that the BRICS establishes a commission focused on member state economic interdependence and lead feasibility studies to address unbalanced trade. The SCO should elaborate an official process for territorial dispute settlement in order to serve as an agreement platform. Therefore, after analysis, the author thinks Sino-Indian relations could be improved in the future thanks to International Organizations such as the BRICS and the SCO which could contribute to better bilateral cooperation and trust building.
    參考文獻: English Language sources:
    Abashidze, Aslan; Solntsev, Alexandr; Kiseleva Ekaterina (2016): “Legal Status of BRICS and Some Trends of International Cooperation.” The Department of International Law, RUDN University, Moscow. In Indian Journal of Science and Technology 9 (36). Abbott, Kenneth W.; and Duncan Snidal (1998): “Why States Act through Formal International Organizations". In Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (1), pp. 3–32. Al-Qahtani, Mutlaq (2006): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Law of International Organizations.” In Chinese Journal International Affairs 5 (129). Aris, Stephen (2011): “Eurasian Regionalism. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization”; Book published by Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN: 978-0-230-22896-2 Asia Times (2005): “The Mother of all FTAs”. Available online at www.atimes.com/South_Asia/GC31Df06.html>. Axelrod, Robert (1984): “The Evolution of Cooperation.” Ayres, Alyssa (2017) “ How the BRICS got here. In Council on Foreign Relations.” Available online at https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/how-brics-got-here, checked on 12/9/2017. Bajpaee, Chietigj (2010a): “China-India Relations: Regional Rivalry Takes the World Stage.” In China Security 6 (2), pp. 3–20. Basu, Indrajit (2001): “ India Gins from Chinese WTO Accession.” In United Press International, checked on 1/4/2018. Boehmer, C.; Gartzke, E.; Nordstrom, T. (2004): “Do Intergovernmental Organizations Promote Peace? “In World Politics 57(1), pp. 1–38. BRICS Official Website: “History of BRICS.” In BRICS Information Portal. Available online at http://infobrics.org/page/history-of-brics/. Chayes, A.; Chayes A.H (1993): International Organization Vol. 47, checked on 12/12/2017. Chung, Chien Pen (2006): “China and the Institutionalization of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.” In Post problems of communism 53:5, pp. 3–14, checked on 9/24/2017. Cooper, Andrew F.; Farooq, Asif B. (2016): “The role of China and India in the G20 and BRICS: Commonalities or competitive behaviour?” In Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 45,3, pp. 73–106, checked on 11/27/2017. Dai, Xinyuan (2007): “ International Institutions and National Policies”; Cambridge University Press. Duffield, John (1992): "International Regimes and Alliance Behaviors: explaining NATO Conventional Force level". In International Organization 46 (4), pp. 819–855. Fearon, James D. (1998): “Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation.” In International Organization 52 (2), pp. 269–365. Gartzke, Erik (2007): “The Capitalist Peace.”. In American Journal of Political Science 51 (1), pp. pp. 166– 191. Available online at www.jstor.org/stable/4122913. Gentlemen, Amelia (2006): “ China and India Emphasize Cooperation.” In New York Times. Grossman, Derek (2017): “China Will Regret India's Entry Into the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.” In The Diplomat. Available online at https://thediplomat.com/2017/07/china-will-regretindias-entry-into-the-shanghai-cooperation-organization/, checked on 12/5/2017. Hensel, Paul R. (2001): “ Contentious issues and world politics: The management of territorial claims in the Americas.” In International Studies Quarterly 45 (1), pp. 81–109. Jain, B. M. (2003): “India-China Relations: Issues, Trends and emerging scenarios.” In China-India Project Occasional Paper N°1. Available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00358530410001679602?src=recsys, checked on 10/30/2017. Jorgensen, Knud Erik (2010): “International Relations Theory: A New Introduction. Chapter 3: The Liberal International Theory Tradition”, pp. 57–77, checked on 12/12/2017. Keohane, R.O; Nye, J. (1977): “Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition.” Boston: Little, Brown & Co., checked on 1/2/2018. Keohane, R. O. (1989): “ International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory.” In Boulder,Collo Westview, checked on 12/12/2017. Keohane, R. O. (1984): “After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy.” In Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Kirton, J. J., et al (2014): “Reference manual for summit commitment and compliance coding.” Available online at http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/evaluations/compliancemanual-140722.pdf. Koremenos, Barbara; Lipson, Charles; Snidal, Duncan (2001): “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” In International Organization Volume 55 Issue (4), pp. 761–799. Kumar Amb, Saurabh (2014): “ India-China Relations -An Introspection.” In International Strategic and Security Studies Programme National Institute of Advanced Studies India. Available online at http://nias.res.in/sites/default/files/India-China-An-Introspection1.pdf, checked on 10/28/2017. Larionova, M.; Shelepov, A. (2015): Book Chapter : “Is BRICS Institutionalization Enhancing Its Effectiveness?” pp 39-55. The European Union and the BRICS.: Springer, Cham. Mansfield, Edward; Pollins, Brian (2003): “Interdependence and Conflict: An Introduction.” Economic Interdependence and International Conflict. Available online at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1ffd/9f34195debd0d101d1e719d8eb39b05293a0.pdf, checked on 1/3/2018. Materson, James R. (2009): “Analyzing Economic Interdependence Theory and Conflict: The case of C hina.” Department of Geography, Government and History, Morehead State University, Morehead, Kentucky, USA, checked on 1/2/2018. McDermott, Roger N. (2012): “The SCO's impact on Central Asian Security. A view from Kazakhstan.” In Problem of Post-Communism 59 (4), pp. 56–65. Megan, Shannon (2009): “Preventing War and Providing the Peace?” International Organizations and the Management of Territorial Disputes 26 (2), pp. 144–153. Mielniczuck, Fabiano (2014): “The BRICS Economic Institutions and International Politics.” In E-International Relations. Available online at https://www.e-ir.info/2014/08/18/the-brics-economicinstitutions-and-international-politics/. Ministry of External Affairs, Governement of India (2003): “Declaration on Principles for Relations and Comprehensive Cooperation between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of India.” Mitchell, Ronald B. (1994): “Regime Design Matters: Intentional Oil Pollution and Treaty Compliance.” In International Organization 48 (3), pp. 425–458. Mitchell, Sara (2006): “Cooperation in World Politics: The Constraining and Constitutive Effects of International Organizations.” In Iowa Political Science Department 1 (1). Mohanty, S. K. (2014): “India-China Bilateral Trade Relationship”. Study prepared for Reserve Bank of India, checked on 1/4/2018. Morrow, James D. (1994): “Alliances, Credibility and Peacetime Costs.” In Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (2). Available online at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022002794038002005. Narayanan, Raviprasad (2003): “India's Foreign Policy Towards China.” In Harvard Asia Quaterly 7 (4), pp. 29–34, checked on 1/4/2018. Norling, Nicklas; Swanström, Niklas (2007): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization, trade, and the roles of Iran, India and Pakistan.” In Central Asian Survey 26 (3), pp. 429–444. Available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/02634930701702779. Pan, Guang (2004): “The Tashkent Summit Meeting: The Steady Advance of the SCO.”. In China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4. Peters, B.Guy (2012): “ Institutional Theory in Political Science. The new institutionalism. “ United States of America: The Continuum International Publishing Group, checked on 10/17/2017. Pevehouse, Jon C. (2002): “Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization.”. In International Organization 56 (3), pp. 515–549. Piekos, William; Elysabeth, C. (2015): “The Risks and Rewards of SCO Expansion.” In Council on Foreign Relations. Available online at https://www.cfr.org/expert-brief/risks-and-rewards-sco-expansion, checked on 12/2/2017. Richardson, James L. (2008): “The Ethics of Neoliberal Institutionalism”; edited by Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, checked on 12/12/2017. Scheineson, A. (2009): Retrieved from Council of Foreign Relations: Available online at http://www.cfr.org/china/shanghai-cooperationorganization/p10883. Schneider, D. K. (2016): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: A League of Autocracies?” Available online at https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/154general/25757.html. Skalnes, L. S. (1998): “From the outside in, from the inside out: NATO expansion and international relation theory.” In Security Studies 7, checked on 12/12/2017. Smith, Jeff (2017): “China-India Relations After Doklam. “In The Diplomat. Available online at https://thediplomat.com/2017/10/china-india-relations-after-doklam/, checked on 1/4/2017. Srivastava, Medha; Jauhar, Ameen (2016): “Brics dispute resolution mechanism: Challenges ahead, but promises much.” In Financial Express New Delhi. Stein, Arthur A. (2008): “Neoliberal Institutionalism. Chapter 11.” Oxford University Press: edited by Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal, checked on 12/12/2017. Stobdan, P. (2016): “The SCO: India enters Eurasia. In Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses.” Available online at https://idsa.in/policybrief/sco-india-enterseurasia_pstobdan_140616, checked on 11/30/2017. Surendra, Kumar (2013): “India and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Issues and Concerns.” In International Journal of China Studies 4 (3), pp. 343–349. Syroezhkin, Konstantin (2011): “The SCO’s Image Among Central AsianCountries is Close to Zero”. Available online at www.centrasia.ru/newsA.php?st=1301978160. Trofimove, D. (2003): “Arms Control in Central Asia.” In A. J. Bailes, Armament and Disarment in the Caucasus and Central Asia. In Stockholm: SIPRI, pp. pp. 46–56. UNAS Model United Nations (2017): “Shanghai Cooperation Organisation.” Primary Issue: The Question of conflict resolution and codes of conduct for territorial disputes. In UNAS Model United Nations Preparatory Conference 7th Edition. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2015): “China Vs India Population”. Available online at https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/. United Nations Official Website: Charter. Available online at http://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/chapter-vi/index.html. University of Toronto (2012): “2011 Sanya BRICS Summit Compliance Report.” BRICS Information Center. Available online at http://www.brics.utoronto.ca/compliance/2011-sanya.html. Viotti, Paul; Kauppi, Mark (2010): “International Relations Theory.” Fourth Edition: Longman, checked on 12/12/2017. Waheeda, Rana (2015): “Theory of Complex Interdependence: A Comparative Analysis of Realist and Neoliberal Thoughts.” PhD Scholar at Quaid- i-Azam University Islamabad & Assistant Professor at International Islamic University Islamabad. In International Journal of Business and Social Science 6, N°2. Available online at http://ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_6_No_2_February_2015/33.pdf, checked on 1/3/2018. Young (1982): “Regime dynamics: the rise and fall of international regimes.” International Organizations 36, checked on 12/12/2017. Yuan, Jingdong (2016): “Sino-Indian Economic Ties since 1998: Progress, Problems and Prospects for Future Development.” Non Traditionnal Security in Sino-Indian Relations. In Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 45, 3, pp. 31–71, checked on 1/4/2018. Zhang, Li (2010a): “China-India Relations Strategic Engagement and Challenges.” In Asie. Vision 34, checked on 11/4/2017. Zhang, Li (2010b): “India China Relations: How can they be improved.” In Asie. Vision 34, checked on 11/4/2017. Zhao, Huasheng (2006): “The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation at 5: Achievements and Challenges Ahead.”. In China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 4.

    French language sources: Cabestan, Jean-Pierre (2015) « La politique internationale de la Chine. Entre intégration et volonté de puissance » Sciences Po, checked on 3/11/2018.

    Russian language sources: Tolipov, Farkhad (2004): “K voprosu o samostoyatel’noi roli organizatsii tsentral’noaziatskogo sotrudnichestva v ramkakh ShOS.” In Tsentral’naya Aziya i Kavkaz 33 (3). Cited in “The Shanghai Cooperation Organization” by Aris Stephen (2011)
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
    105862009
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105862009
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IMPIS.001.2018.A06
    顯示於類別:[國際研究英語碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    200901.pdf1674KbAdobe PDF49檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋