Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118323
|
| Title: | 設計思維應用於產品開發之有效性探討 ─ 以藍瓶咖啡為例
The Effectiveness of the Application of Design Mindset to Product Development - A Case Study of Blue Bottle Coffee |
| Authors: | 謝慧霖
Hsieh, Hui-Lin |
| Contributors: | 巫立宇
林宜霓
Wu, Lei-Yu
Lin, Yi-Ni
謝慧霖
Hsieh, Hui-Lin |
| Keywords: | 設計思考
衝刺計畫
雙鑽石模型
藍瓶咖啡
Design thinking
Google sprint
The double diamond
Blue bottle coffee |
| Date: | 2018 |
| Issue Date: | 2018-07-03 17:39:28 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年來科技發展快速、產業轉型升級之風興盛，在此背景下「創新」也逐漸成為顯學，成為企業提升競爭力的重要因素之一。在創新的眾多面向中，本研究選擇從設計角度出發，探討設計思維如何應用於產品開發流程中。
以源於美國舊金山灣區之藍瓶咖啡為研究對象，探討其使用衝刺計畫（Google Sprint）進行網站優化專案之成效，將網站之重新設計視為產品開發。以起源於美國IDEO設計公司之設計思考（Design Thinking）為理論、Google Venture開發之衝刺計畫為實作方式，並以英國設計委員會提出之雙鑽石模型（The Double Diamond）解釋設計思考與衝刺計畫之關係，探討以設計思考之流程分析藍瓶咖啡衝刺計畫，從而驗證其有效性。
本研究經由上述方式，分析設計思考與衝刺計畫皆符合雙鑽石模型之思維流程，認為兩者有高度相關性；且分析導入衝刺計畫之個案公司藍瓶咖啡，在優化之網站上架後，其線上銷售額及顧客於網站停留之時間皆獲得翻倍成長，並於隔年收購了一家咖啡訂購公司，提升之商業價值顯著；並以設計思考之流程為構面，拆解組合衝刺計畫之步驟，分析導入衝刺計畫而達成有效創新之藍瓶咖啡個案，得以間接驗證設計思維於產品開發之有效性。
The trend of technology development and industry transformation and upgrading prevails in recent years. Given this condition, “innovation” has gradually becoming popular and more valued as one of the important factors of improving competitive advantage of business. Among numerous approaches of innovation, this study started from design perspective and discussed how the design mindset can be applied to the process of product development.
Taking re-design of a website as product development, this study focused on the website improvement project of Blue Bottle Coffee from San Francisco Bay Area applying Google Sprint as research object. Taking Design Thinking from IDEO as theory and Google Sprint from Google Venture as practice approach, this study applied The Double Diamond from Design Council to interpret the correlation between Design Thinking and Google Sprint and confirmed the effectiveness of design mindset by analyzing the Google Sprint progress of Blue Bottle Coffee with Design Thinking process.
This study analyzed the high correlation of Design Thinking and Google Sprint by The Double Diamond through the approach above since the steps of Google Sprint could be disassembled and reassembled by Design Thinking process. The effectiveness of design mindset in product development could be confirmed by discussing the successful innovation case of Blue Bottle Coffee applying Google Sprint. |
| Reference: | 1.Producer, John Biffar, & Director, John Biffar. 1999. Uncommon Friends of the 20th Century. United States: Bush Entertainment Inc.
2.Blue Bottle Coffee. Our Story [Official Website]. Retrieved from https://bluebottlecoffee.com/our-story
3.Tim Brown. （2008）. Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86（6）, 84-92.
4.Tim Brown（2017年6月）。化創意為競爭力的領導力。哈佛商業評論，130。取自 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0007076.html
5.Business Dictionary. mind mapping. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/mind-mapping.html
6.RIKKE DAM & TEO SIANG （2018）. Empathy Map – Why and How to Use It. Interaction Design Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/empathy-map-why-and-how-to-use-it
7.Design Council （2015, March 17）. The Design Process: What is the Double Diamond? Design Council. Retrieved from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond
8.Design Council （2015, March 18）. Design Methods Step 1: Discover Design Council. Retrieved from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-methods-step-1-discover
9.Design Council （2005）. Eleven lessons- Managing design in eleven global brands: A Study of the design process. Design Council. Retrieved from http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/ElevenLessons_Design_Council%20%282%29.pdf
10.Design Council （2015, March 18）. Design Methods Step 2: Define Design Council. Retrieved from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-methods-step-2-define
11.Design Council （2015, March 18）. Design Methods Step 3: Develop Design Council. Retrieved from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-methods-step-3-develop
12.Design Council （2015, March 18）. Design Methods Step 4: Deliver Design Council. Retrieved from https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-methods-step-4-deliver
13.Design Sprint School. （2017, June 1）. Blue Bottle Sprint Story [Design Sprint School Enrollment]. Retrieved from https://design-sprint-school1.teachable.com/courses/welcome/lectures/2624457
14.Sarah Gibbons （2018, January 14）. Empathy Mapping: The First Step in Design Thinking. Nielsen Norman Group. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/empathy-mapping/
15.GV. （2015, November 26）. Case study: Blue Bottle sprints with GV [Web blog]. Retrieved from https://sprintstories.com/case-study-blue-bottle-sprints-with-gv-f452789b8ecd
16.Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford. Design Thinking Bootcamp Bootleg. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57c6b79629687fde090a0fdd/t/58890239db29d6cc6c3338f7/1485374014340/METHODCARDS-v3-slim.pdf
17.IDEO. Nurturing a Creative Culture [Official Website]. Retrieved from https://www.ideo.com/case-study/nurturing-a-creative-culture
18.Jake Knapp & John Zeratsky & Braden Kowitz. （2016, December 27）. INSIDE BLUE BOTTLE COFFEE’S SPRINT TO GET OFF THE GROUND [Online forum]. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2016/12/inside-blue-bottle-coffees-sprint-to-get-off-the-ground/
19.Kent Larson（2016年2月）。打造創新生態的祕訣。哈佛商業評論，114。取自 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0003398.html
20.Kimbell, L. （2011）. Designing for service as one way of designing services. International Journal of Design, 5（2）, 41-52.
21.Mary-Anne Mace. （1998）. Modelling The Creative Process: A Grounded Theory Analysis Of Creativity In The Domain Of Art Making.（Doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury）. Retrieved from https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10092/4577/mace_thesis.pdf?sequence=1
22.Art Markman（2017年6月19日）。你的團隊搞錯腦力激盪了。哈佛商業評論。取自 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0007174.html
23.Roger L. Martin, （2007）. The Opposable Mind: How Successful Leaders Win Through Integrative Thinking. Brighton, Massachusetts, United States: Harvard Business Press
24.Jakob Nielsen & Thomas K. Landauer. （1993）. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. Proceedings of the INTERACT `93 and CHI `93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 206-213. doi:10.1145/169059.169166
25.TCHO Chocolate. Unwrap our chocolate down to the roots [Official Website]. Retrieved from https://tcho.com/pages/explore
26.Harrison Weber. （2013, July 11）. This is what happens when Google Ventures’ design team helps redesign a startup’s site [Online Forum]. Retrieved from https://thenextweb.com/dd/2013/07/10/this-is-what-happens-when-google-ventures-design-team-helps-redesign-a-startups-site/
27.John Zeratsky. （2013, July 11）. Behind the scenes with Blue Bottle and GV [Web blog]. Retrieved from https://library.gv.com/behind-the-scenes-with-blue-bottle-and-gv-bbd7e26e9276
28.工業技術研究院（2014年12月）。台灣電子產業回顧與展望。取自 https://www.itri.org.tw/chi/Content/NewsLetter/Contents.aspx?SiteID=1&MmmID=5000&MSid=621302513530161363
29.王家英（2008年6月）。小脫軌才能大創新。哈佛商業評論，86。取自 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0000738.html
30.司徒達賢（2010，8，15）。流程太重要了。工商時報。取自http://prof-seetoo.blogspot.tw/2010/12/blog-post_5864.html
31.池熙璿（譯）（2013）。這就是服務設計思考！（原作者：MARC STICKDORN & JAKOB SCHNEIDER）。新北市：中國生產力中心。（原著出版年：2011）
32.李田樹（譯）（2005）。責任與擔當：杜拉克談專業經理人（原作者：Peter Ferdinand Drucker）。臺北市：天下文化。（原著出版年：1998）
33.吳士宏（2017，11，30）。台灣產業創新的非理性障礙。工商時報。取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20171130000083-260202
34.吳莉君（譯）（2010）。設計思考改造世界（原作者：Tim Brown）。新北市：聯經出版公司。（原著出版年：2009）
35.卓致遠（2017 年 2 月）。設計思考怎麼改變世界？。INSIDE 硬塞的網路趨勢觀察。取自 https://www.inside.com.tw/2017/02/28/how-does-design-thinking-change-world
36.哈佛商業評論（2014年8月11日）。在框框內思考【線上影音資料】。取自 https://www.hbrtaiwan.com/article_content_AR0006563.html
37.孫易新（2015）。案例解析！超高效心智圖法入門：輕鬆學會用心智圖作學習筆記、工作管理、提升記憶和創意發想。臺北市：商周出版。
38.許瑞宋（譯）（2016）。Google 創投認證！Sprint 衝刺計畫──Google 最實用工作法，5天5步驟迅速解決難題、測試新點子、完成更多工作！（原作者：Jake Knapp & John Zeratsky & Braden Kowitz）。臺北市：時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。（原著出版年：2016）
39.張曉蕊（2009年6月）。腦力激盪4原則、7步驟，捕抓好點子。經理人月刊，55。取自 https://www.nownews.com/news/20090607/927476
40.國際商業機器股份有限公司（2006）。中國信託銀行攜手 IBM 採用設計思考思維 以使用者為中心 打造未來金融服務。取自 https://www.ibm.com/news/tw/zh/2016/06/07/M012065S17538C41.html
41.臺灣大學創新設計學院。ROOKIE`S GUIDE. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0sbkZN71AsGSnhUVVNFUjRQNDg/view
42.蕭富峰、李田樹（譯）（2002）。創新與創業精神（原作者：Peter Ferdinand Drucker）。臺北市：臉譜出版。（原著出版年：1985）
43.蕭雲菁（譯）（2007）。心智圖練習簿（原作者：片岡俊行）。臺北市：晨星出版。（原著出版年：2006）
44.齊若蘭（譯）（2004）。彼得‧杜拉克的管理聖經（原作者：Peter Ferdinand Drucker）。臺北市：遠流出版公司。（原著出版年：1954）
45.劉庭安（2017年5月）。台灣經濟大敗局：1990年後到底發生了什麼事？。換日線 Crossing。取自 https://crossing.cw.com.tw/blogTopic.action?id=732&nid=8010 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
105363114 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105363114 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/THE.NCCU.MBA.016.2018.F08 |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 311401.pdf | | 2077Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 5 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
