English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 80610/109881 (73%)
造訪人次 : 20800872      線上人數 : 576
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118635


    題名: Dialogue and Bargain: Mapping the International Human Rights Law to Understand the Implementation of Universal Human Rights Conventions in Taiwan
    對話與爭議:從國際人權法圖像論臺灣施行人權公約之實質意涵
    作者: 翁燕菁
    Weng, Vivianne Yen-Ching
    貢獻者: 政治系
    關鍵詞: 國際人權公約;司法對話;普世與相對;國家條約施行;臺灣實踐
    International human rights treaties;judicial dialogue;universal and relative;national implementation of treaty;Taiwan practices
    日期: 2017-11
    上傳時間: 2018-07-12 17:31:40 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 臺灣陸續施行聯合國核心人權公約,兩最高院原則上亦接受其內國法效力,惟就其直接適用仍多有疑慮。本文以相關機制發展較為成熟之歐洲為例,闡釋國際人權法之動態圖像。各國獨立金字塔結構之法秩序,已無法解釋今日人權法之運作。普世價值只是諸多相對價值折衝之暫時結論,無礙其變遷與相對化;而相對價值已多方為普世滲透,惟藉由對話及爭議試圖重新自我定位。此動態之下,施行人權公約非關消極接受國際解釋,而係積極之「交易」或「議價」,在達成最新共識之前,遊走於合意與抗辯之間,構成「有序的多元」。臺灣欠缺司法審查由下而上形成共識之機制,惟其所本之集中司法審查之原型國家,法院合公約性審查已行之有年。本文以法國為例,說明法院如何與內國機關以及國際監督機制建立以人權為中心之對話地圖,包括體現國家重要價值決定以及捍衛特殊歷史制度。臺灣的21世紀國際自我定位,繫於法治人權。欲賦與施行國際人權公約實質意涵,藉由臺灣在地國家報告審查機制,現階段適足以允許臺灣參與普世人權內涵之形成,亦允許臺灣司法積極參與在地價值之確立。落實憲政人權,關鍵在於司法實踐中的權利論述,而非形式上的人權清單。
    United Nations core human rights treaties are successively implemented in Taiwan. While their effect within the national legal order has been accepted, in principle, by both supreme courts, their direct application in individual cases is still pending. However, a legal order based on independent pyramid hierarchy can no longer explain the contemporary functioning of human rights law. This paper aims at drawing and interpreting the dynamic map of international human rights law, using the example of Europe where the mechanisms are relatively developed. On the one hand, the universal values are merely temporary conclusion drawn from conflicting views, without being frozen in time or fixed in space. On the other hand, the relative views are being penetrated by the universal values and being renewed through dialogue and bargain process. Implement human rights treaties consists of active dialogue and bargaining. Before a consensus can be reached, there are disputes and fragments around a same concept, constituting an "orderly plurality". Implementation of human rights treaties creates a chance for Taiwan to develop its bottom-up consensus-building along with its yet monopolized judicial review. The experiences of France can well demonstrate how the conventionality review has contributed to a dialogue on human rights between different national and international institutions. On this map of dialogue, national courts do not have to sacrifice crucial national principles or specificity based on historical factors. Taiwan can hardly find a place in the international community, but its rapid evolution in rule of law and human rights protection can well position it there, for judges are the most "internationalizable" power. The future of human rights treaties resides in national practices, and Taiwan should effectively participate in the shaping of universal human rights norms. It is not a constitutionalized list of rights nor a real accession to a treaty that matters, but a judicial power involved in this dialogue map does.
    關聯: 臺大法學論叢, Vol.46, No.特刊, pp.1115-1201
    資料類型: article
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2017.46.SP.02
    顯示於類別:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML6檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋