English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46099820      Online Users : 733
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118641


    Title: 比特幣與金融資產之關聯性探討
    Study of the relationships between bitcoin and financial assets
    Authors: 許允禎
    Hsu, Yun-Chen
    Contributors: 林柏生
    許允禎
    Hsu, Yun-Chen
    Keywords: 比特幣價格
    資產組合平衡模型
    自向量迴歸模型
    Bitcoin
    Portfolio balance model
    VAR
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-07-13 15:10:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,加密貨幣及區塊鏈的技術已在全球掀起熱潮,比特幣價格不斷創
    新高,吸引越來越多人投入比特幣的買賣,讓比特幣成為一種新興的投資管道。根據資產組合平衡模型(Portfolio balance approach)所提出,當資產持有者改變其資產組合時,會造成匯率變動。因此,本文試圖探討,當比特幣成為投資的選項之一,是否能利用資產組合平衡模型來解釋外匯市場、債券市場、股票市場及商品市場與加密貨幣市場間的關係。本文利用單根檢定、建立 VAR 模型、Granger因果關係檢定及衝擊反應分析,研究變數間的動態關係。 相較於產組合平衡模型的實證研究中,多以各國匯率作為因變數,貨幣供給量、債券持有量、國外資產持有量做為自變數;本文則是把比特幣價格作為因變數,選取 2015 年 8 月 10 日到 2018 年 3 月 29 日之日資料,自變數中包含黃金現貨價格、美元指數、道瓊工業指數、S&P500 指數、10 年期美國公債殖利率及5年期美國公債殖利率。結果顯示出,僅有債券市場具有預測比特幣價格的能力,結果未能符合產組合平衡模型(Portfolio balance approach)之理論。由於比特幣無法作為購買金融資產的交易媒介,傳統的金融資產,如債券、股票及黃金,仍需要透過傳統法幣當媒介,才能在資產間轉換,引發匯率的變動。
    Bitcoin price is soaring recent years and more and more people start to wonder what is bitcoin. Some researches discuss about the nature of bitcoin whether it is a
    real currency or speculative assets. Most of empirical researches suggest that bitcoin is a speculative asset rather than a real currency. Under the premise, this research is trying to use “portfolio balance approach” to explain the relationships between bitcoin and financial assets. We chose USD/BTC as dependent variable and US dollar index, S&P 500 Index, Dow Jones Index, gold price, United States 10-year bond yield and United States 5-year bond yield as independent variables. Then, we use vector
    autoregression model, granger causality test and impulse response analysis to find out the results. The results of this research shows that only United States 10-year bond yield and United States 5-year bond yield could forecast the volatility of bitcoin price. Therefore, the results don’t meet the theory of portfolio balance approach. We
    speculate that because we use the price and index of the financial assets as proxy to replace the holding amount, by some restricts of the data .On the other hand, the volatility of bitcoin price is also probably influenced by internal factor which is driven by buyers and sellers rather than fundamental economic factors.
    Reference: 英文部分
    Ahmed, H., Hallwood, P. C., & Miller, S. M. (1997), Monetary Policy in a Portfolio Balance Model with Endogenous Physical Capital.
    Baek, C., & Elbeck, M. (2015), Bitcoins as an investment or speculative vehicle? A first look. Applied Economics Letters, 22(1), 30-34.
    Bouoiyour, J., & Selmi, R. (2015), What does Bitcoin look like? Annals of Economics & Finance, 16(2).
    Bouoiyour, J., Selmi, R., Tiwari, A. K., & Olayeni, O. R. (2016), What drives Bitcoin price. Economics Bulletin, 36(2), 843-850.
    Branson, W. H., Halttunen, H., & Masson, P. (1977), Exchange rates in the short run:The dollar-dentschemark rate. European Economic Review, 10(3), 303-324.
    Branson, W. H., Halttunen, H., & Masson, P. (1979), Exchange rates in the short run:Some further results. European Economic Review, 12(4), 395-402.
    Caprio, J., & Clark, P. B. (1983), Oil price shocks in a portfolio-balance model.
    Journal of Economics and Business, 35(2), 221-233.
    Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., & Kancs, d. A. (2016), The economics of BitCoin price
    formation. Applied Economics, 48(19), 1799-1815.
    Cushman, D. O. (2007), A portfolio balance approach to the Canadian–US exchange rate. Review of Financial Economics, 16(3), 305-320.
    Dooley, M. P., & Isard, P. (1983), The portfolio-balance model of exchange rates and some structural estimates of the risk premium. Staff Papers, 30(4), 683-702.
    Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016), Hedging capabilities of bitcoin. Is it the virtual gold? Finance Research Letters, 16, 139-144.
    Frankel, J. A. (1992), Monetary and portfolio-balance models of exchange rate determination International Economic Policies and their Theoretical Foundations
    (Second Edition) (pp. 793-832): Elsevier.
    Gandal, N., & Halaburda, H. (2016), Can we predict the winner in a market with network effects? Competition in cryptocurrency market. Games, 7(3), 16.
    Glaser, F., Zimmermann, K., Haferkorn, M., Weber, M., & Siering, M. (2014). Bitcoin-asset or currency? revealing users` hidden intentions.
    Hur, Y., Jeon, S., & Yoo, B. (2015), Is Bitcoin a Viable E-Business?: Empirical Analysis of the Digital Currency’s Speculative Nature.
    Kristoufek, L. (2013), BitCoin meets Google Trends and Wikipedia: Quantifying the relationship between phenomena of the Internet era. Scientific reports, 3, 3415. Klabbers, S. (2017), Bitcoin as an investment asset: The added value of bitcoin in a global market portfolio. Poyser, O. (2017), Exploring the determinants of Bitcoin`s price: an application of Bayesian Structural Time Series. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.01437.
    Sovbetov, Y. (2018), Factors influencing cryptocurrency prices: Evidence from bitcoin, ethereum, dash, litcoin, and monero.
    van Wijk, D. (2013), What can be expected from the BitCoin. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
    Yardeni, E. E. (1978), A Portfolio—Balance Model of Corporate Working Capital. The Journal of Finance, 33(2), 535-552.
    Yelowitz, A., & Wilson, M. (2015), Characteristics of Bitcoin users: an analysis of
    Google search data. Applied Economics Letters, 22(13), 1030-1036.
    Yermack, D. (2015), Is Bitcoin a real currency? An economic appraisal Handbook of digital currency (pp. 31-43): Elsevier.

    中文部分
    李榮謙、方 耀(2001)。「電子支付系統與電子貨幣:發展、影響及適當的管理架構」,中央銀行季刊第二十三卷第三期。
    陳旭昇(2007)。時間序列分析─ 總體經濟與財務金融之應用,東華書局,初版。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易學系
    105351029
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105351029
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IB.013.2018.F06
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback