English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 82598/111709 (74%)
造訪人次 : 21488490      線上人數 : 485
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/119132
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119132


    題名: 多因子選股策略之建構——以臺灣股市為實證
    Constructing a Multi-factor Investing Strategy – An Empirical Study in Taiwan Stock market
    作者: 余羚華
    Yu, Ling-Hua
    貢獻者: 李志宏
    Lee, Jie-Haun
    余羚華
    Yu, Ling-Hua
    關鍵詞: 多因子投資
    規模
    帳市值比
    獲利性
    公司治理
    流動性
    資產成長
    Multifactor investing
    Size
    Book to market ratio
    Profitability
    Corporate governance
    Liquidity
    Asset growth
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-08-01 16:22:09 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在本研究中檢視了六個因子──公司規模、帳市值比、獲利性、公司治理程度、股票流動性及公司資產成長,以2000年至2017年之台灣股市進行實證,觀察其是否能運用在台灣的股票市場中,作為有效的選股因子,為投資人創造潛在的超額報酬。並逐步將各因子做結合,以多因子模式進行選股投資,同時檢視不同的多因子選股方式是否能更有效創造出好的投資績效。
    實證結果發現,在台灣的股票市場中,以公司規模、帳市值比、獲利性、公司治理程度、股票流動性因子等五個因子進行投資,都能透過買進持有策略獲得顯著且持續的超額報酬。將所選取的因子進行整合後,本研究發現結合多因子之投資模式,能利用多個因子的效果,並透過因子間的交互作用降低風險,創造出比單一因子之投資策略更佳的表現。其中,將規模、帳市值比、獲利性、公司治理以及流動性都同時綜合考量的五因子組合,能透過針對「物美價廉的冷門小型股」進行投資獲得最好的投資績效。而隨著投資期間越長,五因子組合越能將投資組合的風險降至與市場風險相當的水平,能有較佳的績效表現。然而因子數並非越多越好,選擇因子時除了考量是否能有效帶來超額報酬,是否能降低投資組合的風險,也是建構多因子組合所需要考量的重點之一。此外,以提升有效因子之權重的方式進行多因子選股,能夠創造更好的績效表現。本研究中增加了有效因子的權重,發現到能藉此進一步的提升多因子選股的表現。
    In this study, we examined six factors—size, book to market ratio, profitability, corporate governance, stock liquidity, and asset growth. We used the data of Taiwan stock market from 2000 to 2017, to examine whether these factors can serve as effective stock selection factors in Taiwan stock market, and bring potential excess returns for investors. we also combined the factors to conduct multi-factor investments, and compared the performance of different process of multi-factor stock selection.
    The empirical results show that while investing in Taiwan stock market through long-only strategy, selecting stocks by size, book to market ratio, profitability, corporate governance, and stock liquidity could continuously earn significant excess return. We also combined the factors selected, and found that multi-factor investments performed better than single-factor investment. It could not only take advantage of the effects of the single factor, but also reduce the portfolio risk. Among them, the five-factor investment which combined size, book to market ratio, profitability, corporate governance, and liquidity could have the best performance. As the investment period became longer, the five-factor investment could perform better by reducing the risk to the level close to the market. However, more factors do not guarantee better portfolio performance. Not only the effectiveness but the correlation between the factors should be considered. In addition, increasing the weight of effective factor could increase the excess return. In this study, we increase the weight of effective factors, and found that the portfolio performs better.
    參考文獻: 一、 英文文獻
    Ammann, M., Odoni, S., & Oesch, D. (2012). An alternative three-factor model for international markets- Evidence from the European monetary union. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(7), 1857-1864.
    Ang, A. (2014). Asset management: A systematic approach to factor investing. Oxford University Press.
    Arshanapalli, B., Daniel Coggin, T., & Doukas, J. (1998). Multifactor asset pricing analysis of international value investment strategies. Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(4), 10-23.
    Asgharian, H., & Hansson, B. (2010). Book-to-market and size effects: compensations for risks or outcomes of market inefficiencies?. The European Journal of Finance, 16(2), 119-136.
    Bacon, J. (1973), Corporate Directorship Practices: Membership and Committees of The Board, New York: The Conference Board.
    Baik, B., Kang, J. K., & Kim, J. M. (2010). Local institutional investors, information asymmetries, and equity returns. Journal of financial economics, 97(1), 81-106.
    Ball, R., Gerakos, J., Linnainmaa, J. T., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2015). Deflating profitability. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(2), 225-248.
    Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of financial economics, 9(1), 3-18.
    Bauman, W. S., & Miller, R. E. (1997). Investor expectations and the performance of value stocks versus growth stocks. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 23(3), 57-68.
    Berk, J. B., Green, R. C., & Naik, V. (1999). Optimal investment, growth options, and security returns. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1553-1607.
    Black, B. (2001). The corporate governance behavior and market value of Russian firms. Emerging markets review, 2(2), 89-108.
    Blitz, David C. (2012). Strategic Allocation to Premiums in the Equity Market. Journal of Index Investing, 2(4): 42–49.
    Capaul, C., Rowley, I., & Sharpe, W. F. (1993). International value and growth stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(1), 27-36.
    Chan, K. C., & Chen, N. F. (1991). Structural and return characteristics of small and large firms. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1467-1484.
    Chen, L., & Zhang, L. (2010). A better three-factor model that explains more anomalies. Journal of Finance, 65(2), 563-595.
    Chui, A. C., & Wei, K. J. (1998). Book-to-market, firm size, and the turn-of-the-year effect: Evidence from Pacific-Basin emerging markets. Pacific-Basin finance journal, 6(3-4), 275-293.
    Cochrane, J. H. (1991). Production‐based asset pricing and the link between stock returns and economic fluctuations. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 209-237.
    Cooper, M. J.,Gulen, H.,Schill, M. J.(2008).Asset Growth and the Cross-section of Stock Returns.Journal of Finance,63(4),1609-1651.
    Daniel, K., S. Titman. 1997. Evidence on the characteristics of cross-sectional variation in stock returns. Journal of Finance 52(1):1-33.
    Datar, V. T., Naik, N. Y., & Radcliffe, R. (1998). Liquidity and stock returns: An alternative test. Journal of Financial Markets, 1(2), 203-219.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. the Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2006). Profitability, investment and average returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 491-518.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2015), International Tests of “A Five-Factor Asset Pricing Model”, Journal of Finance Economics, 116, 1-22.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2016). Dissecting anomalies with a five-factor model. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(1), 69-103.
    Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2017). International tests of a five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of financial Economics, 123(3), 441-463.
    Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate governance and equity prices. The quarterly journal of economics, 118(1), 107-156.
    Gray, P., & Johnson, J. (2011). The relationship between asset growth and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(3), 670-680.
    Haugen, R. A., & Baker, N. L. (1996). Commonality in the determinants of expected stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(3), 401-439.
    Hou, K., Xue, C., & Zhang, L. (2015). Digesting anomalies- An investment approach. The Review of Financial Studies, 28(3), 650-705.
    Houweling, P., & Van Zundert, J. (2017). Factor investing in the corporate bond market. Financial Analysts Journal, 73(2), 100-115.
    Ilmanen, A. (2011). Expected returns: An investor's guide to harvesting market rewards. John Wiley & Sons.
    Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
    Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189-205.
    Koedijk, K. G., Slager, A. M., & Stork, P. A. (2016). Investing in systematic factor premiums. European Financial Management, 22(2), 193-234.
    Lakonishok, Josef, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert W. Vishny. (1994). Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk. Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541–1578.
    Li, X., Becker, Y., & Rosenfeld, D. (2012). Asset growth and future stock returns- International evidence. Financial Analysts Journal, 68(3), 51-62.
    Li, E. X., Livdan, D., & Zhang, L. (2009). Anomalies. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(11), 4301-4334.
    Li, X., & Sullivan, R. N. (2011). The limits to arbitrage revisited: The accrual and asset growth anomalies. Financial Analysts Journal, 67(4), 50-66.
    Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The business lawyer, 59-77.
    McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial economics, 27(2), 595-612.
    Novy-Marx, R. (2013). The other side of value- The gross profitability premium. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(1), 1-28.
    Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of financial economics, 20, 237-265.
    Reinganum, M. R. (1981). Misspecification of capital asset pricing- Empirical anomalies based on earnings' yields and market values. Journal of financial Economics, 9(1), 19-46.
    Rosenberg, B., & Reid, K. R. Lanstein (1985). Persuasive Evidence of Market Inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management, Spring, 9-16.
    Singh, M. and W.N. Davidson, 2003. Agency cost, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking and Finance 27: 793-816.
    Skinner, D., R. Sloan. 2002. Earnings surprises、growth expectations and stock returns or dent let an earnings torpedo sink your portfolio. Review of Accounting Studies 7(2):289-312.
    Titman, S., Wei, K. J., & Xie, F. (2013). Market development and the asset growth effect- International evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(5), 1405-1432.
    Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of money, credit and banking, 1(1), 15-29.
    Watanabe, A., Xu, Y., Yao, T., & Yu, T. (2013). The asset growth effect- Insights from international equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 529-563.
    Yan, X., & Zhang, Z. (2007). Institutional investors and equity returns- Are short-term institutions better informed?. The review of financial studies, 22(2), 893-924.
    Yao, T., Yu, T., Zhang, T., & Chen, S. (2011). Asset growth and stock returns- Evidence from Asian financial markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 19(1), 115-139.
    Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics, 40(2), 185-211.
    Yoshikawa, H. (1980). On the" q" Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, 70(4), 739-743.
    Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, Vol. 15, No.2, 291-334.


    二、 中文文獻
    王玉珍(2002)。股權結構、董事會組成、資本結構與企業績效關係之研究,中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    李春旺、劉維琪、高孔廉(1989)。股價行為與規模效應: 臺灣股票市場實證研究,管理評論, 8, 99-121。
    李命志、林苑宜 (2000)。臺灣股市規模效應與淨值市價比效應實證研究,台灣經濟金融月刊,9 月, 88 -98頁。
    何里仁(2003)。公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究,私立逢甲大學會計與財稅所碩士論文。
    沈立平(2003)。台灣上市公司股權結構、財務決策與公司價值之關聯性研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林建廷(2001)。台灣股票市場因子探討,國立東華大學國際經濟研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳璟昇(1997)。價值型與成長型股票投資績效之研究—以台灣股票市場為例, 國立政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
    胡星陽(1998)。流動性對台灣股票報酬率的影響,中國財務學刊, 5(4), 1-19。
    陳榮昌(2002)。台灣股票報酬之結構分析。國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
    張亮勳(2007)。中國大陸公司治理與股票報酬之關係,政治大學會計研究所學位論文。
    張瑋琍(2011)。價廉物美的投資策略,臺灣大學國際企業學研究所學位論文。
    蔡劼麟(1999)。台灣股票市場價格動量與周轉率之週期循環研究。銘傳大學金融研究所碩士論文。
    劉秉龍(2002)。成長型與價值型投資策略之實證分析-以台灣股票市場為例,私立靜宜大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    劉漢儒(2016)。選股策略之有效性—以航運業為例,國立中央大學財務金融研究所未出版之碩士論文。
    鄭筱凡(2001)。全球股權結構與經營績效之研究,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    1053570191
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1053570191
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.Finance.020.2018.F07
    顯示於類別:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    019101.pdf1528KbAdobe PDF0檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋