English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91280/121421 (75%)
Visitors : 25396008      Online Users : 87
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119139


    Title: 1998-2017年圖書資訊學遠距教育研究及發展演變
    Study on Distance Education in Library and Information Science Research and Development, 1998-2017
    Authors: 徐柔瑾
    Hsu, Jou-Chin
    Contributors: 王梅玲
    Wang, Mei-Ling
    徐柔瑾
    Hsu, Jou-Chin
    Keywords: 圖書資訊學
    遠距教育
    數位學習
    資訊計量學
    布萊德福定律
    洛卡定律
    Library and information science
    Distance education
    eLearning
    Informetrics
    Bradford's law
    Loka's law
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-08-01 16:35:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在應用資訊計量學方法分析1998年至2017年間,圖書資訊學遠距教育文獻之特性、期刊特性以及作者生產力。研究樣本取自LISA與SSCI兩個資料庫,共計2,416筆期刊文獻。期望本研究結果能夠提供圖書資訊學遠距教育未來研究方向之參考,並且提供圖書館未來發展與服務方向。
    本研究研究結果歸納如下:(1)圖書資訊學遠距教育文獻成長曲線較接近線性成長。(2)圖書資訊學遠距教育文獻主要出版國家為美國、英國、荷蘭、加拿大、德國等國。(3)圖書資訊學遠距教育文獻出版語言以英文為多數。(4)圖書資訊學遠距教育主題分布前三名分別為圖書館與遠距教育、遠距教育課程與內容、教學技術與課程傳遞。(5)本研究期刊分布符合布萊德福定律,求得之核心期刊有七種。(6)美國與英國皆為核心期刊與高被引期刊的主要出版國家。(7)高被引文獻多分布於前十年且以共同合著作居多。(8)單一與共同合著作者發展情形,已於近十年開始朝共同作者發展。(9)第一作者法與平等法經K-S檢定仍滿足洛卡定律。(10)作者服務機構與機構國家皆以美國居首位,也是發表學術研究成果最多的國家。(11)英國是最具有吸引他國學術研究成果的國家。(12)亞洲地區圖書資訊學遠距教育研究以臺灣、印度,以及中國表現良好。
    本研究最後依據研究發展現之結果,提出以下建議:(1)鑑於促進國際學術研究交流,建議文獻研究人員,發表時增加長篇英語摘要。(2)遠距教育課程與內容、教學技術與課程傳遞兩個主題已經開始成為圖書資訊學遠距教育學術研究焦點,未來兩個主題皆應有更深入且多樣的研究。(3)我國是亞洲圖書資訊學遠距教育研究表現第一名,未來可加強此特色之研究。
    The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of the literature of distance education in library and information science, the characteristics of periodicals and the author's productivity by using the method of informetrics from 1998 to 2017. A total of 2,416 bibliographic data were retrieved from LISA and SSCI databases. It is expected that the results of this study can provide a reference for the future research of distance learning in library and information science and can also provide direction for future development and service of library.
    The results of the present study are as follows: (1) The growth pattern of distance education in library and information science literature is relatively close to linear growth. (2) United States, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Canada and Germany are five major countries of distance education in library and information science publications. (3) English is the most often used language. (4) The top three subjects of distance education in library and information science are library and distance education, courses and content, instructional technology and course delivery. (5) The distribution of the journal articles fits Bradford’s Law, and there are seven core journals. (6) Both the United States and the United Kingdom are major publishers of core journals and highly cited journals. (7) High citations are mostly distributed in the previous decade and are mostly co-authored. (8) The development of single and co-authors has begun to grow toward co-authors in the last decade. (9) The first author law and the equality law still satisfy Loka's Law by KS-test. (10) United States ranks first in author service institutions and countries, and it produces the most academic research publications. (11) Researchers in other countries prefer publishing their work in the journals mostly from the United Kingdom. (12) Taiwan, India, and China perform very well in the study of distance education in library and information science in Asia.
    According to the results of the research and development, the following suggestions are proposed: (1) In view of promoting international academic exchanges, long English summary of the publication is recommended to increase by literature researchers. (2) The two subjects of courses and content, instructional technology and course delivery have become the focus of academic research on distance education of library and information science. The two subjects should gain more in-depth and diverse research breakthroughs in the future. (3) Taiwan ranks first in Asian study in library and information science, and the characteristics of education research distance performance can be strengthened in the future.
    Reference: Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G.(2002)。遠距教育:系統觀(趙美聲、陳姚真譯)。高雄市:麗文文化。(原著出版年:1996)
    Simonson, M., Smaldinom, S., & Zvacek, S.(2007)。遠距教學與學習 : 遠距教育的基礎(沈俊毅譯)。臺北市:心理。(原著出版年:2000)
    于第(2011)。運用教育部「圖書資訊應用」通識課程數位學習教材於非同步遠距課程教學設計與教學成效之研究。圖書與資訊學刊,79,12-30。
    方瑀紳、李隆盛(2014)。臺灣數位學習的成效與研究:2000-2011年間國內外研究文獻的回顧與綜整。教育資料與圖書館學,51,27-56。
    王亦勤(2007)。台灣地區學術生產力之研究:以12所大學為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所:臺北市。
    王明玲、杜立中、曾彩娥(2009)。臺灣出版五四運動文獻之書目計量研究。國家圖書館館刊,1,93-113。
    王振鵠、胡歐蘭、鄭恒雄、劉春銀(2014)。臺灣圖書館事業百年發展。臺北市:文華圖書館管理。
    王梅玲(2003)。美國圖書資訊學網路教學調查研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,29(1),38-57。
    王梅玲(2005)。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。臺北市,文華圖書館管理。
    王梅玲(2007)。臺灣圖書館學教育史。圖書與資訊學刊,63,47-63。
    王梅玲(2008)。數位學習認證帶給圖書資訊學教育的挑戰。圖書與資訊學刊,65,42-54。
    王梅玲(2013a)。圖書資訊學教育百年發展史。蔡明月(主編),圖書資訊學教育(頁1-36)。臺北市:五南出版。
    王梅玲(2013b)。數位課程教學法模式與應用:「知識組織與資訊取用課程」實例探討。大學圖書館,17(1),1-21。
    王梅玲、張艾琦(2016)。數位學習新發展與圖書館新服務。臺北市立圖書館館訊,33(3),1-27。
    王梅玲、陳巧倫(2009)。品質保證應用在圖書資訊學數位課程發展之行動研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,35(2),53-64。
    王梅玲、謝寶煖(2014)。圖書資訊學導論。臺北市:五南。
    交通大學圖書館(2017)。數位圖書資訊學程-起源。檢自 http://www.lib.nctu.edu.tw/html/categoryid-13/id-34/
    何光國(1994)。文獻計量學導論。臺北市:三民。
    吳建中(1995)。圖書館教育史。檢自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1680182/
    吳美美(2004)。數位學習現況與未來發展。圖書館學與資訊科學,30(2),92-106。
    李家寧(2014)。「女性研究」文獻之書目計量學研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所:臺北市。
    李清福(2012)。數位學習領域文獻計量與主題分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班:臺北市。
    林君諭(2011)。我國2001-2010年數位學習博碩士論文之書目計量分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所:臺北市。
    林信成、洪銘禪(2011)。布萊德福與洛卡定律於Wiki網站計量分析之應用。教育資料與圖書館學,48(3),325-346。
    林偉翔、林雯瑤(2012)。北市醫學雜誌之書目計量分析。北市醫學雜誌,9(1),45-60。
    政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所(2016)。圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班。檢自 http://www.elis.nccu.edu.tw/
    洪明洲(1999)。網路教學。臺北市:華采軟體。
    胡述兆(編)(1995)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北市:漢美。
    胡述兆、吳祖善(1987)。圖書館學導論。臺北市,漢美。
    徐敏珠、楊建民(2006)。我國高等教育之數位學習發展策略分析。教育學刊,26,191-214。
    張迺貞(2010)。數位學習應用於圖書館利用教育-以數位學習教材「圖書資訊應用」為例。大同大學通識教育年報,6,187-204。
    張霄亭(1997)。互動式遠距教學在台灣高等教育的發展。視聽教育雙月刊,39(1),1-6。
    教育部(2017)。臺灣學術網路。檢自https://noc.tanet.edu.tw/
    教育部遠距教學交流暨認證網(2017)。關於本站。檢自 https://ace.moe.edu.tw/about_us/index
    淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系(2014)。數位出版與典藏數位學習碩士在職專班。檢自http://www.dils.tku.edu.tw/dilswordpress/
    陳光華(2006)。大綱洛特卡與學術生產力洛特卡經驗法則的形成。檢自:http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/bitstream/246246/20060927121157585682/1/bm200605.pdf
    陳年興(2005)。全球資訊網整合式學習環境。資訊與教育,64,2-13。
    陳年興、林甘敏(2002)。網路學習之學習行為與學習成效分析。資訊管理學報,8(2),121-133。
    陳志銘(2009)。創新數位學習模式與教學應用。臺北市:文華圖書。
    陳蓬桐(2007)。我國遠距教學政策研究(未出版之碩士論文)。逢甲大學公共政策所:臺中市。
    黃國禎、蘇俊銘、陳年興(2012)。數位學習導論與實務。新北市:博碩文化。
    黃慈(2014)。大專院校遠距教學認證制度與歷年成果。楊鎮華(總編輯),2014大學遠距教學成果專書(頁9-22)。新北市:教育部數位學習認證專案計畫辦公室。
    楊正宏、林燕珍、張俊陽、曾憲雄(2008)。台灣高等教育數位學習現況與展望。數位學習科技期刊,創刊號,1-12。
    資策會教育訓練處講師群(2003)。數位學習最佳指引。臺北市:資策會。
    廖婉如(2009)。我國1998至2007年數位學習期刊論文及其引用文獻分析之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所:臺北市。
    蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市:華泰文化。
    蔡明月、方碧玲(2006)。資訊素養文獻之書目計量研究。教育資料與圖書館學,44(2),133-152。
    蔡明月、董蕙茹(2009)。臺灣地區的世界文學翻譯作品:書目計量分析。圖書館學與資訊科學,35(2),34-53。
    蔡明月、劉瓊芳(2007)。1992-2005資訊計量學研究及其發展演變。圖書與資訊學刊,61,42-56。
    蔡緒浩(2015)。全球數位學習研究趨勢之分析:以1988到2013年SSCI國際期刊資料庫為例。管理資訊計算,4(1),252-262。
    蔣龍杰(2004)。網路教學平台功能評鑑指標之發展與應用:以資策會龍門課站為例(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所,臺北市。
    鄭雍蓁、宋雪芳(2011)。數位課程設計與評析:以「讀者服務」課程為例。檢自http://moodle.lips.tw/~tcasist/activities/2011/20111217/20111217_04.pdf
    鄭寶梅(2003)。網路教學在圖書館之應用:以國家圖書館遠距學園為例。圖書館學與資訊科學,29(1),65-73。
    薛理桂(1993)。圖書館與資訊科學在各國隔空教育之實施與比較研究。空大人文學報,2,195-218。
    顏春煌(2010)。數位學習:觀念.方法.實務.設計與實作。臺北市:碁峯資訊。
    Aberystwyth University. (2017). Distance Learning. Retrieved from https://www.aber.ac.uk/en/imla/distance/
    Allan, B. (2002). E-learning and teaching in library and information services. London: Facet.
    Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class differences: Online education in the United States, 2010. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
    American Library Association. (2017). Directory of Institutions Offering ALA-Accredited Master’s Programs in Library and Information Studies. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/CFApps/lisdir/directory_pdf.cfm
    Association of College and Research Libraries. (2018) .College & Research Libraries. Retrieved from https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl
    Bates, A.W. (Tony). (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. London ; New York: Routledge.
    Beatty, B, & Ulasewicz C. (2006). Faculty Perspectives on Moving from Blackboard to the Moodle Learning Management System. TechTrends, 50(4), 36-45.
    Bozkurt, A., Akgun-Ozbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E. …Aydin, C. H. (2015). Trends in Distance Education Research: A Content Analysis of Journals 2009-2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1), 330-363.
    Chu, H. (2015). Library and Information Science Education in the Digital Age. Advances in Librarianship, 32, 77-111.
    Clarivate Analytics. (2017). Web of Science All Databases Help. Retrieved from http://images.webofknowledge.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/WOKRS5251R3/help/WOK/hp_search.html
    Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The History of Comparative Anatomy. Science Progress, 11(44), 578-596.
    Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (Eds.). (1990). Informertics 89/90. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    Elsevier B.V. (2018). The Journal of Academic Librarianship. Retrieved from https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-academic-librarianship
    Emerald Publishing Limited. (2018). The Electronic Library. Retrieved from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/loi/el
    Finlay, C. S., Sugimoto, C. R., Li, D., & Russell, T. G. (2012). Lis Dissertation Titles and Abstracts (1930–2009): Where Have All The Librar* Gone? Library Quarterly, 82(1), 29–46.
    Frey, B. A., Alman, S. W., Barron, D., and Steffens, A. (2004). Student satisfaction with the online MLIS program at the University of Pittsburgh. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science 45(2), 82–97.
    Gaebel, M. (2013). MOOCs: Massive Open Online Courses. Brussels. Belgium: European University Association.
    Harasim, L. (2000). Shift happens: Online education as a new paradigm in learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 3(1), 41-61.
    Harasim, L. M. (2012). Learning Theory and Online Technologies. New York: Routledge.
    Haythornthwaite, C., & Kazmer, M. M. (Ed.). (2004). Learning, culture, and community in online education: research and practice. New York: P. Lang.
    Heiner, M., Schneckenberg, D., & Wildt, J. (2004). Online pedagogy - Innovative teaching and learning strategies in ICT-environments. Background Paper of the cEVU working group Online Pedagogy.
    Herring, S. D. (2010). Research on Libraries and Distance Education: An Analysis of Articles Published 1999-2009. Journal of Library & Information Services In Distance Learning, 4(3), 137-146.
    Hung, Jui-long. (2012). Trends of e-learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5-16.
    Islam, Md. S., Kunifuji, S., Hayama, T., & Miura, M. (2011). Towards exploring a global scenario of e-learning in library and information science schools. The International Information & Library Review, 43, 15-22.
    John Wiley & Sons. (2018). Customer Support Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/
    Keegan, D. (1990). Foundations of distance education. London ; New York: Routledge.
    Khan, B. H. (1998). Web-Based Instruction (WBI): An Introduction. Educational Media International, 35(2), 63-71.
    Khan, B. H. (2005). Managing E-Learning: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. London: Information Science Publishing.
    King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30-35.
    Kumbhar, R. (2009). Use of E-learning in Library and Information Science Education. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 29(1), 37-41.
    Lee, Y., Driscoll, M. P., & Nelson, D. W. (2006). The past, present, and future of research in distance education: Results of a content analysis. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 2(3), 45-61.
    Marcella, R., and Baxter, G. (2001). Information and library studies on a virtual campus. New Library World 102(1169), 362–371.
    Masood, M. (2004). A ten-year analysis: trends in traditional educational technology literature. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology, 1(2), 73-91.
    Maurer, H., & Khan, M. S. (2010). Research trends in the field of e-learning from 2003 to 2008. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 7(1), 5-18.
    Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: a systems view of online learning. Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
    Morales, M. (1985). Inforamerics and its importance. International Forum of Information Documentation, 10(2), 15-21.
    Nacke, O. (1979). Informetrie: Ein Neur Name fur Eine Neue Disziplin. Nahrichtem Für Dokumentation, 30(6), 212-226.
    Patra, S. K., Bhattacharya, P., & Verma, N. (2006). Bibliometric Study of Literature on Bibliometrics. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 26(1), 27-32.
    Porter, S. (2015). To MOOC or not to MOOC: how can online learning help to build the future of higher education?. Waltham, MA: Chandos Publishing/Elsevier.
    Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
    ProQuest LLC. (2017). Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/lisa
    ProQuest LLC. (2017). ULRICHSWEB -- global serials directory. Retrieved from http://ulrichsweb.serialssolutions.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/
    Pujara, S. M., & Bansode, S. Y. (2014). MOOCs and LIS education: A massive opportunity or challeng. Annals of Library and Information Studies, 61, 74-78.
    Saltzberg, S., & Polysin, S. (1995). Distributed learning on the World Wide Web. Syllabus, 9(1), 10-12.
    Saravanan, G., & Dominic, J. (2014). A ten-year bibliometric analysis of the journal Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology (2003 – 2012). Library Philosophy and Practice, 2014(1).
    Sche, J. Y. C. (2012). The establishment of an e-Learning program for the master of library science degree at Southern Connecticut State University: Case analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing ,6(1-2), 211-223.
    Schlosser, L. A., & Simonson, M. (2006). Distance education: definition and glossary of terms. Greenwich, Conn.: IAP.
    Sharpe, R., Greg, B., & Richard F. (2016). Implementing a university e-learning strategy: levers for change within academic schools. Research in Learning Technology, 14(2), 135-151.
    Simonson, M. (2003). Definition of the field. Quarterly review of distance education, 4(1), 7-8.
    Small, R. V., & Paling, S. (2002). The Evolution of a Distance Learning Program in Library and Information Science: A Follow-up Study. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 43(1), 47-61.
    Smith, B., & Eng, M. (2013). MOOCs: A learning journey. Hybrid Learning and Continuing Education. 6th International Conference. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8038, 244-255.
    Smith, L. C., Lastra, S., & Robins, J. (2001). Teaching Online: Changing Models of Teaching and Learning in LEEP. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 348-363.
    Stephens, M., & Jones, K. M. L. (2014). MOOCs as LIS professional development platforms: Evaluating and refining SJSU’s first not-for-credit MOOC. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 55(4), 345–361.
    Taylor & Francis. (2018). Taylor & Francis Online. Retrieved from https://www-tandfonline-com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/
    Taylor, R. S. (1966). Professional Aspects of Information Science and Technology. Annual review of information science and technology (vol. 1). New York: Interscience Publishers.
    Texas Woman's University. (2017). Programs & Admission Requirements. Retrieved from http://www.twu.edu/slis/programs-admission-requirements/
    Tyler, A. (2001). A survey of distance learning library and information science courses delivered via the Internet. Education for Information. 19(1), 47-59.
    Wang, Mei-ling. (2016). Quality Elements and Innovative Instruction for e-Learning Program on Library and Information Science: A Taiwan Case Study. In Sun, Jian-jun, Zhu, Qing-hua, Khoo, Christopher & Ou, Shi-yan (Eds.), The Asia-Pacific Conference on Library & Information Education & Practice (A-LIEP 2016) (pp. 348-362). Nanjing, China: Nanjing University.
    Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. J CETIS. doi: 10.13140/2.1.5072.8320
    Zawacki-Richter, O., Bäcker, E. M., & Vogt, S. (2009). Review of Distance Education Research (2000 to 2008): Analysis of Research Areas, Methods, and Authorship Patterns. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 21-50.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
    105155003
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105155003
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.LIAS.006.2018.A01
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    01.pdf2144KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback