政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/119266

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work > Theses > Item 140.119/119266

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119266

Title:	優勢觀點處遇模式於未成年子女會面交往服務之實踐 The Practice of Strengths-Based Treatment in Supervised Visitation Program
Authors:	黃葆華 Huang, Pao-Hua
Contributors:	宋麗玉黃葆華 Huang, Pao-Hua
Keywords:	優勢觀點未成年子女會面交往服務復元 Strengths perspective Supervised visitation program Recovery
Date:	2018
Issue Date:	2018-08-07 17:22:50 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討社工員如何運用優勢觀點處遇模式於未成年子女會面交往服務，促進案家復元。本研究以深度訪談法萃取四位社工員有效運用優勢，促進案家復元的實務策略與方法，研究結果如下： 1.秉持優勢信念的社工「看見」案家運用優勢的契機，結合優勢觀點的服務策略，促進案家的復元。 2.運用優點模式的服務策略能帶給會面交往工作正向助益：優勢觀點作為綜融性的處遇模式，社工員在實務上能結合每個原則和工具方法，以多元彈性運用優勢，不僅能符合案家的需求，亦能夠突破現行實務工作者處遇上的困境。 3.促進案家復元的錦囊： (1)促進復元的心態：因為相信才會看見優勢；允許與接納復元的歷程因人而異；在有限的時間內創造精心時刻與高品質的親子互動。 (2)促進復元的策略方法包括：社工具親職知能與技巧，引導以遊戲為媒介，以子女為中心的會面；即時介入避免衝突，反映情境與正向回饋修復關係；重新架構為優勢言語，增強案家權能，適時以他人的經驗激發動機；讓案家看見例外經驗，善用節慶祝福的力量促進改變；以案家的需求及預備未來的會面引發想望；以家族事件為契機，多元溝通管道為媒介，傳遞正向溝通技巧，分享彼此的優勢，促進案家成為友善父母。最後，研究者依據本研究之結果提出本研究的限制與建議。 Abstract The study aimed to explore the use of strengths-based case management (SBCM) by social workers in Supervised Visitation Program for the recovery of service users. The researcher used in-depth qualitative interviews record from four social workers as the analysis contents, analyzed their practical strategies and methods on improving the recovery of service users. The study findings are summarized as follows: 1.The strengths-based social workers can discover the opportunity of using SBCM and combine the service strategy of SBCM to improve the recovery of service users. 2.Using strengths perspective as the strategy of intervention brings forth positive advantages to the Supervised Visitation Program: Strengths perspective could be used as a basis and combine every principle and method flexibly with other methods in order to meet the needs of different service user. Moreover, it breaks through the predicament of the practical work. 3.The results indicated that in order to improve the recovery of service users, social workers must build a facilitating mindset: (1) Social workers must believe every service user has its strengths; the progress of recovery is different for each individual; social workers must strive to create quality time and high-quality parent-child interaction in limited time. (2) This study found that the keys to improve the recovery of service users were: facilitate parenting knowledge and skills and create a children-centered visitation by playing games; intervene in any possible dispute in time and provide positive feedbacks to recover relationships; reestablish strengths-based words and facilitate the power of service users; take advantage of the needs of service users to create their expectation; take family events as an opportunity to enhance positive communication skills and to point out each other’s strengths; help service users to become friendly parents. Finally, this study lists out the limitations of the study, and provide strategic suggestions on the work development in the future.
Reference:	中文部分：王佳煌、潘中道、蘇文賢、江吟梓（譯）（2014）。當代社會研究法：質化與量化取向（原作者：Neuman, W. L.）。台北市：學富文化事業有限公司。（原著出版年：2011）王雲東（2012）社會研究方法-量化與質性取向及其應用，新北市：威仕曼文化事業股份有限公司。江淑琳（譯）（2002）。後離婚的家庭。（原作者：Ross A. T. & Paul R. A.）。新北市：韋伯文化事業出版社。（原著出版年：1993）宋麗玉（2005）。精神障礙者之復健與復元—一個積極正向的觀點。中華心理衛生學刊，18(4)，1-29。宋麗玉、施教裕（2009）。優勢觀點－社會工作理論與實務。台北市：洪葉。宋麗玉、施教裕（2010）。復元與優勢觀點之理論內涵與實踐成效：臺灣經驗之呈現。社會科學論叢，4（2），3-33。宋麗玉、施教裕、徐淑婷（2015）。優勢觀點與精神障礙者之復元：駱駝進帳與螺旋上升。台北市：洪葉。宋麗玉、施教裕、張錦麗（2004年12月）。優點個案管理模式簡介與評估結果報告。「九十三年推動受暴婦女優點個案管理模式處遇成果發表與研討會」發表之論文，內政部中央聯合辦公大樓南棟十八樓第五會議室。宋麗玉、施教裕、顏玉如、張錦麗（2006）。優點個案管理模式之介紹與運用於受暴婦女之評估結果。社區發展季刊，113，143-160。李雪櫻（2014）。子女監督會面服務現況之探討-以北部某會中心為例（未出版之碩士論文）。玄奘大學，新竹市。李麗珠（2006）。離婚後未成年子女會面交往之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立中正大學，嘉義縣。李懿玲（2016）。社工員在「未成年子女監督會面交往」服務中之困境探究（未出版之碩士論文）。玄奘大學，新竹市。林惠雅（2008）。家庭互動型態、子女性別與幼兒社會能力之探討。中華心理衛生學刊，21（4），351-377。邱憶晨（2016）。探視父母使用未成年子女會面交往服務之親子關係維繫經驗（未出版之碩士論文）。國立台北大學，新北市。姚美華、胡幼慧（2008）。質性研究─理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市：巨流。洪遠亮（2010）。簡析會面交往的離間現象及司法因應之道。法學新論（21），43-78。徐麗瑜、許文耀（2009）。從情緒與認知反應探討父母衝突對兒童適應的影響中華心理學刊，51（4），483-500。徐儷瑜、許文耀（2008）。父母衝突下兒童情緒反應之探討：社會學習理論與情緒安全感假說之比較。中華心理衛生學刊，21（2），111-138。張婉儀（譯）（2006）。如何幫助父母離異的孩子：附離婚法律問題（原作者：Klosinski, G.）。臺北市：華文網。（原著出版年：2004）張滿玲（譯）（1998）。折翼家庭也能翱翔:如何幫助孩子走出父母離異的陰影（原作者：Benedek, E. P. & Brown, C. F.）。臺北市：經典傳訊文化。（原著出版年：1997）許淑珍（2009）。離婚家庭子女與不同住父母的親子互動－子女的經驗與感受（未出版之碩士論文）。輔仁大學，新北市。陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究，台北市：五南出版社。陳祈安（2016）。家暴相對人對「未成年子女會面交往服務」之經驗與改變內涵及影響因素之探討（未出版之碩士論文）。政治大學，台北市。陳美秀（2008）。離婚訴訟家庭未成年子女的家庭角色、因應行為及保護因子之初探性研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。陳婉琪（2014）。都是為了孩子？父母離婚負面影響之重新評估。臺灣社會學刊，　　54，31-73。陳業鑫（2005a）。與未成年子女會面交往之司法觀點（上）。司法周刊，1225，2-3。陳業鑫（2005b）。與未成年子女會面交往之司法觀點（下）。司法周刊，1226，3。陳榮政（譯）（2014）。基礎社會研究法：質化與量化取向（原作者：Neuman, W. L.）。台北市：學富文化事業有限公司。潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究理論與應用，台北市：心理出版社。蔡佑襁（2009）。高風險家庭家庭功能促進-以優勢觀點為取向（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。衛生福利部保護服務司（2016）。97年至103年家庭暴力事件各類型件數。取自：http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOPS/DM1_P.aspx?f_list_no=806&fod_list_no=4620&doc_no=42890 鄧學仁（2011）。離婚後子女親權酌定之問題與對策。月旦法學雜誌，191，34-44。戴東雄（2015）。會面交往之內容與請求會面交往之主體。月旦法學雜誌，157，18-20。戴瑀如（2013）。從實體法的觀點論家事事件法中之親生子女關係事件程序。月旦法學雜誌，219，29-59。謝未遲（2014）。從家庭系統觀點看離異家庭子女拒絕探視之現象：個案研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。謝惠菁（2012）。受暴婦女聲請及使用「未成年子女會面交往服務」歷程經驗之探究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。顏桂英（2015）。勞燕已分飛，幼雛怎麼辦？家事調解員對離婚父母的子女監護、會面交往之成功調解策略研究（未出版之碩士論文）。玄奘大學，新竹市。魏嘉眉（2011）。單親青少年子女知覺離婚父母共親職經驗之探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。英文部分： Baker, A. (2006a). Patterns of Parental Alienation Syndrome: A Qualitative Study of Adults Who were Alienated from a Parent as a Child. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 63-78. Baker, A. (2006b). The Long-Term Effects of Parental Alienation on Adult Children: A Qualitative Research Study. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 33, 289-302. Beyer, M. (2008). Visit Coaching: Building on Family Strengths to Meet Children`s Needs. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 59(1), 47-57. Birnbaum, R., & Alaggia, R. (2006). Supervised visitation A call for a second generation of research. Family Court Review, 44(1),119-134. Bullen, T. Taplin, S., Kertesz, M., Humphreys, C. & McArthur, M. (2015). Literature review on supervised contact between children in out-of-home care and their parents. Institute of Child Protection Studies Canberra Campus, Australian Catholic University, Australia. Capenter, J. (2002). Mental health recovery paradigm: Implications for social work. Health &social Work, 27(2), 86-94. Crook, W. P., & Oehme, K. (2007). Characteristics of supervised visitation programs serving child maltreatment and other cases. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 7(4), 291. Deegan, P. E. (1988). Recovery: The Lived Experience of Rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4),11-19. Fitzgerald, R., Graham, A. (2011). Something Amazing I Guess: Children`s Views on Having A Say About Supervised Contact. Australian Social Work, 64(4), 487-501. Hashim, S. (2009). Contact Between Children in Care and their Birth Families: Literature Review. Sydney: NSW Department of Community Services. Haight, W. L., Black, J. E., Manglesdorf, S., Girorgio, G., Tata, L., Schoppe, S. J., & Szewczyk, M. (2002). Making visits better: The perspectives of parents, foster parents, and child welfare workers. Child Welfare, 71, 173-202. Kelly, J.B., & Johnston, J, R. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family court review, 39(3), 249-266. Morrison, J., Mishna, F., Cook, C., & Aitken, G. (2011). Access visits: Perceptions of child protection workers, foster parents and children who are Crown wards. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1476-1482. Nesmith, A. (2013). Parent-Child Visits in Foster Care: Reaching Shared Goals and Expectations to Better Prepare Children and Parents for Visits. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 30, 237-255. Olmsted Community Services Department, Visitation/Family Access Guidelines, Retrieved from http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/groups/county_access/documents/pub/dhs_id_048528.pdf Pollack, D. (2014, April 1). Supervised Visitation and the Role of Human Service Departments [Web blog message]. Retrieved from http://childlaw.us/supervised-visitation-and-the-role-of-human-service-departments/#.WEiot-Z97IW Rachel, B., & Ramona, A. (2006). Supervised visitation: A call for a second generation of research. Family Court Review, 44(1),119-134. Saini, M., Black, T., Lwin, K., Marshall, A., Fallon, B., & Goodman, D. (2012). Child protection workers` experiences of working with high-conflict separating families. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 1309-1316. Saini, M., van Wert, M., & Gofman, J. (2012). Parent-child supervised visitation within child welfare and custody dispute contexts: An exploratory comparison of two distinct models of practice. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 163-168. Smith, G. T., Shapiro, V. B., Sperry, R. W., & LeBuffe, P. A. (2014). A Strengths-based Approach to Supervised Visitation in Child Welfare. Child Care in Practice, 20(1), 98-119. Song, L. & Shih, C. (2010). Recovery from partner abuse: the application of the strengths perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 23-32. Thoburn, J. (2003). Risks and Rewards of Adoption for Children in the Public Care. Child & Family Law Quarterly, 15(4), 391-401. Tilbury, C. & Osmond, J. (2006). Permanency planning in foster care: A research review and guidelines for practitioners. Australian Social Work, 59(3), 265-280.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學社會工作研究所 1032640041
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1032640041
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/THE.NCCU.GISW.001.2018.F04
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
004101.pdf	2297Kb	Adobe PDF2	1101	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...