English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25751429      Online Users : 161
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/119627


    Title: 社區旅遊中的共用資源管理與獲益分配:以台灣泰雅族司馬庫斯部落與鎮西堡-新光部落為例
    Common Pool Resource Management and Benefit Distribution in Community Based Tourism: Two Case Studies from Smangus and Cinsbu-Xinguang, Atayal Indigenous Communities in Taiwan
    Authors: 岳湖
    Ariel, Roi
    Contributors: 官大偉
    Kuan, Da-Wei
    岳湖
    Ariel, Roi
    Keywords: 社區旅遊
    共享資源
    利益分配
    泰雅族
    永續旅遊
    可持續旅遊
    Community based tourism
    Common pool resource
    Benefit distribution
    Indigenous people
    Taiwan
    Atayal
    Sustainable tourism
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-08-27 15:15:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去已有研究討論社區旅遊的利益分配和分享其成功案例,學者們也認同這些利益應該更廣泛地、長遠地被分配及使用;另一方面,在共用資源的研究上,許多社區旅遊組織的主要觀光資源以文化遺產或自然環境為主,在某些情況下其也可被視為共用資源,然而,與利益分配相關的議題,在以旅遊為對象之共用資源文獻中卻鮮少被提及。本研究探討當共用資源為觀光主要資源時,共用資源管理與其利益分配之間的關係。 透過實地訪查、參與觀察、深度訪談等質性方法,以及問卷調查與統計之量化方法的交叉比對,進而分析社區旅遊的自覺行動利益如何影響對旅遊共用資源管理的滿意度。從研究中可以暸解:(1)社區旅遊的利益分配有不同的“階段”,不同時期與社區旅遊管理的關係不同。當獲利分配相對平等時,其對共用資源管理的滿意度影響較小。在這種情形下,社區共同參與和管理共用資源是重要的;(2) 若社區旅遊由數個家族或不同群體共同經營,社區旅遊對獲利分配的看法則會對旅遊共用資源的管理方式產生積極影響。
    Previous studies have discussed the importance of distribution of benefits from Community Based Tourism (CBT) in the community for its success. Scholars also agree that these distribution should be as far and as wide as possible. Many CBT enterprises are based on cultural heritage and natural environment as key tourism resources. In certain cases, the natural environment as a tourism resource is a Common Pool Resources (CPR). However, the issue of CPR in tourism has not been studied much in either the tourism or the CPR literature. This study explains the relationship between the tourism CPR management framework - when it is the key CBT tourism resource - and its relationship with benefit distribution from tourism. By conducting a mixed method approach of questionnaires (quantitative) and interviews and observation (qualitative), the research analyzes how perceived benefit distribution from CBT affects the satisfaction with the way the Tourism CPR is managed. Two key understandings emerge from the study: (1) There are different “stages” of benefit distribution from CBT result in different relationship with the CBT management. When the benefit distribution is relatively equal in the community, benefit distribution does not impact the satisfaction of the Tourism CPR management. In such case, participation in managing the CPR is important to the community; (2) When the CBT is based on multiple family or group-owned enterprises, the perception of benefit distribution from CBT positively affects the satisfaction with how the Tourism CPR is managed.
    Reference: Ariel, Roi (2012). Ecotourism: Development and Conservation according to the Millennium Development Goals. Thesis presented to The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel, for the degree of Bachelor of Arts.
    Ariel, Roi (2015). Ecotourism in Indigenous Communities. Asia-Pacific Newsletter (APN). Vol. 7 Issue 1 Spring 2015, 4-10.
    Armstrong, R. (2012). An analysis of the conditions for success of community based tourism enterprises. ICRT Occasional Paper, 21, 1-52.
    Beeton, S. (2005). The case study in tourism research: A multi-method case study approach. Tourism research methods: Integrating theory with practice, 37-48.
    Berg, Kevan James (2013). Ecological and Ethno Ecological Classification of a Forested Landscape in the Tayal Mrqwang Territories, Taiwan (ROC). A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology, Canada.
    Blundell, D. (2009). Austronesian Taiwan: linguistics, history, ethnology, and prehistory. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum with Shung Ye Museum.
    Briassoulis, H. (2002). Sustainable tourism and the question of the commons. Annals of tourism research, 29(4), 1065-1085.
    Brown, M. J. (2004). Is Taiwan Chinese?: the impact of culture, power, and migration on changing identities (Vol. 2). Univ of California Press.
    Chen, Y.-S., & Howitt, R. (2017). Communal Title and Indigenous Property Rights as a Challenge for Taiwan’s Land Title Systems: insights from the Australian experience. Journal of Geographical Research, 66, 31-46.
    Chen, Y.-S., Suchet-Pearson, S., & Howitt, R. (2018). Reframing Indigenous water rights in ‘modern’ Taiwan: reflecting on Tayal experience of colonized common property. International Journal of the Commons, 12(1), 378–401.
    Chiu, F. Y. L. (1989). Taiwan’s Aborigines and their Struggle Towards Radical Democracy. in Kumar, D. and Kadirgamar, S. (ed.) Ethnicity: Identity, Conflict and Crisis (Hong Kong: Arena Press).
    Cohen, E., & Cohen, S. A. (2015). A mobilities approach to tourism from emerging world regions. Current Issues in Tourism, 18(1), 11-43.
    Coria, J., & Calfucura, E. (2012). Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Ecological Economics, 73, 47-55.
    Cronk, L., & Steadman, S. (2002). Tourists as a common-pool resource: a study of dive shops on Utila, Honduras. Economic development: An anthropological approach, 51-68.
    Denman, R. (2001). Guidelines for community-based ecotourism development. Gland, Switzerland: WWF International.
    Digital Museum of Taiwan Indigenous People (2008). Atayal. Retrieved December 28, 2015, from Digital Museum of Taiwan Indigenous People: http://www.dmtip.gov.tw/Eng/Atayal.htm
    Fennell, D.A. (1999) Ecotourism: An Introduction. London: Routledge.
    Flick, U. (Ed.). (2009). The sage qualitative research kit: Collection. SAGE Publications Limited.
    Formosa News (2015). “Residents of remote Atayal village face limited access to vital medical care (2015/04/05) http://englishnews.ftv.com.tw/read.aspx?sno=C57059015A6993978203A1511B223D1B
    GSTC (2018). Global Sustainable Tourism Council website: www.gstcouncil.org (Accessed on: March 1, 2018).
    Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Hardin and Baden (eds) Managing the Commons.
    Häusler, N., & Strasdas, W. (2003). Training manual for community-based tourism. InWEnt.
    Heenehan, H., Basurto, X., Bejder, L., Tyne, J., Higham, J. E., & Johnston, D. W. (2015). Using Ostrom's common-pool resource theory to build toward an integrated ecosystem-based sustainable cetacean tourism system in Hawaii. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(4), 536-556.
    Hipwell, W. T. (2007). Taiwan aboriginal ecotourism: Tanayiku natural ecology park. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(4), 876-897.
    Hipwell, W. T. (2009). An asset‐based approach to indigenous development in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 50(3), 289-306.
    Holden, A. (2005). Achieving a sustainable relationship between common pool resources and tourism: The role of environmental ethics. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 13(4), 339-352.
    Hsiao, H. C. (2008). ‘Ecology’ and Indigenous Political and Cultural Struggles in Taiwan: a Case Study of Two Atayal Villages. In The Fifth EATS Conference, Prague.
    Hsieh S.C. (1994). Tourism, formulation of cultural tradition, and ethnicity: a study of the Daiyan identity of the Wulai Atayal. In S. Harrell and Huang Chun-chieh (eds), Cultural Change in Postwar Taiwan. Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 184–201.
    Icyeh, L. (2011). Tnunan Smangus: The mutual enjoyment, preservation and appreciation of Smangus. Shei-Pa National Park headquarters, Fushing Village, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    International Finance Corporation (2017). 20 reasons sustainable tourism counts for development. Tourism for Development knowledge series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/558121506324624240/20-reasons-sustainable-tourism-counts-for-development
    Jacob, W. J., Liu, J., & Lee, C. W. (2015). Policy debates and indigenous education: The trialectic of language, culture, and identity. In Indigenous Education (pp. 39-61). Springer Netherlands.
    Jones, S. (2005). Community-based ecotourism: The significance of social capital. Annals of Tourism Research, 32(2), 303-324.
    Kaneko, E. (2009). Glimpses at the other world: Traditional mortuary practices of the Atayal. Pages 246-281 in D. Blundell, editor. Austronesian Taiwan. Linguistics, history, and prehistory. Pheobe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
    Yen, A. C. & Kuan, D. W. (2004). Traditional Institution and the Institutional Choice - Two CPR Self Governing Cases of Tayal Tribe in Taiwan Indigenes, Journal of Geographical Science (37): 27-49.
    Lalayan, A. (2014). Community Based Tourism in Armenia: Planning for Sustainable Development (Doctoral dissertation, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University).
    Lash, G. Y. (2003). Sustaining our spirit: Ecotourism on privately-owned rural lands and protected areas (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).
    Li, Paul Jen-Kuei (2009). "Formosan languages: the state of the art." Austronesian Taiwan: linguistics, history, ethnology, and prehistory. David Blundell, ed. Berkeley: Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Pp. 45-67.
    Lin,Y.R., Lahuy I. & Kuan D.W. (2007). Indigenous Language-Informed Participatory Policy in Taiwan: A Socio-Political Perspective. Documenting and Revitalizing Austronesian Languages, University of Hawaii Press, 134-161.
    Lu, S.-Y. & Y.-R. Lin (2008). Msgamil: Once upon a time. Tayal traditional ecological knowledge. Shei-Pa National Park Headquarters, Miaoli County, Taiwan.
    Lucchetti, V. G., & Font, X. (2013). Community based tourism: Critical success factors. The international centre for responsible tourism, 27, 1-20.
    Meriles, J. (2014). Bolivia: Community-based tourism and its market approach. Retrieved from: https://www. iz3w.org/fernweh/deutsch/aktivitaeten/rene.pdf (26.04. 2018).
    Moore, S. A., & Rodger, K. (2010). Wildlife tourism as a common pool resource issue: enabling conditions for sustainability governance. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(7), 831-844.
    Newing, H. (2011). Conducting Research in Conservation: A Social Science Perspective. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
    Nyaupane, G. P., Morais, D. B., & Dowler, L. (2006). The role of community involvement and number/type of visitors on tourism impacts: A controlled comparison of Annapurna, Nepal and Northwest Yunnan, China. Tourism management, 27(6), 1373-1385.
    Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons, The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, New York.
    Ostrom, E. (2008) The Challenge of Common-Pool Resources. Environment, 50 (4) 9-20. (Available at: http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/July-August%202008/ostrom-full.html)
    Ounmany, K. (2014). Community-Based Ecotourism in Laos: Benefits and Burdens Sharing among Stakeholders (Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin).
    Phillips, L. E. (2015). Community-Based Tourism Development in Long Lan Village, Luang Prabang, Laos (Thesis, Master of Social Sciences). University of Waikato. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10289/9874
    Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton University Press.
    Reid, D. (2010). Indigenous Rights in Taiwan and the Smangus Case. Master's thesis, College of Social Science, National Chengchi University.Rosenbloom, J. D. (2014). Defining Nature as a Common Pool Resource. In Environmental Law and Contrasting Ideas of Nature: A Constructivist Approach (ed. Keith H. Hirokawa); Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-35.
    Samà, D. (2011). The Relationship between Common Management and Ecotourism Regulation: Tragedy or Triumph of the Commons? A Law and Economics Answer. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 2(1 (3)), 78.
    Simon, S. (2005). Scarred Landscapes & Tattooed Faces: Poverty, Identity & Land Conflict in a Taiwanese Indigenous Community. In Indigenous peoples and poverty: an international perspective. Robyn Eversole, John-Andrew McNeish, and Alberto D. Cimadamore, eds. Pp. 53-68. London: Zed Books.
    Scheyvens, R. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism management, 20(2), 245-249.
    Schipani, S. (2008). Impact: the effects of tourism on culture and the environment in Asia and the Pacific: alleviating poverty and protecting cultural and natural heritage through community-based eco-tourim in Luang Namtha, Lao PDR. UNESCO Bangkok, Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education.
    Shieh, S.C. 1999. Representing Indigenous Culture: Modeling Taiwanese ‘Mountain Culutre’. In The Consumption of Nationalism in Asia. Kosaku Yoshino ed., pp: 89-110, Surrey, U.K.: Curzon Press.
    Shiunn, M., Han, Y., & Ru, Y. (2011). A study of the key success factors of the ecotourism industry in Taiwan. African Journal of Business Management, 5(2), 627.
    Simpson, M. C. (2008). The impacts of tourism initiatives on rural livelihoods and poverty reduction in South Africa: Mathenjwa and Mqobela. Responsible tourism: Critical issues for conservation and development, 239-266.
    Spradley, J. P., & McCurdy, D. W. (1980). Anthropology, the cultural perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
    Stainton, Michael ( 2007). The Politics of Taiwan Aboriginal Origins. In Taiwan: A New History. Murray A. Rubinstein, ed. Pp.27-4. New York M.E. Sharpe.
    Taiwan Interior Ministry (2016). The eighth week bulletin of Interior statistics in 2010 (the year end of indigenous population profile). Retrieved December 28, 2010, from Taiwan Interior Ministry Web Site: http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/news_content.aspx?sn=10299
    Tang, C. P., & Tang, S. Y. (2010). Institutional adaptation and community-based conservation of natural resources: the cases of the Tao and Atayal in Taiwan. Human Ecology, 38 (1), 101-111.
    TIES (The International Ecotourism Society) (2015). What is Ecotourism? http://www.ecotourism.org/what-is-ecotourism.
    UDN (聯合新聞網) (2018). The first case in the country: Cinsbu and Xinguang planned to pass the specific plan of Indigenous Peoples area [全國第1例 鎮西堡及斯馬庫斯通過原民特定區域計畫] 2018-05-25 (Accessed on May 25, 2018: https://udn.com/news/story/6656/3162193)
    UNCSD (2012): The Future We Want. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: UNCSD (United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development).
    UNEP & UNWTO (2005). Making Tourism More Sustainable - A Guide for Policy Makers http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx0592xPA-TourismPolicyEN.pdf
    UNWTO (2002), The British ecotourism market, Madrid: UNWTO. Available at: http://sdt.unwto.org/content/ecotourism-and-protected-areas (Accessed on: February 1, 2016)
    UNWTO (2018), UNWTO World Tourism Barometer: http://mkt.unwto.org/en/barometer
    Van Breugel, L. (2013). Community-based tourism: Local participation and perceived impacts.
    Walsh, E.R, and Swain M.B (2004). "Creating modernity by touring paradise: domestic ethnic tourism in Yunnan, China." Tourism Recreation Research. Vol. 29 No. 2 pp. 59-68.
    Wu, P. (2015). Taiwan's Smangus, an indigenous village with an ecotourism cooperative. Ecoclub.com, 07 Sept. 2015.
    Yamashita, S. (2011). Community-Based Associations for Sustainable Tourism Development: Fostering Sustainable Development in Developing Countries.
    Yen, A. C., & Chen, Y. A. (2013). Self-governance on indigenous community for sustainable development: a case study in Tayal community in Taiwan. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 6(2), 55-70.
    Yoshimura, M., & Wall, G. (2010). The reconstruction of Atayal identity in Wulai, Taiwan. Heritage Tourism in Southeast Asia, 49-71.
    Zheng, G. B. (2006). Discussing the The construction of contemporary "Tayal" Historical Memory from ancestral controversies [從祖源觀念爭議論當代「泰雅族」歷史記憶的建構]. (Master), National Chengchi University, Taipei.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程(IMES)
    103266006
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103266006
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.IMES.005.2018.F06
    Appears in Collections:[應用經濟與社會發展英語碩士學位學程 (IMES) ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    600601.pdf8989KbAdobe PDF219View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback